Skip to comments.EDITORIAL: Homosexuals disappointed again
Posted on 02/03/2010 8:23:35 PM PST by Abakumov
Homosexuals waiting to serve openly in the armed forces will have to keep waiting. President Obama is effectively putting this issue to bed until after the November elections....
Mr. Obama's supporters among the homosexual activist community have been increasingly restive over his failure to address the issue. A liberal Democratic president with huge margins in both houses should be able to deliver on such an important election promise, but Mr. Obama lacks stamina even on issues he says he cares about passionately. In order to claim some forward movement, the administration is reportedly constructing a more lenient enforcement framework, but this had already been the practice under George W. Bush's administration, during which gay discharges dropped more than 50 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I suppose the fag contingent would rather Obama have brought on a Republican stampede in November.
LOL. Thanks for the laugh.
MSNBC is reporting on this like it will be passed by congress tomorrow. They got all their generals saying homos should be able to openly look for sexual partners in the military and will make us stronger. Such crap!
The homos doth whine too much.
>>President Obama is effectively putting this issue to bed until after the November elections....
Gates maybe smarter than we think. The brass knew they have a idiot Marxist as CIC for the next 2 years so they have to come up with ways to fool the ZerO. That “1 year to make a panel to study the effects of homosexuals for transition” was a good one.
Hm, did somebody change the headline? “Obama sticks it to gays again” was the headline I was referring to as ‘unfortunate’...
That was my interpretation actually. :)
“Weren’t you on a poster for gonorrhea?” /friends
1) hate crimes attached to the military budget
2) Miranda Rights to combatants, treating them as citizens
3) dumping the 'Don't ask-Don't tell'
Yep, they have a new strategy...all military will declare themselves gay... and since all combatants are to have citizens rights, they can be charged as citizens, too!
Just because they are too lazy and gutless to pursue happiness with memebers of the opposite sex in a normal, potentially reproductive relationship for the benefit of continuing the human race, doesn't mean I must honor some artificial extra-constitutional "right(s)" as an abused member of some racial minority. It's just not gonna happen!!!
I know this is difficult when some family member chooses this route to supposed happiness, or when some friend of the family, or even some admired person like Dick Cheney has a family member with such a "bent," but that's just tough!!!
I have freedom of association in this country and I will not be forced to act out some PC "acceptance" of this "lifestyle" that is a choice, not an inheritantly natural condition. Expecially on the field of combat, or it's preparatory excercises or institutions commissioned with defending my nation!!!
We keep letting them push their way in the schools and into the military and use hate crimes laws to silence the church and anyone inthr scientific community who dares oppose them and it won’t belong before everyone every man woman and child will be forced to bow to the legion of deviants or else.
Let the dykes in cause they can probably fight, but jeez keep the nancy boys out! Just what we need, a bunch of limp wrists running around with weapons. They’ll break all of France’s records for fast surrender.
Hmmm. I would have thought that the homo’s would be used to taking it up the tailpipe when it comes to politicians!!!
The only thing Americans can agree on anymore is that Obama is a major disappointment.
Ooooooohhhhh they’re cute.....(Sarc.)
Obama sticks it to gays again
Hey; they loved it girlfriend.
Max Klinger never claimed to be gay, he only claimed to be crazy—in fact, in one episode the psychiatrist Sidney Freedman suggested he might be gay, and Max freaked out because it was the farthest thing from the truth.
You need a different poster boy for DADT!
I believe that usage is in the New York Times, AP and other style books. First reference in an article is to “President” whoever. After that it is “Mr.” whoever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.