To: RobinMasters; LucyT; Fred Nerks
This photo was posted on the real long thread many months ago. Last I remember that thread was over 6,000. There was lots of speculation that, that, may be Stanly Dunham but there was never any real proof as there were no names with the photo.
I don't have the link to that thread.
14 posted on
01/04/2010 7:42:48 PM PST by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
To: Spunky
22 posted on
01/04/2010 7:49:19 PM PST by
azishot
(HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!)
To: Spunky
Ha! What took them so long? Of course it’s Stanley Armour Dunham.
To: Spunky; azishot
This photo was posted on the real long thread many months ago. Last I remember that thread was over 6,000. There was lots of speculation that, that, may be Stanly Dunham but there was never any real proof as there were no names with the photo. As I recall, the photo you are remembering is another photo of the same event. Stanley Dunham and a few other in this picture are not present in the other picture.
To: Spunky; RobinMasters; Whenifhow; malkee; STE=Q; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; ...
36 posted on
01/04/2010 8:07:00 PM PST by
LucyT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson