Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infection Defense May Spur Alzheimer’s
NY Times ^ | March 8, 2010 | GINA KOLATA

Posted on 03/09/2010 3:06:00 PM PST by neverdem

For years, a prevailing theory has been that one of the chief villains in Alzheimer’s disease has no real function other than as a waste product that the brain never properly disposed of.

The material, a protein called beta amyloid, or A-beta, piles up into tough plaques that destroy signals between nerves. When that happens, people lose their memory, their personality changes and they stop recognizing friends and family.

But now researchers at Harvard suggest that the protein has a real and unexpected function — it may be part of the brain’s normal defenses against invading bacteria and other microbes.

Other Alzheimer’s researchers say the findings, reported in the current issue of the journal PLoS One, are intriguing, though it is not clear whether they will lead to new ways of preventing or treating the disease.

The new hypothesis got its start late one Friday evening in the summer of 2007 in a laboratory at Harvard Medical School. The lead researcher, Rudolph E. Tanzi, a neurology professor who is also director of the genetics and aging unit at Massachusetts General Hospital, said he had been looking at a list of genes that seemed to be associated with Alzheimer’s disease.

To his surprise, many looked just like genes associated with the so-called innate immune system, a set of proteins the body uses to fight infections. The system is particularly important in the brain, because antibodies cannot get through the blood-brain barrier, the membrane that protects the brain. When the brain is infected, it relies on the innate immune system to protect it...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: abeta; alzheimersdisease; betaamyloid; innateimmunesystem
The Alzheimer's Disease-Associated Amyloid β-Protein Is an Antimicrobial Peptide
1 posted on 03/09/2010 3:06:00 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe; null and void; ...

micro ping


2 posted on 03/09/2010 3:07:56 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Huh?


3 posted on 03/09/2010 3:10:09 PM PST by hkp123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bookmark.


4 posted on 03/09/2010 3:54:31 PM PST by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any pathogen recognized by the innate immune system might cause this reaction?


5 posted on 03/09/2010 4:18:46 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The article refers to the "innate" and "adaptive" immune system. The "innate" portion relies upon AMP and certain proteins to provide targeted protection against common microbial pathogens. The "innate" immune system is available in the brain. The "adaptive" part that reacts to antigenic exposure to produce antibody responses is largely excluded by the blood brain barrier. When the "innate" substances react with a microbial invader, the products remaining behind are the beta amyloid proteins. They are "normal" artifacts of the anti-microbial reaction. My interpretation is that a build up of amyloid plaques is an indication of a sustained attack on brain tissue by microbial pathogens that have successfully passed into the brain. Perhaps the way to ward off Alzheimer's would be to find a means of keeping the pathogens out.

From the article:

In summary, our finding that Aβ is an antimicrobial peptide is the first evidence that the species responsible for amyloidosis may have a normal function. This stands in stark contrast to current models, which assume β-amyloid deposition to be an accidental process resulting from the abnormal behavior of an incidental product of catabolism. Our data suggest increased Aβ generation, and resulting AD pathology, may be a mediated by a response of the innate immune system to a perceived infection. This model has important implications for current and future AD treatment strategies. First, it raises the possibility of preventing amyloidosis from initiating by pre-emptive targeting of pathogens/insults that stimulate the brain's innate immune system. Second, our model identifies the inflammatory pathways of the innate immune system as targets for modulating Aβ generation/accumulation. The target pathways implicated here are downstream of the inflammatory trigger. Thus, this approach would likely be useful independently of the involvement of infectious agents in AD pathology.

6 posted on 03/09/2010 4:33:29 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...

Ping...(Thanks, neverdem!)


7 posted on 03/09/2010 5:21:17 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Any pathogen recognized by the innate immune system might cause this reaction?

I have no idea, but this reaction is limited to the central nervous system. Maybe that's why the rest of the immune system can't clean up the beta amyloid garbage left behind?

8 posted on 03/09/2010 6:30:13 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The beta amyloid residue is only an issue when it accumulates as plaques in the brain. There isn't active blood flow across the blood/brain barrier. Apparently, no mechanism to carry away the residue. The same reaction carried out in non-CNS areas would have access to blood flow and assistance from the adaptive immune system to "clean up".
9 posted on 03/09/2010 7:35:33 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Thanks for the ping!


10 posted on 03/09/2010 8:35:26 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Researchers back cancer-fighting properties of papaya

Grandfathered drug for high potassium has no proven benefit (ion exchange resins)

High-fiber diet linked to lower lung disease risk

New HIV Hiding Spot Revealed

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

11 posted on 03/09/2010 9:28:00 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So it’s the flip side of a coin? Makes sense...


12 posted on 03/10/2010 2:42:12 AM PST by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Myrddin

Very interesting. Thanks for the ping; posts.


13 posted on 03/10/2010 7:57:16 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

(an afterthought on seeing the author’s name...I’m usually down in the carribean this time of year having one of those blood-brain drinks)...just sayin’


14 posted on 03/10/2010 8:00:46 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Thank you for the ping.


15 posted on 03/11/2010 9:54:11 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny ( garden/survival/cooking/storage- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2299939/posts?page=5555)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson