Hawaii Department of Health Actively Covering for Obama's Changed Vital Record

The Post & Email ^ | JAN. 10, 2010 | Nellie Esquire

[urtax$@work]

HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ACTIVELY COVERING FOR OBAMA’S CHANGED VITAL RECORD by Nellie Esquire

(Jan. 10, 2010) — People are asking how so many terrorist red flags could be overlooked by so many. The answer is, that they have been overlooked the same way these “birther” red flags were not only overlooked, but ridiculed.

Some examples of these “Birther” red flags can be culled from the public behavior of the Hawaii Department of Health and the Hawaii Office for Information Practices, in response to public inquiry regarding Obama’s vital records, which are an essential documentary issue in establishing his citizenship status, and whether he meets the qualifications of the office of U.S. President, which not only requires that one be a U.S. Citizen, but also a natural born citizen.

Let’s list just a few cases in point.

[urtax$@work]

I don,t think has been posted to FR yet. If it has, the poster should be more thoughtful in the use of keywords. This posting is a precursor to the John Charlton article: UIPA REQUEST CONFIRMS QUIP...1/12 Tuesday.

[Mount Athos]

The main way to avoid dupes is using the original title

[Admin Moderator]

To prevent duplication, please use the title at the source. Thanks.

[vin-one]

either way interesting article when you go through the whole thing.

[vin-one]

either way interesting article when you go through the whole thing.

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[urtax$@work]

bttt

[stockpirate]

PING

[LucyT]

Hawaii Department of Health Actively Covering for Obama's Changed Vital Record

Hawaii Department of Health Actively Covering for Obama's Changed Vital Record

Corruption Ping.

[Thanks stockpirate and urtax$@work.]

[Red Steel]

It’s obvious. They’ve been evasive and misleading from the beginning.

[ridesthemiles]

Is there any record anywhere of NObama being a registered voter?

How about cencus paperwork? Your birthplace was a question on those forms in the past- don’t know about this year’s form.

[ridesthemiles]

Is there any record anywhere of NObama being a registered voter?

How about census paperwork? Your birthplace was a question on those forms in the past- don’t know about this year’s form.

[ASA Vet]

The last released census was the 1930. They must be over 70 years old before they can be released.

[jamese777]

Its a shame that the Republican Governor of Hawaii and the Republican Attorney General of Hawaii haven’t been more helpful with these issues. The Director of the Hawaii Health Department, Dr. Fukino is an appointee and an employee of Governor Lingle.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

Someone should call Glenn Beck.....wait, he thinks Birthers are Liberals....

BTW Great article....thanks for posting

[antiRepublicrat]

Well, the original birther was a liberal, and a Hillary supporter.

But the libs like to pretend it’s a right-wing thing.

[American Constitutionalist]

Yes.... as if they are innocent and pure as the wind driven snow ... mega sarcasm ..

[tutstar]

the DOH was forced in September of 2009 to reveal that Obama’s original birth certificate had been amended and that Obama or his representative has paid a fee to have his certificate amended. This admission was made in the form of a denial on August 18, 2009 to a UIPA request to release such accompanying documents for the amended filing. According to the OIP Manual, a State Agency can only deny the release of documents which actually exist; if they do not exist, they must explicitly say that they do not exist.

Since all Amendments must be noted on the certificate, an alleged image of an Obama COLB, which does not bear the word “Amended” is a forgery; and since the COLBs bear no such indication, the DOH must have known, this entire time, that both the Factcheck.org and Fight the Smears COLB’s are forgeries.

[JohnnyP]

Where are the COLB loving Trolls?

We birthers should ZOT them with your post every time they bring up the phony COLB.

[curiosity]

I haven't had time to check all the claims in this article. However, just for the heck of it, I checked the very first one it makes and I found it to be incorrect.

Specifically, the article claims:

1. Hawaii Department of Health Director Fukino made no mention — until November of 2009 — of the existence of the DOH Administrative Rule showing that election officials could have received a copy of Obama’s original birth certificate without his permission. ... [T]he current rules – Chapter 8b, 2.5(A)(1)(f) – would allow any election officer overseeing the placement of Obama’s name on the ballot to receive a certified copy.

So I went and I read Chapter 8b, 2.5 (A) (1) (f), and it allows nothing of the kind.

Here's what it says:

2.5 Eligibility for Copies of Birth Certificates
A. Standard Copy. A certified copy of the original birth certificate on file with the Department of Health as described in paragraph 2.4B(1) may be issued to:

(1) The registrant, his descendants, his authorized agent, or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction. "Authorized Agent" means:

...(f) A government agency acting on behalf of the registrant to process a financial claim, beneft, award, or other compensation or to transact official business involving the registrant or his affairs.

Sorry, but there's no way any rational person, even using the loosest, most creative method of legal interpretation, could possibly construe the above to mean that an election officer placing Obama on the ballot has a right to access his birth certificate.

Given how the article makes a huge factual error so quickly, right off the bat, I really don't have much confidence that anything else it says is accurate.