Posted on 01/23/2010 11:42:53 AM PST by jmaroneps37
Stealthy but well funded United Nations maneuvers to strip American citizens of their legal right to keep and bear arms are well underway.
The UN agenda is to push countries to adopt a universally binding treaty that would supersede our U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.
A very important video by NRA investigative reporter Ginny Simone explaining this threat has been removed from youtube, but you can still access it at www.ammonland.com or on the NRA web site. Simone takes viewers to the London headquarters of IANSA-International Action Network for Small Arms- a global network to stop “proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons.” She shows us IANSA is plotting to tear down the Second Amendment.
IANSA head Rebecca Peters said, “It’s time (for) tough, tough gun laws,” after she successfully pushed through a binding gun ban treaty in Australia. Simone reports Peters has “an endless supply of dollars” to wage a successful anti gun propaganda campaign here in America.
Seemingly endless amounts of dollars appear available to IANSA from over 800 NGO’s-non governmental organizations- with Japan donating $1.87 million and Britain giving a 2 million dollar grant. “U.S. citizens don’t have the blanket right to use guns as they see fit,” declared Amnesty International’s Henry Smith.
Slow but steady erosion worldwide
In NYC Rick Cowan, a retired hero detective, was stripped of his right to carry after a simple automobile wreck. Even though Cowan infiltrated the mob and got medals for his bravery, he now is on the department’s No Carry list. Law abiding Louisiana citizens saw their guns confiscated after Katrina, and the Philippine government just instituted a nationwide gun ban to stave off violence for an election that won’t happen until May.
A North Carolina anti gun Democratic state senator..
(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...
Since they violated the agreement made by "We the People.." then they are no longer my government but a group of outlaws attempting to order me about and they will be either ignored or removed.
As you are not an American you perhaps do not know that every member of the military, every office holder swears to "Uphold, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America".
Violate that oath and game over.
Where I live I won’t be alone !
They really don’t get it,,do they? We have guns as a natural right. We won’t turn them in like good brits and aussies. We aren’t coming for them,, but when they come for the American guns, they will get a quick education on American exceptionalism.
Yep, civil as long as they submit and back down on any collection attempt. But not the civil disobedience of our accepting their being made illegal, and hiding them away.
If it’s time to hide weapons from a government, its actually time to USE those weapons to restore the constitution.
It occurs to me that your average UN peacekeeper is no match for any armed American. This is not some third world sh*thole where there is no law, and they would find out damned quickly what happens when daddy’s little princess gets messed with. I can picture it in my mind, the first time some UN goober demands that I give him my weapons, and I just point at the wall where the big rack is, and tell him that I fetched that one at 900 yds. and he’s a lot closer than that.
And the a$$clowns in DC wonder why there is an increase in armed “militias” in this country .
“Just a question who are “they”?”
“They” are *anyone* who comes to collect, or demands i turn in, the guns i own. Especially a foreigner, or a US government working in concert with a foreign entity. The only moral response is to resist with all means.
This is proven by German Jews, Russians arrested in the terror, Cambodians under Pol Pot, etc. Solzhenitsyn wrote how the arresting agents of such regimes should have been murdered at the doors, in the stairwells, etc. The Jew deportation would have been a most nasty proposition for Adoph if one or 2 Nazi cops or Gestapo were shot dead at each doorway.
A government that tries to confiscate weapons is not Constitutional here and deserves bitter resistance. In fact, they would be repeating King George almost exactly.
And the cool part is, that if you leave gun owners alone, there will be no problem in the first place. (except if course, there are limits to how despotic you can become!)
America is the last free place on earth, theres nowhere left to run to. So it’s a fight, right here, if they try.
No.
They won’t.
Don’t let that fruitcake Chief of Police in New Orleans be your yardstick on what the police will do. To be fair, I wasn’t in his shoes, and to the best of my knowledge there has never been another disaster where five hundred police officers walked off the job for their families and self preservation.
I have already told my brothers and sisters in blue that if any orders come down to confiscate weapons from law abiding citizens, they will be fighting me as well. Most said, I am with you.
If any orders come down, it will be the Fed trying to make it happen. We locals have some serious trust issues with the Feds as well. They can’t make us do anything. They don’t have the wherewithal or the resources to start arresting local officers who tell them to get bent. Besides, try arresting a cop on some trumped BS charges, and you will have the resisting of your life.
I know a lot of Fed officers. NONE, and I mean, NONE, have talked about confiscating weapons from law abiding citizens. Gang members are another story.
Met this morning with 10 guys from my church men’s group on this very item. All are gun owners and right wing conservatives. Believe me, there are many many more of them not mentioned and we aren’t passive, and we know how to shoot. So please send the UN flunkies here. Oh BTW, by that time my son will be out of the Rangers and standing with me. It will be fun to introduce them to a real American with an attitude.
You will not be alone.
I am a proud member of oathkeepers.
Think about it.
oathkeepers.org
As you are not an American you perhaps do not know that every member of the military, every office holder swears to “Uphold, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America”...
Feds have a long tradition of attaching federal monies to things and getting the local PD’s to dance their tune. I hope our right, but I figure that lots of mayors would participate in this. New York, Chicago first, then down the line. But you also have to understand that a trust deficit exists between P.D.’s and citizens that has been built over the last 50 years. After my house being burglarized and my experience with the local P.D. I don’t think next time I will even bother to call those worthless protectors. Federal money with strings attached. Feds will buy new vests and Police cars in exchange for confiscating weapons. I think lots of mayors would sign on. Lots of cops want to keep their jobs. I hope your right. I fear your not. So it’s time Cops start acting like the protectors they claim to be and not just union thugs with badges whose job is to protect political institutions.
It was through Soros` Open Society Institute (OSI) that he bankrolled world gun-ban strategist Rebecca Peters to oversee the May 2000 Million Mom March (MMM). Soros brought Peters, called “our fairy godmother” by MMM organizers, to the United States from Australia to work on both domestic and international gun control schemes. Peters had leapt to the world gun-ban stage as the individual who created Australia`s shameful 1996-97 collection and destruction of virtually all registered semi-auto and pump long guns from licensed collectors, shooters and hunters.
...As a reward for Peter`s work in America, Soros helped to create and fund her International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) to take the civil disarmament crusade worldwide and to concentrate on the United Nations as Soros` instrument for civilian arms destruction.
In the meantime, OSI and Soros poured millions of dollars into punitive lawsuits to bankrupt America`s firearm industry. Those suits were ultimately overturned in the federal appeals courts, yet they still have cost consumers millions of dollars.
WE`RE BARAAACK! The Billionaire Gun-Banners Who Back Obama`s "Change"
Greetings Mr. or Ms. Ambassador,speaking for all other countries outside the United States.
Ah, but that is the beauty of the US Constitution. By it's own processes, 51% CANNOT remove the right to keep and bear arms from the Constitution. It takes two-thirds of BOTH houses of Congress, as well as a majority vote in each of three-quarters of all state legislatures to remove that right. And any attempt to try such a manuever using the "foreign treaty" ploy will only succeed in starting American Revolution II.
“and since we all live in a democracy the majority has a lot of power”
No, we do not. We live in a constitutional republic. That means the 51% can govern ONLY within narrow limits defined by the constitution. Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner. A constitutional republic says the sheep cannot be on the menu no matter what the wolves say,,, AND the sheep gets to back it up with a magnum.
And since you seem to ask a lot of innocent questions, here’s an innocent question for you. Why is a group based in the UK, so interested in working on disarming regular Americans?
Why not start with the palestinians first? Or how about some mass murdering governments? How about a complete ban in Africa? Where is the movement for free speech in England? Where is the pressure on the Saudis to allow non-muslims to visit mecca?
Im quite surprised that the biggest threat to world peace is the privately owned gun of an American. A little odd,, huh?
We are not a democracy we are a constitutional republic. And the Second Amendment stating that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is part of that Constitution. The military literally CAN NOT come to take my guns away no matter who votes what because that would violate their oath.
They also can not shut down my church, they can not move into my home (except for war time conditions), they can not prevent me from political speech, they can not award a patent of nobility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.