Posted on 01/12/2010 7:50:15 PM PST by rxsid
Edited on 01/13/2010 2:21:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
As can be seen from Obama
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Yes, I just heard it!!!
Bookmark it!!!
So if that is true, Okubo is not lying if she does the search with the year 1964???
PING
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?
Yep -- the Obamanots are trying to run as fast as they can from the fact that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he was a British national at birth and still is.
Ditto here. It's one of those things that you have to pull off the back burner of your mind, but you remember it.
But in the spirit of full disclosure, there are a few October surprises you’ll be finding out about in the coming weeks. First of all, my middle name is not what you think. It’s actually Steve. That’s right. Barack Steve Obama. — Barack Hussein “Steve” Obama, Speech given at Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, 15 Oct 2008.
Text for speeches by McCain and Obama available at:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/obama_comedy_rift_middle_name.html
bump
Ummmm..., you do know that it's typical of people at "roasts" to give a bunch of one-liners.... LOL...
Obama is giving a whole series of "one-liners" and after every one of them, the audience is laughing their heads off... :-)
I was actually laughing at a bunch of them, just listening to the above video and trying to find the "Steve" part...
Really? I didn't know that.
"I was actually laughing at a bunch of them, just listening to the above video and trying to find the "Steve" part..."
As you've read in the thread above, it's in a different video.
As you've read in the thread above, it's in a different video.
It was in the video link that I supplied in the last post I did... :-)
I listened to the video and I do confirm that he did say he was "Steve" -- and I was even laughing at that part, too.... LOL...
We might all not want Obama around, but he did tell a bunch of funny "one-liners" -- including the one where he said he was "Steve"... :-)
Yeah..., that was funny too... Obama was really cracking a bunch of one-liners there... LOL...
Yup, If Obama referred to himself as Steve, it wasn’t in that video.
He does say "Steve" -- but Obama is cracking a joke -- a bunch of "one-liners" at a "Roast" of John McCain....
I even laughed when Obama did that with "Steve".... LOL...
Leo was going to follow up with a lawsuit on this but he disappeared elsewhere but only after criticizing and diminishing all real efforts being made by others. In truth, I don't think Leo really was interested in finding out the truth about Obama’s citizenship status because when he got close in this UIPA strategy he took over from Ms. Tickley - he dropped it and closed his blog. Ms. Tickley’s findings were fuzzy to me but then she disappeared.
Now we have this kooky thing that makes no sense. A lot of these folks are just weird and manipulative. I think Obama is hiding his birth data and background records for a reason that is not good. But there seems to be a lot of people cropping up to mislead and lie in order to misinform, discredit, discourage and confuse the “birthers.”
I think Obama is hiding his birth data and background records for a reason that is not good. But there seems to be a lot of people cropping up to mislead and lie in order to misinform, discredit, discourage and confuse the “birthers.”
That's why I've said, from the beginning (just after the election took place) that we needed to pass some state laws which will require all candidates to produce a birth certificate or else they cannot be on the ballot in that state.
Several states have started that process, including my own state last year. But, none have passed so far. I would encourage all FReepers to work on this legislation as I think it's the only solid way to get that information which is contained on the birth certificate...
I posted the following to Charlton. It was “awaiting moderation” but has disappeared apparently because he refused to post it:
Seizethecarp says:
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 at 12:01 PM
I support investigation and release of Obama’s HI original vital records, but your headline and conclusion, “UIPA REQUEST CONFIRMS QUIP”, is false logic on its face. HI actually DENIED the quip. You then conclude that the delay in response time equates to a CONFIRMATION of the quip. This is not logical.
If there were no STEVE DUNHAM in the HI vital records, their written response would have been the same, but you don’t allow for this in your logic. Your test of whether there is a STEVE DUNHAM in the HI vital records cannot be falsified by an HI denial, per your logic.
HI has been bombarded with UIPA requests and threats of lawsuits so delays are inevitable regardless of how easy they are to respond to.
I respectfully suggest that you retract this story ASAP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.