Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama should have blamed Bush, not bankers
London Times Online (U.K.) ^ | January 21, 2010 | Anatole Kaletsky

Posted on 01/21/2010 12:13:37 PM PST by Schnucki

The Democrats’ disastrous defeat in Massachusetts will allow the President’s opponents to claim credit for the recovery

Why can the Left never win? Around the world, the election of Barack Obama inspired the hope of a new era of progressive politics, coming as it did after the spectacular failures of extreme conservatism under George W. Bush. But on Tuesday night, only one year after his inauguration, these hopes were suddenly destroyed.

The crushing defeat of the Democratic candidate to succeed the late Edward Kennedy as senator for Massachusetts, does not only wreck Mr Obama’s hopes of signing a health reform Bill this month, the main objective of his first year as President; far worse, as Massachusetts is the most solidly Democratic state in the union, it portends defeat for Democrats all across America in November’s congressional elections.

Massachusetts was the only state to vote Democrat in the most lopsided election in US history, the 1972 re-election of Richard Nixon. So the import of this defeat is undeniable even to the most Panglossian of left-wingers: if the Democrats could not hold Teddy Kennedy’s seat, no Democratic legislator anywhere in the US is secure.

The implication is that America and the world must now prepare for the longest lame-duck presidency in history, lasting at least until the 2012 election and, perhaps, until 2016 in the quite possible event that Mr Obama is re-elected alongside a Republican Congress determined to obstruct every idea that he represents. At a time when the need for effective government within America and the challenges for US global leadership are greater than for a generation, this is a potential disaster.

There is one hope. Left-of-centre parties the world over might learn from this electoral disaster. They might start to understand why conservatism has an inbuilt advantage in all

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brown; bush; healthcare; koolaid; lameduck; lol; massachusetts; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
LOL
1 posted on 01/21/2010 12:13:37 PM PST by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Extreme Conservatism?

Wow, the Brits near Islamic conversion has muddied their brains.


2 posted on 01/21/2010 12:15:12 PM PST by wac3rd (Felipe Calderon supports the public option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
the spectacular failures of extreme conservatism under George W. Bush.

What's this "extreme conservatism" you speak of Kimosabe?

3 posted on 01/21/2010 12:16:30 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

wow. Talk about a head up an anus


4 posted on 01/21/2010 12:16:38 PM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Why can the Left never win?

Oh, I don't know. Could it be because they're an EVIL, CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE?

5 posted on 01/21/2010 12:17:03 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Around the world, the election of Barack Obama inspired the hope of a new era of progressive politics, coming as it did after the spectacular failures of extreme conservatism under George W. Bush.

Bush isn't a conservative rather less an extreme one. When one attempts to discredit a view it does help to have a grasp of what that view is first.

6 posted on 01/21/2010 12:17:11 PM PST by highlander_UW (There's a storm coming - little kid at a Mexican gas station in The Terminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Ya gotta love a dipstick lefty who quotes E. J. Dionne as a reference.


7 posted on 01/21/2010 12:17:39 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
The conservatives’ advantage is simple: they know exactly what they are trying to achieve. They seek to preserve, as far as possible, existing structures of economic privilege, power and social traditions. That means, of course, the preservation of the capitalist system.

Well, duh, you stupid limeys. It's what makes the US the greatest nation in the history of the world.

8 posted on 01/21/2010 12:19:11 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

“spectacular failures of extreme conservatism under George W. Bush”

Extreme?

Bush was far from extreme; I wish.

Lord, this article is sickening. I hope it’s only “opinion/editorial”.


9 posted on 01/21/2010 12:20:24 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

It was like reading the old Pravda. He used real words, and I recognized some of the place names, but other than that it was gibberish.


10 posted on 01/21/2010 12:20:57 PM PST by Woebama (Never, never, never quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The author wasn’t paying attention, because obama DID blame Bush by saying that voters were angry over the last 8 years.

When you think about it, though, that really doesn’t make sense for obama to tout that, because that would mean that they were only mad at Bush for 7 years, and obama for one year. That means that America has been angry at obama for 100% of his presidency, and only made at Bush for 87.5%; making Bush a more liked president by 12.5%.

Ramble over


11 posted on 01/21/2010 12:21:45 PM PST by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

“Privilege”, my @!$@#@.

The Brits ought to know all about privilege.

It’s part of what offended Americans and made them want to unleash themselves from the privileged.


12 posted on 01/21/2010 12:22:12 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

London Times?

Something tells me this ole boy has never been to a pig pickin or a tractor pull.... or a combination Pig Pickin\Tractor Pull.

Hey Brit, isn’t about tea time? Go spread cheese on a cracker, or something.


13 posted on 01/21/2010 12:22:28 PM PST by envisio (Need tires? See my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
"...will allow the President’s opponents to claim credit for the recovery "

What recovery, retard?

14 posted on 01/21/2010 12:24:35 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

MUTINY ON THE OBAMBI

Democrats are bailing out, jumping ship. The entire Democratic Leadership is ripping the helm from President Obambi and running away from the White House as fast as they can.

What is it they see going on in that house?

They must be seeing..........what many have suspected........ the Captain CRACKIN up.


15 posted on 01/21/2010 12:25:48 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Extreme?

Bush was far from extreme; I wish.

Compared to Obama he is.

16 posted on 01/21/2010 12:28:06 PM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

re: after the spectacular failures of extreme conservatism under George W. Bush

Beauty, and success, is in the eye of the beholder.


17 posted on 01/21/2010 12:30:54 PM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki; jessduntno; Blue Turtle; pabianice; Steelfish; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; ...
Classic liberal whine post. I am not a big Bush fan but this crying is so sweet. It says Democrats were just too nice on GWB legacy and refused to blame him LOL (How's that war on FNC going?) :

The implication is that America and the world must now prepare for the longest lame-duck presidency in history, lasting at least until the 2012 election and, perhaps, until 2016 in the quite possible event that Mr Obama is re-elected alongside a Republican Congress determined to obstruct every idea that he represents. At a time when the need for effective government within America and the challenges for US global leadership are greater than for a generation, this is a potential disaster.”

Instead, Mr Obama effectively exonerated the Bush Administration by accepting personal responsibility for the crisis from the moment of his inauguration. This was brave but foolhardy. As a result, voters now blame the Democrats, not the Republicans, for unemployment. Polls show that the Democrats’ $800 billion jobs and stimulus programme, which is partly responsible for pulling the economy out of recession, is widely confused with the hated $780 billion bank bailout package introduced by the Republicans under President Bush.

Having won Massachusetts, the Republicans will have no compunction in claiming that what saved the US economy was the conservative backlash. If the Democrats fail to challenge them, this is the version of reality that American voters will start to believe.

Obama should have blamed Bush, not bankers

18 posted on 01/21/2010 12:32:09 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
HEY!!!

Instead of blaming Bush or the Banks Why not blame the people that actually caused the global financial meltdown!! I am talking about the community activists that forced the banks to adopt a financial "Affirmative Action" program that eventually resulted in this whole fiasco!

What ever happened to "Giving credit to whom credit is due" and I am not talking about financial credit.....I am talking about taking responsibility for their actions.

19 posted on 01/21/2010 12:33:56 PM PST by R_Kangel (`.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Mr Kaletsky was born in 1952 in Moscow, USSR... (from Wikipedia)

Not sure why everyone thinks he's a Brit. He may live there but he's surely been bred to believe in socialism.

20 posted on 01/21/2010 12:34:27 PM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson