Climate science: Credibility at risk, scientists say

Science News ^ | Feb. 20, 2010 | Janet Raloff

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[SaraJohnson]

The BIG clue for any field of research is when the “scientists” act like radicals in spitting absolute hatred for anyone who questions their research or comes up with different results than they did.

Real scientists don’t do this. They do not mind the back and forth required for the advancement of science. Folks who have sold out science for a personal enrichment scheme, political or social cause do this hate and hysteria thing against questioning scientific “enemies.” Ethical, successful and professional scientists don’t act like this.

As soon as we heard the watermelons of “climate research” screeching “denier” like some religious cult or communist, we should have known the whole operation was bogus. Then you follow the money and power to find out why the “scientists” are faking it.

[hinckley buzzard]

There have been plenty of passionate disagreements in the history of science, and scientists have not always conducted themselves with decorum. What makes this fraud unique is that there has been a concerted effort by the AGW radicals to avoid the science, rather than to rely on it.

Ordinarily when there is controversy, one side is more than eager to have the other see and deal with their data. Here, the fraud perps seek to hide their "data" and prevent anyone from even having the opportunity to be swayed by it.

This is why we know beyond the shadow of a doubt that a world-scale unprecedented crime against humanity is being perpetrated by leftwing operatives.

[hoosiermama]

Neal Cavuto just said on his program that he has MS...So does Janice Dean, the Weather Machine.

Don’t we have some information on D3 that might help both of them.....
How do we contact them?