Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid (WTH??)
Breitbart ^ | 1/31/10 | staff

Posted on 01/31/2010 11:39:15 AM PST by pissant

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; brown2012; democrats; elections; gop; idiot; republicans; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last
To: toddausauras

Good points, Todd.

I personally think running for Pres is too much of a stretch for Brown right now, and even though I’ve been a Palin supporter, on this forum, since 2007...before McCain even heard of her, it’s too soon for her, right now.


121 posted on 01/31/2010 2:22:38 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I guess he should have sworn on the Bible right then & there NOT to run for Pres. Would that do it for you?


122 posted on 01/31/2010 2:25:03 PM PST by molybdenum ( Now go do the right thing!------Dr Laura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Hey, I love ol’ Dick. Gettin’ up there in years, and his hearts not the best, and he sure did pass his genes on to Liz.

(I even combed my hair like DC. Didn’t take much.)


123 posted on 01/31/2010 2:25:24 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: norge

Norge, What do you think of a “Reagan ‘76-’80” type drive for Sarah? In other words run an honorable campaign in 2012, try to get through gaff-less. Then if it doesn’t work out the public is more used to her and in 2016 run again and win.


124 posted on 01/31/2010 2:25:27 PM PST by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Nope. I have a wonderful life and many blessings to be thankful for. However, you might be amused to know that I was thinking the same thing about you (pathetic, miserable).


125 posted on 01/31/2010 2:25:34 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

That could work for me, although I would hope that in 2012, we can retire the Oman.

I still think it’s premature to pick a candidate at this point. I just want to make sure that we aren’t in a position to tell Newt it’s “his turn.”


126 posted on 01/31/2010 2:27:54 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: norge

Retiring the Oman is number one top priority.


127 posted on 01/31/2010 2:30:48 PM PST by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: norge
Hahahahaha!

Just give him a segway, 24/7 heart monitor and
a shotgun and he's good to go!

Cheney/Krauthammer '12!

128 posted on 01/31/2010 2:33:50 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
What grumpy old dudes? Do you measure grumpy as being pro life?

No, I don't measure grumpy as being pro-life. Actually, this doesn't have much to do with policy as presentation.

This is funny coming from me, grumpy old dudette extraordinaire, but too many high-profile Republican officials and pundits are men in their late 60s and early 70s (and they've been in office or on television for 20 or 25 years). At that age, Reagan was still charming and quick on his feet, but these guys sit stone-faced with their arms folded across their chests (bad body language). Some of them have the same bad haircuts (must use the same barber in the Congressional barbershop); and John Boehner looks ridiculous with that spray tan (at the Baltimore caucus retreat, Boehner was darker than Obama!).

In terms of the media, Palin gets it. Brown gets it. You have to be engaging.

129 posted on 01/31/2010 2:36:49 PM PST by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yeah, and Pataki started looking at the White House as soon as Cuomo left Albany. That did him a lot of good.


130 posted on 01/31/2010 2:41:34 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Obi-Wan Palin: Strike her down and she shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He thanks "independents" when it was conservatives who powered his victory

I don't agree with that.

I'm am in MA now, listening to people talking about that election. I didn't ask questions, people are just talking.

May take is Brown won because he said he was voting against health care.

I think voters saw him as neither democrat nor republican, rather a combination of both, and that quality led independents and some democrats to vote for him 'in spite of' his republican affiliation.

131 posted on 01/31/2010 2:42:36 PM PST by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Hasn't this country learned its lesson by electing a man with no practical (executive) leadership experience? Why would we settle for someone just because he's (allegedly) a conservative?

We can do better. We have to.

132 posted on 01/31/2010 2:44:50 PM PST by rintense (Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Cheney/Krauthammer '12!

There wouldn't be enough Rolaids to keep the Dems in stock, if that were to happen.

133 posted on 01/31/2010 2:45:22 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

You’re right, Nateman. They are just waiting for Scott Brown to blunder so it will make the headlines. (Unfortunately, if his wife or those two darling daughters of his put a foot wrong, it’ll make national headlines.) In my opinion, Massachusetts is not certifying him until Feb 11th for l) spite, and 2) to let the Dem. crooks ram their crap through before he can vote.


134 posted on 01/31/2010 2:53:30 PM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, that was quick...


135 posted on 01/31/2010 2:54:37 PM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

His constituents are not representative of the Republican party, nor of ‘middle America’.


136 posted on 01/31/2010 2:55:27 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I definitely would not vote for him.


137 posted on 01/31/2010 3:01:37 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norge

They’re all posting from just the title....and the title alone. Move along, business as usual.


138 posted on 01/31/2010 3:03:47 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Somebody needs to have a man to man talk with this guy, he’s got stars in his eyes.


139 posted on 01/31/2010 3:05:18 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
He would have more experience than 0 did when he ran.
140 posted on 01/31/2010 3:06:03 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson