Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JD Hayworth, the Americanization Doctrine, and Nazism (JD Is a nazi lover -BARF ALERT)
Race for 2012 ^ | 1/25/10 | Kris Lorelli

Posted on 01/27/2010 10:26:47 AM PST by pissant

Grassroots conservatives are jumping for joy at the prospect of a challenge to Senator McCain in the 2010 Arizona Republican primary. Leading this charge is controversial talk-show host and former Congressman, JD Hayworth.

Although Hayworth is on the correct side of most economic and security issues facing America in 2010, the roots of his ideological views are disturbing, even to the most conservative and libertarian activist.

Hayworth is one of America’s most vocal supporters of the ‘Americanization’ doctrine. This doctrine goes beyond the policies of English only and immigrant assimilation into the American culture. The re-birth of this movement in the early 20th century was deeply-rooted in an anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant and anti-black/brown philosophy.

Throughout Hayworth’s career, he has cited Henry Ford (the father of 20th century Americanization doctrine) as the model for American government and industry to follow. On the surface, Ford’s Americanization policy appeared to fall within the mainstream of American society, which included such programs as English language training for immigrants hired to work on his assembly lines. In his 2006 book, “Whatever It Takes: Illegal Immigration, Border Security, and the War on Terror,”, Hayworth wrote;

the ever-so-successful process that used to be called ‘Americanization’ was a major movement in the early 1900s … Henry Ford, a leader in this movement,

These men of many nations must be taught American ways, the English language, and the right way to live.’ Talk like that today and our liberal elites will brand you a cultural imperialist, or worse. But if you ask me, Ford had a better idea.

What the former Congressman failed to mention was that ‘Ford’s idea’‘ was based on xenophobic and anti-Jewish beliefs. Aside from being one of America’s great industrial innovators, Henry Ford was also a media baron. One of his publications, the Dearborn Independent, promoted Ford’s belief in the Jewish world conspiracy. Hayworth also failed to mention that Ford was one of the German Nazi parties earliest foreign supporters. In Hitler, Ford saw an individual who was willing to adopt many of the same Americanization policies towards “Jewish bankers”, non-whites and immigrants in Germany and the axis occupied countries.

As a reward for his support and a recognition of their shared beliefs, Adolph Hitler awarded Henry Ford the Grand Cross of the German Eagle in 1938, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners. Other winners included; Benito Mussolini, Heinrich Himmler, Jozef Tiso and Charles Lindbergh.

I am not suggesting JD Hayworth is promoting Nazism in Arizona and America, (as I am sure the liberal media will have plenty to say about this if Hayworth were to win the nomination), but for the former Congressman not have not found a better example than Ford’s Americanization doctrine, when suggesting solutions for America’s cultural and security issues, should be troubling for all republicans.

I know for many of my fellow conservative and libertarian republicans it can be frustrating when the liberal media is quick to brand us as racist when we push for policies that promote enhanced security at our southern border and legislation that recognizes English as the official language of the Unites States, but to offer them a candidate who has the ability to brand each one of us as anti-Semitic and xenophobic, is not a risk I am willing to take in a year that may allow the GOP to regain control of the House and Senate.

Go away, JD Hayworth.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az2010; hohum; jdhayworth; mccain; slur; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
Who are these spineless, worthless, pieces of sh*t at the Race 4 2012? This is the 4th hit piece they've done on Hayworth in the last couple weeks.

I guess any site that is listing Jon Huntsman, Newt, Pawlenty, and Crist as possible presidential candidates would be scared poopless of a conservative like JD.

Screw these pansies. Go JD!

1 posted on 01/27/2010 10:26:49 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

Slanderous liberal spew. They’re getting desperate.


2 posted on 01/27/2010 10:30:02 AM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
Slanderous liberal republican spew
3 posted on 01/27/2010 10:31:08 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Don’t worry this is not what Hayworth has to worry about. Abramhoff is what will dog him.


4 posted on 01/27/2010 10:31:59 AM PST by Maelstorm (We are umbilicaled to a parasitic beast that feeds off one man so to enslave another to dependency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Yeah. I seem to recall his conviction and jail sentence. /s


5 posted on 01/27/2010 10:33:26 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Just go away "Race for 2012".
I am sure Keith Olbermann will have a job for these clowns.
6 posted on 01/27/2010 10:33:27 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Sloppy reporting by an attack goon:

Grand Cross of the German Eagle...a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners. Other winners included...Heinrich Himmler.

Himmler was not a foreigner. He was more German then Hitler

7 posted on 01/27/2010 10:36:13 AM PST by Michael.SF. (At least Hitler got the Olympics for Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Don’t worry this is not what Hayworth has to worry about. Abramhoff is what will dog him.”

John McCain's Keating 5 scandal says “HELLO”.

8 posted on 01/27/2010 10:36:42 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; pissant

Oh, yes, the “Abramoff” charge...with NOTHING to back it up, as usual. J.D. is on solid ground if that’s the best McCain has got.

Yes, like MOST republicans, he got campaign contributions from some of Abramoff’s clients. Not bribes, everything was cleared for Hayworth on this issue.

Were you a George W. Bush fan? Now, there’s a connection to Abramoff you should actually worry about. Bush put him on his transition team for the Interior Dept and screwed it up beyond repair. Abramoff was also one of Bush’s biggest $$$ contributors...millions, not thousands.

McCain has more corruption baggage in an average year than you can dream up for Hayworth in a lifetime. McCain has the gratitude of democrats to vote for him. NO conservative should.


9 posted on 01/27/2010 10:38:29 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It there is error in the article please counter it with facts of truth. The hatchet media will quickly ferret out any facts and twist them to kill his chances. Look at this as an opportunity to see what is coming.

My first thought was ... now I know why Sarah is not campaigning for J.D. Hayworth.

I do welcome a true conservative. Not a tyrant.

10 posted on 01/27/2010 10:38:31 AM PST by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The website is actually www.race42008.com. The company who owns the site is Domains by Proxy, Inc. out of Scottsdale, AZ. McCain may even be a good guess as owner.


11 posted on 01/27/2010 10:39:07 AM PST by buschbaby (No longer silent ~ No longer polite ~ Fights the idiots with truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I believe in slowing legal (and utterly halting illegal) immigration for a time. I support English being the official language.

Guess I better go shopping for swastika armbands, according to this writer ...


12 posted on 01/27/2010 10:39:22 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geologist

I’ll let you worry about that, skippy. Inform yourself. I’m not here to educate McCain butt sniffers.


13 posted on 01/27/2010 10:40:31 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

There is a subset of palinistas who live in world where the princess can do no wrong, so they are left having to pimp for McCain.


14 posted on 01/27/2010 10:44:25 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Weak.


15 posted on 01/27/2010 10:44:25 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Such a positive attitude will do wonders for who it is you are supporting. You think?

Getting antagonistic and insulting is a choice. It does not win friends and influence people for your friend/candidate. MO

Have a nice day.

16 posted on 01/27/2010 10:45:13 AM PST by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

“I believe in slowing legal (and utterly halting illegal) immigration for a time. I support English being the official language.

Guess I better go shopping for swastika armbands, according to this writer ...”

You’ve exactly called the plan...typically a McCain tactic...turn off the conservative voters with charges of racism, etc.
What you have here, in this entire McCain vs. JD debate is the battle over immigration. McCAin and his squatter support squad want Amnesty. J.D. does not. THAT is what this is ALL about.

But, good ol’ McCain...what was he doing??

Saturday, February 09, 2008
Bill to improve health care…in Mexico! McCain strikes again!

What would Americans think, then, of a member of Congress who introduced legislation, not to improve health care in the United States, but to improve health care in Mexico?

Insane? Drunk? Unworthy of public office?

What would Americans think, then, of a bill introduced in Congress that required federal agencies to come up with a plan, not to expand health coverage in the United States, but to expand health coverage in Mexico?

Impossible? Unthinkable? Wildly irresponsible?

What would Americans think, then, of the motives of a senator, who not only introduced a bill to improve Mexico’s health care system and extend coverage to a growing population of 120 million people, but gave health insurance companies the right to help devise the plan?

Blatantly corrupt? Grossly indifferent to the well-being of the American people? Downright treasonous?

Unbelievable as it may seem, the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act of 2005 contained a provision giving insurance companies the right to help devise a plan for extending US health care to Mexico (Sec. 1004. BINATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND HEALTH INSURANCE).

Even more unbelievable, the senator who sponsored the bill is not on the verge of being thrown out of office for this odious piece of legislation. No, the senator who introduced the bill, Senator John McCain of Arizona, is on the verge of locking up the Republican nomination to be our next president[snip]

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=john+mccain+fred+thompson

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 12, 2005

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

TITLE X—PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE

Sec. 1001. Federal reimbursement of emergency health services furnished to undocumented aliens.

Sec. 1002. Prohibition against offset of certain Medicare and Medicaid payments.

Sec. 1003. Prohibition against discrimination against aliens on the basis of employment in hospital-based versus nonhospital-based sites.

Sec. 1004. Binational public health infrastructure and health insurance.
http://opensourceactivist.org/content/legislation/S1033/text.php#sec1004


17 posted on 01/27/2010 10:46:44 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Have the idiots define “Americanization Doctrine.”

I am having a very difficult time of finding even the mere mention or hint of Americanization Doctrine via JSTOR, EBSCO Host, Academic Search Premier, ProQuest, etc. =.=


18 posted on 01/27/2010 10:47:09 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geologist

Then support McCain.


19 posted on 01/27/2010 10:47:46 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I don’t believe Palin has anything to do with McCain’s nasty campaigning. She will take hits for holding to her promise, as McNasty continues to expose himself as being himself.


20 posted on 01/27/2010 10:49:05 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“There is a subset of palinistas who live in world where the princess can do no wrong, so they are left having to pimp for McCain.”

And not strangely, they just happen to be Amnesty fans.
Many of them don’t care about Palin, they care about illegal aliens, so support McCain.
But they’ll tell us we are the minority...talk about delusional.


21 posted on 01/27/2010 10:49:50 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

I figure Palin is doing it out of a sense of obligation to McCain. Doesn’t mean that anyone has to listen to her advice on this race.


22 posted on 01/27/2010 10:51:16 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: geologist; pissant

“Getting antagonistic and insulting is a choice. It does not win friends and influence people for your friend/candidate. MO”

You just described John McCain.

Capitol Hill staffers rate their bosses.
McCain got no glory from those who work with him.
“Every election year we survey top aides on both sides of the aisle—administrative assistants, press secretaries, legislative directors, and chiefs of committee staffs—to get their up-close and personal, and anonymous, views. While there may be lots of partisan backbiting among congress members, their staffers seem far more capable of putting politics aside and making honest judgments. It wasn’t unusual for aides in both parties to name one of their own as “spineless” or give the “workhorse” nod to someone across the aisle. “

Worst Follower 2. John McCain (R-Ariz.) Show Horse 2. John McCain (R-Ariz.) Hottest Temper 2. John McCain (R-Ariz.) known to snap at staff when the cameras are off

THE McCAIN WAY - ATTACK REPUBLICANS

Defending His Amnesty Bill, “Presidential hopeful John McCain - who has been dogged for years by questions about his volcanic temper - erupted in an angry, profanity-laced tirade at a fellow Republican senator, sources told The Post yesterday. In a heated dispute over immigration-law overhaul, McCain screamed, ‘F— you!’ at Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who had been raising concerns about the legislation. ‘This is chickens—stuff,’ McCain snapped at Cornyn, according to several people in the room off the Senate floor Thursday. ‘You’ve always been against this bill, and you’re just trying to derail it.’” (Charles Hurt, “Raising McCain,” New York Post, 5/19/07)

In 2000, Sen. McCain Ran An Attack Ad Comparing Then-Gov. George W. Bush To Bill Clinton. SEN. MCCAIN: “I guess it was bound to happen. Governor Bush’s campaign is getting desperate, with a negative ad about me. The fact is, I’ll use the surplus money to fix Social Security, cut your taxes and pay down the debt. Governor Bush uses all of the surplus for tax cuts, with not one new penny for Social Security or the debt. His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We’re all pretty tired of that. As president, I’ll be conservative and always tell you the truth. No matter what.” (McCain 2000, Campaign Ad, 2/9/00; www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHoXkCprdL4)

Sen. McCain Repeatedly Called Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) nams. “Why can’t McCain win the votes of his own colleagues? To explain, a Republican senator tells this story: at a GOP meeting last fall, McCain erupted out of the blue at the respected Budget Committee chairman, Pete Domenici, saying, ‘Only an a–hole would put together a budget like this.’ Offended, Domenici stood up and gave a dignified, restrained speech about how in all his years in the Senate, through many heated debates, no one had ever called him that. Another senator might have taken the moment to check his temper. But McCain went on: ‘I wouldn’t call you an a–hole unless you really were an a–hole.’ The Republican senator witnessing the scene had considered supporting McCain for president, but changed his mind. ‘I decided,’ the senator told Newsweek, ‘I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.’” (Evan Thomas, et al., “Senator Hothead,” Newsweek, 2/21/00)

Sen. McCain Had A Heated Exchange With Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) And Called Him A “F*cking Jerk.” “Senators are not used to having their intelligence or integrity challenged by another senator. ‘Are you calling me stupid?’ Sen. Chuck Grassley once inquired during a debate with McCain over the fate of the Vietnam MIAs, according to a source who was present. ‘No,’ replied McCain, ‘I’m calling you a f—ing jerk!” (Evan Thomas, et al., “Senator Hothead,” Newsweek, 2/21/00)

In 1995, Sen. McCain Had A “Scuffle” With 92-Year-Old Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC) On The Senate Floor. “In January 1995, McCain was midway through an opening statement at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing when chairman Strom Thurmond asked, ‘Is the senator about through?’ McCain glared at Thurmond, thanked him for his ‘courtesy’ (translation: buzz off), and continued on. McCain later confronted Thurmond on the Senate floor. A scuffle ensued, and the two didn’t part friends.” (Harry Jaffe, “Senator Hothead,” The Washingtonian, 2/97)

Sen. McCain Attacked Christian Leaders And Republicans In A Blistering Speech During The 2000 Campaign. MCCAIN: “Unfortunately, Governor Bush is a Pat Robertson Republican who will lose to Al Gore. … The political tactics of division and slander are not our values… They are corrupting influences on religion and politics, and those who practice them in the name of religion or in the name of the Republican Party or in the name of America shame our faith, our party and our country. Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance, whether they be Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left, or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right.” (Sen. John McCain, Remarks, Virginia Beach, VA, 2/28/00)

Celebrating His First Senate Election In 1986, Sen. McCain Screamed At And Harassed A Young Volunteer. “It was election night 1986, John McCain had just been elected to the U.S. Senate for the first time. Even so, he was not in a good mood. McCain was yelling at the top of his lungs and poking the chest of a young volunteer who had set up a lectern that was too tall for the 5-foot-9 politician to be seen to advantage, according to a witness to the outburst. ‘Here this poor guy is thinking he has done a good job, and he gets a new butt ripped because McCain didn’t look good on television,’ Jon Hinz told a reporter Thursday. At the time, Hinz was executive director of the Arizona Republican Party. … ‘There were an awful lot of people in the room,’ Hinz recalled. ‘You’d have to stick cotton in your ears not to hear it. He (McCain) was screaming at him, and he was red in the face.’” (Kris Mayes and Charles Kelly, “Stories Surface On Senator’s Demeanor,” The Arizona Republic, 11/5/99)

Sen. McCain “Publicly Abused” Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL). “[McCain] noted his propensity for passion but insisted that he doesn’t ‘insult anybody or fly off the handle or anything like that.’ This is, quite simply, hogwash. McCain often insults people and flies off the handle…. There have been the many times McCain has called reporters ‘liars’ and ‘idiots’ when they have had the audacity to ask him unpleasant, but pertinent, questions. ” (Editorial, “There’s Something About McCain,” The Austin American-Statesman, 1/24/07) http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/news/presidential_briefing/?p=161

Is it any wonder McCain has few endorsements from his Congressional piers? http://thehill.com/endorsements-2008.html

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=john+mccain+congressional+staffers


23 posted on 01/27/2010 10:52:12 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

And what’s wrong with Americanization? This country is held together by its American culture, not by tied of blood or race. That’s the miracle of the United States and the genius of the founding fathers who set up this system where anyone can become an American if they drop their allegiance to their former countries. Yes, we can keep our family heritages but it has to be in the context of the greater American culture. Most of the ills of this country can be traced back to multiculturalism which leads to racial politics leading to the current fiasco in the White House.


24 posted on 01/27/2010 10:53:52 AM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

What I don’t understand is how rarely, if at all, the pro-amnesty/ open borders types DEBATE THE ISSUES instead of just name-call.

I HAVE had one open-borders-ey friend, a WSJ sort of guy (on this issue), calmly lay out why it would be good, long-term, for the USA to legalize illegals and admit (IMO) millions more largely unskilled, non-English-speaking, poorly-educated folks. (He thinks that raw population numbers are somehow very important in competing with China.)

He’s wrong, but, hey, at least he doesn’t engage in OMG YOU RACIST sorts of tactics.


25 posted on 01/27/2010 10:54:20 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I'm guessing that the author is in favor of immigration "reform" - which we all understand to truly mean "amnesty". There is a subset of libertarian Republicans who cannot seem to wrap their otherwise "open" minds around two vital facts:

1. a country without secure borders is not a secure country and will in time see its freedoms diminished and then threatened, and

2. if "citizenship" means anything at all, it refers to a common agreement to abide by the nation's laws and to accept the responsibilities that attend one's rights under those laws.

Illegal aliens fail on both counts and their continued presence in the US is harming the liberties of all. Accusing the opponents of open borders of prejudice and/or race hatred is a cheap way of avoiding argumentation and also, reality.

26 posted on 01/27/2010 10:54:24 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Bingo. I am confident that Palin has gotten word to Hayworth, in private, that “You understand I wouldn’t be where I am today if not for John McCain. I owe him this. I just want you to understand [wink wink].” And that is one honorable position for her to take, although there are others.


27 posted on 01/27/2010 10:56:06 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; rabscuttle385; All

“I am not suggesting JD Hayworth is promoting Nazism in Arizona and America”

THAT is exactly what this slanderous author is attempting.
There is no other purpose for writing this piece of tripe.

JD approved part of Henry Ford’s message, NOT the entire life of the guy. Strange isn’t it? Sarah Palin can praise McCAin ALL over the place, but we’re not supposed to take that seriously???

WOW. JUST WOW.


28 posted on 01/27/2010 10:58:49 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS
And what’s wrong with Americanization? This country is held together by its American culture, not by tied of blood or race. That’s the miracle of the United States and the genius of the founding fathers who set up this system where anyone can become an American if they drop their allegiance to their former countries. Yes, we can keep our family heritages but it has to be in the context of the greater American culture. Most of the ills of this country can be traced back to multiculturalism which leads to racial politics leading to the current fiasco in the White House.

BTT!!!

29 posted on 01/27/2010 11:01:12 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I believe that gravity points down.

Hitler did too.

Therefore, according to this writer, I approve Hitler’s approach. (OH BUT I’M NOT PROMOTING NAZISM; I’m just worth writing an article about, with lots of Hitler references.)


30 posted on 01/27/2010 11:01:48 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Kris Lorelli

Kristofer Lorelli Location Toronto, Ontario

Bio Kris is a writer for www.race42012.com. He is an avid fan of imported beer, soccer, live theatre, foreign-language cinema and the BBC world service.

31 posted on 01/27/2010 11:02:14 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
There is a subset of palinistas who live in world where the princess can do no wrong

My Princess is allowed to make mistakes, up until it no longer matters, and I would still vote for her, unless some one comes along that I could trust more, and I don't see that person yet, and doubt that I will.

32 posted on 01/27/2010 11:03:04 AM PST by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"I am not suggesting JD Hayworth is promoting Nazism in Arizona and America"

That's exactly what you are suggesting, scumbag.

33 posted on 01/27/2010 11:03:30 AM PST by free me (Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Sarah will not tolerate this. She knows what it’s like to be attacked!


34 posted on 01/27/2010 11:05:45 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I don’t have any problem with that. Or the occasional mis-step. My problem will be with the folks trying to sabotage a solid conservative like JD with cherry-picked “facts”. The guy is a superstar compared with McCain.


35 posted on 01/27/2010 11:05:53 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yes, another hit piece. This is nothing but guilt by association. Trashtalk!

Hayworth wants strong border security, no amnesty and defense of US sovereignty. McCain will grant amnesty to millions and millions of illegals. Not to mention his continued attempts to stifle free speech. The choice is clear.

GO JD GO!

36 posted on 01/27/2010 11:11:14 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; AuntB

Holy Crap. That explains ALOT! LOL


37 posted on 01/27/2010 11:11:48 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; pissant
Thank you very much for the information on McCain. It is good to know such instability.

Actually I am not a supporter of McCain unless forced into an untenable position. There are some worse than him.

He has been there too long. MO

If J. D. Is antisemitic, ... and Would not maintain support of our connection with Israel ... that is not a good candidate attitude either. The bad man I know is not as dangerous as the bad man I do not know usually. An unknown. MO

Tough choices. Between two evils.

38 posted on 01/27/2010 11:14:51 AM PST by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

see post 31. Explains everything


39 posted on 01/27/2010 11:32:37 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: geologist; AuntB

“And if we are honest we have to make a distinction between a democratic Israel that wants to live in peace and the terrorists who want Israel wiped out. The Israelis were told to give up land for peace; they gave up the land, but got no peace”.

JD Hayworth


40 posted on 01/27/2010 11:34:34 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Well what else is he going to do other than demonize...
The Tar-Pit that Obama would be Wise to Avoid
Kristopher Lorelli, a U.S. native who lives in Toronto, started a site, www.palinforvp.com, after reading Brickley's blog, and he attributes most of the publicity surrounding the governor to Brickley's initiative.
He supports Palin who chooses to support McLame.
41 posted on 01/27/2010 11:50:36 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geologist
My first thought was ... now I know why Sarah is not campaigning for J.D. Hayworth.

LOL!

42 posted on 01/27/2010 11:59:49 AM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

B U M P


43 posted on 01/27/2010 12:03:12 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS

I’m supporting JD Hayworth in this race (or whoever has the best chance of retiring McCain). Perhaps you meant to reply to someone else.


44 posted on 01/27/2010 12:39:53 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Guy hasn’t even announced he is running yet.

“We will formally announce at a later time, but we’re moving forward to challenge John McCain.”

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/01/27/mccain-challenger-j-d-hayworth-is-no-conservative-hero/


45 posted on 01/27/2010 12:54:07 PM PST by NoLibZone (Be of good cheer True Conservatives- McCain could have won! Right? /Sarc . Tis Why We Support Brown!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

All these guys have “formal announcements” at some point. He just quit his job as a popular talk radio host. Ya think he’s not running?


46 posted on 01/27/2010 1:24:39 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: geologist

Don’t fall for this ‘anti-semantic’ hype. It’s a lie.
Curiously, it’s usually calling him a Mexican Hater that the libs/McCain use.

Blast from the past, words from J.D. Hayworth:

“When you see the Mexican flags and other flags - rather than American flags - being hoisted at these demonstrations, you essentially are getting this message: ‘Yes, we are here illegally. No, we do not believe this to be your country. We do not believe in your laws . . . and we don’t believe you’re going to do anything about it.’” - Rep. J.D. Hayworth (AZ-R) -

However, Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ) has taken the lead in the fight to stop the U.S.-Mexico totalization agreement from taking effect. (Trying to stop giving illegal aliens social security benefits) He has introduced H. Res. 20, a resolution of disapproval in the House.

REP. J.D. HAYWORTH, (R) ARIZONA: If there are so-called good people overstaying their visas, there are really bad people too. And more than just your garden variety of criminal, probably in that group, sad to say, are those folks who belong to terrorist cells who mean to do us harm.

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2010/01/there-is-hope-jd-hayworth-challeges.html

Another poster said: “The former mayor lied like a rug, and scammed the populace by pretending to run to the right of Hayworth regarding illegal immigration.”

This is a good point to remember. The former mayor, Harry Mitchell did just that with lots of big democrat money, like Charlie Rangel.

“Former Tempe Mayor and state Sen. Harry Mitchell is also trying to use one of Hayworth’s signature issues — illegal immigration — against him, saying that after six terms in office, Hayworth and the Republican Party have done nothing to curb the problem, which affects Arizona more than most states. ....The results were initially so close that Hayworth would not concede for a week while early ballots were counted. “

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,214241,00.html
http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Harry_Mitchell

The biggest reason JD lost in Arizona was that he voted against HR 4437 (Immigration, ID, etc). His opponent used that vote to imply he wasn’t strong on border issues. JD issued a statement the day of the vote saying he was not voting for it because it didn’t go far enough and fix enough. And he was right.

Hayworth Efforts Stymied

In the spirit of his own bill, H.R. 3938, the Enforcement First Immigration Reform Act, Rep. J.D. Hayworth sought to strengthen H.R. 4437 on the House floor by offering a series of seven amendments. All of these amendments, taken together, were designed to demonstrate there is no need for an amnesty/guestworker plan. As a package these amendments would first give enforcement a chance to weed out scofflaw employers, limit the work incentives driving illegal immigration, and set the stage for U.S. workers to become more attractive as employees than illegal workers. These amendments required:

* IRS enforcement of laws fining employers filing false data on illegal employees.
* Information sharing between IRS and DHS.
* A ban on bank acceptance of matricula consular cards.
* Increase the number of DHS employees investigating illegal employment.
* Transfer family based visas to employment-based visas.
* Eliminate the visa lottery program and transfer those visas to employment-based visas.
* Express the sense of congress that no guestworker program should be enacted until enforcement of immigration law is accomplished.

Unfortunately only one of these amendments was made in order for debate during floor consideration of H.R. 4437. That was the amendment-the one least preferred by Rep. Hayworth-to demonstrate an alternative to a guestworker program by reducing family based visas and increasing employment-based visas by an equal amount. Ultimately, Rep. Hayworth withdrew this amendment, fearing its defeat would give encouragement to amnesty/guestworker supporters.

http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=leg_analysis_hr4437#hayworth


47 posted on 01/27/2010 1:28:20 PM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

anti-semantic or anti-semitic? ;o)


48 posted on 01/27/2010 1:47:10 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

It was more of a general reply to the posting, not to you personally. Sorry for any misunderstandings.


49 posted on 01/27/2010 4:29:14 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Are you a supporter of J.D? Is he a man of his word and integrity, with basic conservative values?

There is always flack that distracts from the main issues. McCain is not really a man I would vote for ... yet ... preferred before a progressive. We do not want to lose any seat in the Senate held by a conservative. Being from Texas, my knowledge of other potential candidates is mostly sketchy.

50 posted on 01/29/2010 8:18:16 AM PST by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson