Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing's 747-8 freighter completes first flight
Associated Press ^ | 02/10/2010 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/09/2010 7:41:34 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

– Boeing Co.'s giant 747-8 freighter — the biggest plane the company has ever built — successfully completed its first flight Monday, a year later than originally planned.

The huge plane took off from Everett's Paine Field shortly after noon and returned to Paine at 4:18 p.m. PST after an approximately 3 1/2-hour flight.

A crowd Boeing estimated at more than 5,000 employees, customers, suppliers and other airplane fans gathered to watch the plane take to the air. The flight came just one day short of the 41st anniversary of the first flight of the original 747 model.

At 250 feet long — more than twice the length of the Wright Brothers' first flight — the plane is about 18 feet longer than the existing 747-400 jumbo jet. The company conducted taxi tests on the freighter Saturday, with the aircraft performing well, Boeing said.

"The airplane performed as expected and handled just like a 747-400," said 747 Chief Pilot Mark Feuerstein, who was joined on the flight deck by Capt. Tom Imrich.

Monday's flight around western Washington began a testing program that will involve more than 1,600 flight hours. As pilots checked basic handling and engine performance, the plane reached a cruising altitude of 17,000 feet and speeds as high as 264 miles per hour.

Boeing also is developing a passenger version of the plane. It lists 76 orders for the freighter and 32 for the 747-8 passenger jet, with the vast majority from international customers.

The company says the jets will be much quieter, more fuel efficient and have lower emissions than current 747-400 models.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 747; 7478; aerospace; airplane; boeing; freighter

1 posted on 02/09/2010 7:41:35 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

What will its top speed be? 264 mph is a bit pokey as jets go.


2 posted on 02/09/2010 7:44:56 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
The company says the jets will be much quieter, more fuel efficient and have lower emissions than current 747-400 models.

Quitter, more fuel efficient, lower emission? What the difference does it make? Boeing don't manufacture jet engines. It's the G.E. and Pratt&Whitney or Rolls Royce... BS!

3 posted on 02/09/2010 7:50:22 PM PST by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

264 was just the test flight. I imagine that it will top out at about 550 mph.


4 posted on 02/09/2010 7:50:59 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

just what the world needs.

greater dependence on middle east oil


5 posted on 02/09/2010 7:51:06 PM PST by element92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Maybe it isn’t as simple as jack up plane, put in new green engine? I’d think the cockpit has to be made to match.


6 posted on 02/09/2010 7:53:51 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: element92

How about a natural gas version?


7 posted on 02/09/2010 7:54:21 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I believe it will cruise at Mach .86 or a little faster. The cruise for a -400 was in the .84 to .86 range.


8 posted on 02/09/2010 7:56:02 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: element92

“just what the world needs.

greater dependence on middle east oil”

Strapping a loaded pallet on the back of a carrier pigeon just won’t work, no matter what Algore says.


9 posted on 02/09/2010 7:57:55 PM PST by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

What are the main differences in addition to the fuel, quieter?


10 posted on 02/09/2010 8:14:54 PM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

when people buy Chinese made trinkets online,

they just got to have them tomorrow,

not next week,

I guess


11 posted on 02/09/2010 8:16:17 PM PST by element92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Quix
It has a longer fuselage surpassing the Airbus A340. It is also the heaviest aircraft, commercial or military, manufactured in the United States. On the passenger version of the plane,the 747-8 will feature a new solid-state light-emitting diode (LED) lighting system, which can create moods lighting.This new LED technology provides lower maintenance costs.
12 posted on 02/09/2010 8:21:24 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Ahhhh. Thanks.

Any news on not having to have a shoehorn to get in and out of the economy seats?


13 posted on 02/09/2010 8:32:38 PM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
What will its top speed be? 264 mph is a bit pokey as jets go.

It's cruise speed is supposed to be Mach 0.86 compared to to the 747-400's cruise at Mach 0.85, or the 747-200 at 0.84. Air Force One, a highly modified 747-200, often flies at Mach 0.92+.

14 posted on 02/09/2010 9:04:59 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Especially if it is an LD-7 or LD-3!


15 posted on 02/09/2010 9:05:40 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove; Quix
This new LED technology provides lower maintenance costs.

It should help increase range by decreasing the electricity needed to run the lights.

16 posted on 02/09/2010 9:08:03 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

~660 mph, that’s considerably zippier.


17 posted on 02/09/2010 9:08:10 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Haven’t they been using fluorescents already for decades? This is efficiency competitive with LED and much cheaper, though not as long lived.


18 posted on 02/09/2010 9:10:37 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ahhhh.

Thx.


19 posted on 02/09/2010 9:16:24 PM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

But aren’t fluorescents bulkier and heavier? It’s not just how efficient they are, it also matters how much they weigh. Fluorescents also have a rather unnatural an unflattering discontinuous spectrum that tends to be greenish. LED’s can be made to look more like daylight.


20 posted on 02/09/2010 9:29:01 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

It’s possible to fiddle with the spectrum of a fluorescent by using a different mix of phosphors. The better phosphors cost more. An RGB LED array (I don’t know if this craft is using that kind, or just a plain “white” excited-phosphor light) would indeed have the ability to shed different hues of light.


21 posted on 02/09/2010 9:33:21 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quix

It should be 33 % quieter..


22 posted on 02/10/2010 12:08:42 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

THX.

33% is quite a change.

Nevertheless, to me, the biggest issue is needing a big shoehorn to get in and out of the seats.

BTW, I’m not that fat. 6’1” 200 lbs. or less.


23 posted on 02/10/2010 5:44:33 AM PST by Quix ( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Air tests are never conducted at full bore the first flight out, they are gradually worked up to maximum. This saves on prototypes and pilots by reducing the number of crashes that might occur if they hopped into the plane and put the throttle to the wall.


24 posted on 02/10/2010 7:24:31 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson