Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll:Scott Brown surges to double-digit lead over Martha Coakley - Brown (55%)Coakley (40%)
http://www.myfoxboston.com ^ | Jan 18, 2010 | www.myfoxboston.com

Posted on 01/18/2010 12:49:41 PM PST by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 last
To: 2CAVTrooper
Think about it, people see him winning by double digits, and they figure that they don’t need to go vote for him because he’ll win anyways.

I don't trust polls either, but for fundamental reasons. A strategy as you suggest can work both ways. Sure, those supporting the surging candidate can take it their vote won't be needed. But those supporting the opposition candidate can also take it their vote would be wasted when the percentages get blown way out of proportion.

201 posted on 01/19/2010 6:16:45 AM PST by bcsco (Hey, GOP: The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: biggiant1

I’ll be praying all day!


202 posted on 01/19/2010 6:28:02 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I STILL cannot believe they swept that march under the rug.

I was there, and then to see there was almost no mention of it on the news was staggering.
++++++++++++++

Staggering, sickening, shocking, breathtaking - and yet, somehow, oh so predictable for the socialist RAT media that has pretended to be truth tellers for the past 75 years. What happened that day and in the week after should remove all doubt about who these so called 4th Estate people really are (including how Beck talks about where are Time’s and Life’s pictures of Tea Parties for 2009 - ‘how can they tell the story of 2009 without one picture of YOU?’)


203 posted on 01/19/2010 6:33:32 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

Polls opened at 7 they all close at 8PM. If you are in line at 8 PM you will be allowed to vote.


204 posted on 01/19/2010 6:52:32 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor

THE SHENNANIGANS HAVE BEGUN!!!

Over night, in my Northern Middlesex County town of 6,000 a Republican strong hold, ALL SCOTT BROWN SIGNS STOLEN

We voted at 9:00 this morning, there are 3 precincts in town. We were number 277 and 278.

Weather: Light snow, wind calm, 26 degrees. Prediction for snow to increase


205 posted on 01/19/2010 6:56:23 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
I thought you would appreciate this analysis I did after the event to demonstrate a basic difference between liberalism and conservatism:


206 posted on 01/19/2010 8:31:04 AM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Weather at 2:15 PM in Northern Middlesex County
Light snow, wind calm, temp 30 degrees.
Primary roads and highways wet
secondary roads in tough shape.
Just came back from taking Mother In Law to polls in Westford. She said 776 had voted.


207 posted on 01/19/2010 11:25:42 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

“I don’t want to see you bald, “

Like I told ya before, there was no fear of me getting bald.
My hair is very safe thank you.
My prediction was based on cold hard facts and clear headed analysis, and I was exactly right.


208 posted on 01/19/2010 8:01:44 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
No, like the shift Ratward that happened in NY-23, which was a federal special election that got nationalized towards the end as well. Hoffman had all the momentum there, too.”

You were wrong, and I was right.

209 posted on 01/19/2010 8:08:46 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Uh, the final result was 52-47.


210 posted on 01/19/2010 8:21:43 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
The final result was Scott Brown WON (like I predicted he will), and Martha Coakley LOST.
That's all that matters.
211 posted on 01/19/2010 8:24:42 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman
See, nothing to worry about. Too much light in this race. Rats are coy to light, and tempter their rattish ways in its presence.

Now, enjoy the fallout! :-)

212 posted on 01/19/2010 11:53:05 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
I'm truly stuned :) LOL. What surprises me more than anything is the relatively ‘small’ number of reported improprieties which has restored some of the faith lost this past year. You were spot on Lex and I'm overjoyed at being wrong this time!
213 posted on 01/20/2010 12:30:42 AM PST by Outlaw Woman (If you remove the first Amendment, we'll be forced to move on to the next one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Anybody notice the boston numbers? brown was at something around 45k when Coakley was at around 92k. Brown ended with around 46,000 while Coakley ended with over 105,000.

‘Sup with that? Coakley gets another 12k while Brown gets a grand? Something is not right there.

Sure, he won, but some precinct results sure look “fishy”.


214 posted on 01/20/2010 12:45:50 AM PST by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
Unless the voting models are off, because the pollsters could be making the same faulty assumptions. There are no reliable models for special elections. “

Turns out voting models for special elections were no more different than voting models for any other elections.

I don’t want to see you bald, man, “

Like I said before, I wasn't gping to. I don’t make bets lightly.

215 posted on 01/22/2010 7:13:17 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

“So you are saying a 15 point lead is beyond the margin of ACORN?
I hope so.
The dead in MA won’t sleep much tomorrow. They will be busy going to polling places.”

You were wrong, and I was right.


216 posted on 01/22/2010 7:34:24 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

“You were wrong, and I was right.”

You are the man; take a bow!!!
It just that means Brown would have won by 20 points in a fair election.


217 posted on 01/22/2010 8:15:48 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
The models were way off. It could have been a squeaker. The end game was huge.

As I predicted, Peabody, Gardner and Fitchburg were out of step with the state average. The margins in those towns in 2010 were much greater than the margin statewide. The burbs broke hard for Scott, whereas the West and the cities remained almost as Blue as ever.

218 posted on 01/22/2010 5:57:21 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
The models were way off”

You are still reaching.
PPP was exactly on spot(a +5 win for Scott Brown win), and they use the same computerized automated calling as Rasmussen does.
Suffolk University (+4) was only off by 1%.
ARG(+3), was off by only 2% as well.
Their models worked just fine.

It could have been a squeaker”

It wasn't.
Scott Brown won by 5%, which is not much different from the margin that 0bama won over McCain, and 0bama’s win was being called a “landslide”. And this was a Republican in the bluest of blue states.

The end game was huge. “

Democrats had a far bigger ground game and "get out the vote" operation (SEIU etc) than Republicans do in Massachusetts.. It’s not even close.

The burbs broke hard for Scott, whereas the West and the cities remained almost as Blue as ever.”

Scott Brown even won Hyannis Port, Ted Kennedy's home town, Ted Kennedy’s own backyard.

219 posted on 01/22/2010 6:20:45 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson