Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Is Making Plans to Use Executive Power for Action on Several Fronts
nytimes.com ^ | Feb. 12, 2010 | PETER BAKER

Posted on 02/12/2010 7:50:23 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: Ronin
Dictator, a little dictator in this case who will back down very quickly and runs away when someone stands up to him.
41 posted on 02/12/2010 8:17:50 PM PST by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; STARWISE; Liz; SE Mom; SoCalPol
I think we all knew Rahm's behind it. Clinton used it to grab the land in Utah.

- - -

It is quite common for US Presidents to issue executive orders that instruct federal agencies to promulgate administrative regulations in order to circumvent the legislative process in the US Congress altogether, though, as alluded to above, this can violate the US Constitution in a number of ways.

US Presidents are quite aware that US congressional politics can defeat or otherwise prevent the passage of legislation presidents deem politically important. In this regard, US Presidents have issued executive orders calling upon federal agencies, such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Department of Energy (DOE), to issue administrative regulations where the political process of adopting congressional legislation necessary to implement multilateral environmental regulatory treaty obligations a president wishes for the US to assume would prevent US ratification of/accession to that treaty.

US Presidents, furthermore, may use an executive order or a presidential memorandum to ensure that federal courts abide by international tribunal rulings interpreting the provisions of an international treaty.

Perhaps, President Obama has in mind to pursue one or both of these uses of executive orders to ensure the US abides by any successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, even though the US has remained a non-party to both treaties for political reasons.


42 posted on 02/12/2010 8:18:31 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
In close proximity to Monica, no doubt.

Cheers!

43 posted on 02/12/2010 8:19:05 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
God forgive me, but I miss Clinton. At least we KNEW where his head was.

We knew where the smaller one was. With Monica!

44 posted on 02/12/2010 8:19:26 PM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
What does this mean?

After a bipartisan furor in Congress last year, Mr. Obama stopped issuing such signing statements, but aides said last month that he still reserves the right to ignore sections of bills he considers unconstitutional if objections have been lodged previously by the executive branch.

45 posted on 02/12/2010 8:20:07 PM PST by submarinerswife (Obama, the Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

When he signs the first one, we all need to meet in D.C. with the torches and pitchforks and Inform him, we will no longer tolerate his thuggery!


46 posted on 02/12/2010 8:20:32 PM PST by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

And so it begins.


47 posted on 02/12/2010 8:21:58 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Its time to CLEARLY threaten a huge, middle-class American TAX REVOLT in Tea Party signs & placards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

They rarely do. Each succeeding president for the most part retains the work of past presidents as they use them as precedent. The continuing evolution of the imperial; presidency. Notice how many executive orders Obama is reversing? Not many at all...


48 posted on 02/12/2010 8:22:43 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Obama is not alone.

Obama has surrounded himself with radical nationalist socialists. Its our duty to rid America of them and their kind.

49 posted on 02/12/2010 8:22:48 PM PST by Candor7 (((The effective weapons against Oba- Fascism are ridicule, derision , truth (.Member NRA)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Obama has a passion for flipping the bird doesn’t he?


50 posted on 02/12/2010 8:23:51 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

>> Obama has surrounded himself with radical nationalist socialists.

You misunderstand. It’s the teleprompters. They’re raised too high.


51 posted on 02/12/2010 8:24:11 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
God forgive me, but I miss Clinton. At least we KNEW where his head was.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I hear you.

52 posted on 02/12/2010 8:24:33 PM PST by truthkeeper ("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Yes it is.

Liberty is at stake and the clock is ticking. We don’t have a constitutional government. The ONLY thing preventing Obama from doing what he wants is the fact that we have an armed populace.

The Japanese in WW2 were correct to say they would never invade the USA because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass. If Obama did what he wanted to, those 2 million that marched on DC in the Tea Party march will swell to about 10 million overnight, and those occupying the halls of congress and the White House would suddenly find themselves faced with a very large and angry populace on their doorsteps. Even HE fears that.

That is the ONLY thing staying their hands now. IMHO.

People don’t get just how serious this is. This is an issue that MUST be decided one way or another. As far as I can see historically, that means Obambi is out on his ass, or in Prison Orange with Nancy. Best thing for the bastard to do is resign and get a pardon from Biden. But Bambi IS NOT that smart and his damned ego is too big, so to the abyss we go.

THROW THE USURPER OBAMA OUT! NOW.


53 posted on 02/12/2010 8:25:29 PM PST by Danae (Don't like our Constitution? Try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 240B; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities
Thanks Free ThinkerNY.
54 posted on 02/12/2010 8:29:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks for the info and the link. I didn’t realize how vague the rule is. Recess appointments I can deal with, John Bolton was a great asset. Using it to implement laws congress, which is our voice, refuses to pass has to be questionable.


55 posted on 02/12/2010 8:29:18 PM PST by bleach (Sarah, Wake me in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


56 posted on 02/12/2010 8:30:28 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bleach

Let him truly anger the electorate.
He’ll take down every democrat with him.


57 posted on 02/12/2010 8:31:25 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: bleach
Can those be over ridden by congress in the future? Say 2011 with the new conservative majority? I hope.

Doubtful it would help. First, they would have to write a law to counteract the executive order, then get it passed through both houses of Congress then get the President's signature or override his veto. Since the Democrats will either continue to have majorities in both chambers or, at the very least, be able to sustain a veto override, it wouldn't be worth the effort unless the EO was so offensive that even a large contingent of Democrats believed it went too far.

58 posted on 02/12/2010 8:33:26 PM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

LOL! Who knew that Clintigula would be so soon replaced by Obamageddon? And the beast was not hillary with her cankles and cloven hooves, but a short wispy sulpher eater named Rahm??


59 posted on 02/12/2010 8:34:23 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Abuse of Power

an impeachable offense.”

I would have said that in ALL-CAPS. ABUSE OF POWER, AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE! Obama is a wanna-be DICTATOR! And that, folks, doesn’t set well with the majority of Americans. Obama and his thugs don’t seem to understand that.


60 posted on 02/12/2010 8:35:00 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson