Posted on 02/09/2010 6:47:51 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
Evidentally, Nicole Wallace told Governor Palin that dirty-dancer Katie was a friend of hers and that KT just loved the guv and wanted to interview her.
Something is utterly ODD here.
WHY would Little Miss Katie Couric assist Mitt Romney's aide in slurring Governor Palin??? Surly KT is a far left Democrat?
Right??
Anyone happen to know if Katie Couric is Mormon? WHAT, precisely is the connection between Little Miss Misfit Nicole Wallace and her BFF KT Couric????
As to the truth of the facts stated in the letter, a prior poster noted that the 11 AP fact checkers (I await any fact checking on Obama from these turkeys) didn't contradict Dewey's points, a good reason to believe the letter's content is true as well.
Just keep ignoring the fact that she's also Pro-RKBA, pro-life, pro-Constitution, pro-limited government, pro-free markets, etc...
Comparing her to Zero isn't just intellectually lazy, it's outright dishonest.
CBC was busted by the Feds, sara had no hand
ACES - thousands unemployed, little new drilling (see Faces of ACES ad)
All but a fraction of pork was taken and the legislature took that over saras objections
she also grew state govt by 38% (more state drones) and the anti-development asshats she appointed are still in charge at DNR.
Unemployement is climbig.
Others have posted similar, you should really do your own reseach and not take a world view from “email from a friend” you will likely be a happier perso.
Right click, save as...
I know him personally.
Yes, he is real!
Yeah, thanks for the info.
You can take your psychological advice and stick it, though...I am thoroughly happy. :)
The truth about Sarah is in her record for all to read if they just took the time and trouble to do so. Go Sarah.
Two talking points for her in all her speeches (after she slams the global warming shake down scam) should be energy independence for the US and cleaning house of corruption in political office.
She should mention that increasing oil drilling leases on US soil was quite profitable for Alaska and could also be profitable for US States plus help lift the burden off the socialists’ deficit.
But the time the election comes around the US is going to be in a shortage of oil with high prices; the global warming scam will have totally angered everyone plus the false promise of “alternative energy” and no one knows more on how to deal with that than Sarah Palin.
As far as political corruption and cutting fat, she knows how to take care of that more successfully than anyone who could run against her, too.
bump for later
You are correct that “real deals’ do not quit before their term expires to make money.
Not all of this email is fact. You cannot find a list of people she put in prison because there are none. Some people cannot let facts get in the way of reality.
How about the fact if she hadn’t gone after Ted Stevens, he would have been reelected as a Senator and Obamacare and others things would not have passed as the Dem from AK voted with Obama while Stevens was found innocent in federal court of the charges. Her attacks on Young that led to charges were dismissed, but fortunately he did win his House seat.
Much of this email was crap the first time I read it and it has not changed.
Don’t see the difference in the Obama or Palin fan clubs who continue to defend both no matter what.
You have nailed it — thanks for your post!
Fact finds:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/texarkana-tx/TK7HA9DGDS13PT5V0
per factcheck:
Whetsell’s Claim: Democrats forget when Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because as soon as Palin took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits The Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, “la la la la” (well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that has ever done anything similar.
Mosly False: It’s true that Palin defeated Frank Murkowski, the Republican incumbent, in the Republican gubernatorial primary in 2006. But the remainder of Whetsell’s tale is off the mark.
The “Corrupt Bastards Club” refers to a group of Alaska lawmakers who were brought up on charges of bribery, conspiracy and extortion for their connections with Veco Corp., an oil field services and construction contractor, between 2006 and 2008. A number of the people involved, including former state Rep. Tom Anderson and former state Rep. Vic Kohring, were sentenced to serve time in prison. But it wasn’t Palin’s office that led the investigation that resulted in several lawmakers and executives being put away. The federal investigation was headed by the FBI, along with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service. Whetsell seemingly acknowledged this point when he posted the piece on his blog, saying: “Oops, I shouldn’t have used the ‘CBC’(Corrupt Bastards Club) depiction, which was a different unrelated event, but instead used ‘GOB’(Good Ol’ Boys). Sarah’s narrative is accurate, mine is funny.”
Palin does have a history of taking on established members of her party and in at least two prominent cases she “sent them packing.” But that was before she was governor, and they didn’t end up in jail “wearing orange jump suits.” While serving as a member of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Palin, acting on tips from members of her staff, questioned whether fellow commission member, Alaska Republican Party Chairman Randy Ruedrich, used his public office to engage in political business for the state Republican Party. The allegations led to an investigation, and Ruedrich subsequently resigned from the commission. He later reached a deal with the state under which he admitted to violating state ethics laws and agreed to pay a $12,000 fine. Palin also went after former Alaska Attorney General Gregg Renkes in 2003, alleging that he stood to benefit financially from a state coal trading deal (which Renkes had pushed) involving a company in which the attorney general owned stock. The Alaska Personnel Board went on to withdraw its complaint against Renkes, but he had already stepped down as attorney general anyway.
more?
Sharing Oil Profits
Whetsell claim: Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new system of splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t let the door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed, and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being filthy rich. Of course, the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done anything similar.
Mostly True: The Alaska Legislature adopted a plan proposed by Palin in 2007 (Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share) that raised the tax that oil companies have to pay on their profits from a base rate of 22.5 percent to 25 percent. Oil companies, including ExxonMobil, opposed the tax hike, claiming it would affect their project investments. The revenue generated from the tax increase, which significantly added to the state’s budget surplus, allowed Palin’s administration to issue a one time “resource rebate” of $1,200 to eligible state residents in 2008 to help with increasing energy prices. The rebate came in addition to the annual dividend check ($2,069 in 2008) that residents receive as their part of the state’s oil wealth. Whether this classifies as making residents “filthy rich” is a matter of opinion, though. Palin got the idea from a Republican legislator, according to the Anchorage Daily News:
Anchorage Daily News, Aug. 8, 2008: It was Palin, after all, who last month proposed that lawmakers pay out a $1,200 resource rebate as a way for the state to share some of its multibillion-dollar oil revenue surplus with Alaska residents.
The idea for a people’s payment, however, originated in January with Haines Republican Rep. Bill Thomas, a commercial fisherman who suggested a $1,000 rebate, saying he was moved by a legally blind and diabetic friend forced to cut firewood for lack of money to buy heating fuel.
SOUNDS LIKE SOCIALISM!
Cutting Earmarks
Whetsell Claim: The other thing she did when she walked into the governor’s office is she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known as “pork.” She went through the list, took 85% of them and placed them in the “when-hell-freezes-over “ stack. She let locals know that if we need something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous governor’s jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook (remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning - I imagine - that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to hear the names of those other governors.
Mixture of true and misleading: Palin sold the governor’s jet that Murkowski purchased during his time as governor. She also opted not to have a chef in the governor’s mansion. But Palin didn’t “dismiss” her entire security force, as Whetsell suggests. According to the Anchorage Daily News, at one point during her administration, Palin “saved an additional $125,000 by reducing her security staff.” The paper quoted a Palin aide saying that the positions were added back later, though. Palin also didn’t give up her state-issued Chevy Suburban until after she learned that she would have to pay taxes on whatever personal travel for which the vehicle was used.
And the claim that Palin cut earmarks 85 percent is misleading. Palin wrote in a March 2008 op-ed in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner that “[o]ne of my goals as governor is making Alaska as self-sufficient as possible.” But she also wrote that “I am also mindful of the role that the federal government plays in our state. The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship.” In the 2008 op-ed, Palin herself claimed to have cut the dollar value of earmarks between her first and second year in office by 63 percent. But the Seattle Times found that the decrease was actually 22 percent, according to records released by Palin’s office.
Point Thomson
Whetsell’s Claim: For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn’t start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No governor for 30 years could make them get started. Then, she told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the way to the court house. Alaska won again.
Misleading: ExxonMobil was one of the companies that had acquired leases to drill at Alaska’s Point Thomson field. And in January, while Palin was still governor, the oil giant was allowed to begin setting up two wells on two of the leases. The field went more than two decades without any of the leaseholders doing any drilling, which they blamed on the lack of a gas pipeline and other complications with the land. ExxonMobil was motivated to finally move forward with drilling when the state moved to revoke its leases. But that process began under the Murkowski administration; Palin continued what her predecessor had started. As the Anchorage Daily News reported:
Anchorage Daily News, Dec. 27, 2008: The state’s move to reclaim Point Thomson began under former Gov. Frank Murkowski’s administration in 2005, when the state’s oil and gas director at the time, Mark Myers, rejected Exxon’s “plan of development” for the field. It was the 22nd such plan the company had filed over the years.
Myers faulted the plan’s lack of a firm commitment to produce oil and gas. He said Exxon’s “30-year record of nondevelopment and delay … makes a mockery” of lease obligations.
The state had moved to cancel leases before, but never on such a prize as Point Thomson, or against so formidable an opponent as Exxon.
“Some have questioned our rationale,” Murkowski would tell Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce audience. “Some have questioned our sanity.”
After Gov. Sarah Palin unseated her fellow Republican in the 2006 election, she picked up what Murkowski started and has continued efforts to wrest control of Point Thomson away from Exxon and the other leaseholders.
Alaska’s Renewable Energy
Whetsell’s Claim: President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for Alaska to be at 50% renewables by 2025. We are already at 25%.
True: On the campaign trail, President Obama promised to require that 25 percent of the country’s electrical energy be generated by renewable sources by the year 2025. Palin, in January of this year, set an even higher production goal for Alaska: 50 percent of electrical energy from renewable sources by 2025. But is Alaska already producing 25 percent of its electricity from renewable sources? Nearly so, according to Peter Crimp, program manager for the Alaska Energy Authority.
Crimp told us that according to the 2007 Alaska Renewable Energy Atlas (based on a 2001 assessment), 24 percent of Alaska’s electrical energy (not including heating and transportation fuels) is made from renewable sources — mostly hydroelectric power. The Energy Information Administration also says that “hydroelectric power supplies about one-fifth” of Alaska’s electricity generation.
Additional info: currently 24%, has been for many years (prior to SP); Governor Parnell got Bill HB 306 passed and Sarah is no where listed on the thing. Regardless, it’s a long way off, the bill has loose language, and it’s a high-reaching overly-ambitious piece of legislation. I wish them the best, just the same!
http://gov.state.ak.us/parnell/press-room/full-press-release.html?pr=5424
now to the issue with Mrs Obama from scopesdotcom:
In the past it’s been almost a tradition for America’s first ladies to catch flack from their husbands’ political opponents over the size of their staffs, and Michelle Obama certainly hasn’t been exempt from that. Criticism of her “massive” staff has popped up on email chains, blogs, and chat rooms. But what are the facts regarding how many people are under her employ, and how does the size of her staff compare to that of past first ladies?
On July 1st of this year, the Obama White House posted the Annual Report to Congress on White House Staff on its official blog. A minor uproar over the first lady’s staff size ensued. One critic at CanadianFreePress.com accused the president’s wife of employing an “unprecedented number of staffers” for someone who “doesn’t perform any official duties,” while a widely circulated chain email reported that “there has never been anyone in the White House at any time that has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady’s social life.” Many other critics of the Obama administration expressed similar sentiments.
Soon after the minor brouhaha erupted, Factcheck.org looked into the matter and discovered that there are 16 White House staffers with the term “first lady” in their job title, along with eight additional staffers who also provide support to Michelle Obama, bringing the total number of paid first lady aides to 24, two more staffers than the number noted in the aforementioned chain email circulated by Obama critics. Michelle Obama’s press secretary, Katie McCormick Lelyveld, confirmed that 24 was an accurate count of staffers working for the current first lady.
So just what does a staff of 24 do for Michelle Obama? Well, for starters there are the 32,000 pieces of mail that have flooded the East Wing since Michelle Obama took occupancy in January, but the main official duty of the first lady is to tend to the care and maintenance of the White House and its seemingly endless social functions. Of course some first ladies, like Michelle Obama, maintain a higher profile than others, and with that comes the need for people to help write speeches, arrange travel and security details, handle media inquiries, etc. About the myriad tasks and responsibilities handled by White House staffers, Anita McBride, Laura Bush’s former chief of staff, recently said, “There’s never enough people to do the amount of work that has to get done.”
As far as Michelle Obama’s staff size being “unprecedented” in modern times, this appears to be factually inaccurate. According to the Washington Post, the Bush White House also had 16 people on staff whose official titles included the term “first lady” working for Laura Bush, and a recent AP story placed her total number of staffers at between 24 and 26. The same AP report also noted that Hillary Clinton had up to 19 staffers, while Lady Bird Johnson and Jacqueline Kennedy had 30 and 40, respectively. To that end, Snopes.com , another Web site dedicated to checking the facts on issues prominent in the public discourse, described the claims of Michelle Obama’s “unprecedented” staff as “grossly inaccurate” and “on par with her predecessor’s.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.