Skip to comments.
Homeowner Kills Armed Robber In Driveway Gunfight
WFTV-TV ^
| 3/16/2010
| Staff
Posted on 03/16/2010 8:43:02 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
WooHoo! Some feel good news after a day of more Democrat BS.
Shot at two bad guys, killed one and ran off the other one - at night in his driveway!
To: VeniVidiVici
Learn and practice “point and shoot” so YOU don’t have to worry about the one that got away!
2
posted on
03/16/2010 8:46:08 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
To: VeniVidiVici
Misleading headline. The OK Corral was a “gunfight” . This wasn’t;)
To: VeniVidiVici
4
posted on
03/16/2010 8:47:59 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: VeniVidiVici
Twouldn’t get no justice in the courts, anyway.
5
posted on
03/16/2010 8:48:21 PM PDT
by
Beowulf9
To: VeniVidiVici
From the article...Meanwhile, homeowner Dave Henry has not been charged in the shooting.
Are they trying to say that he should be????????
To: VeniVidiVici
I am tearing up....I just love a happy ending...;-)
7
posted on
03/16/2010 8:52:28 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: VeniVidiVici
“Ocoee police said they found the robber, 37-year-old David Butler, face down on top of his gun in the driveway. David Butler later died at the hospital. Police said Butler has an extensive violent criminal history, including an active warrant for a previous home invasion robbery out of Lake County.”
Good thing that he ran up against the wrong man this time.
8
posted on
03/16/2010 8:52:52 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: bigbob
One for two aint bad.Beats any Chicago sports team in a given season...
9
posted on
03/16/2010 8:55:55 PM PDT
by
IncPen
(HEY GORE -- GIVE BACK THE OSCAR! - GIVE BACK THE NOBEL! ANSWER THE HOAX!)
To: VeniVidiVici
I say well done. There is a huge argument in Topeka about open carry. I really hope that the idiots that are against it get their pie shoved in their face. To my knowledge no gunfights have broken out in the street because someone was packing.
As a side bar, if I saw someone with a gun holstered in public I would go stand by him or her! The odds would be in my favor!
To: proudtobeanamerican1
From the article...Meanwhile, homeowner Dave Henry has not been charged in the shooting. Are they trying to say that he should be???????? I think this is a standard line they teach in journalism school anymore :-) In Florida, the last time I remember anyone being charged in similar circumstances was about 10 years ago when an old guy shot at two teenagers in his house. I'll have to see if I can find that.
11
posted on
03/16/2010 9:03:48 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Alfred E. Neuman for President! Oh, wait a minute ...)
To: VeniVidiVici
12
posted on
03/16/2010 9:04:36 PM PDT
by
Palladin
(The Obama administration is a criminal enterprise.)
To: VeniVidiVici
Another Obama voter down, apparently. Bet this was not the change he was hoping for.
13
posted on
03/16/2010 9:08:27 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: proudtobeanamerican1
He’s still probably open for a civil lawsuit by the criminal’s family, or some liberal legal defense group.
14
posted on
03/16/2010 9:09:14 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Secret Agent Man
"...Another Obama voter down, apparently.
Bet this was not the change he was hoping for..."
Although it's change that I can believe in!
15
posted on
03/16/2010 9:15:28 PM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Secret Agent Man
Hes still probably open for a civil lawsuit by the criminals family, or some liberal legal defense group. Florida's latest changes to the Use of Force law (or Castle Doctrine) will not let this happen.
776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.
(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, . . .
Justifiable Use of Force
16
posted on
03/16/2010 9:42:10 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Alfred E. Neuman for President! Oh, wait a minute ...)
To: VeniVidiVici; Secret Agent Man
"Florida's latest changes to the Use of Force law (or Castle Doctrine) will not let this happen. " Yup.
The law in Alabama is the same. No civil suits.
17
posted on
03/16/2010 9:48:12 PM PDT
by
blam
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: ansel12
.....an active warrant....in every county in the land, hundreds of active warrants go unanswered, and the Sheriff Departments do very little about it, and municipal PDs even less. Many are for violent crimes. Many of the wanted are well known, even by the police. Frankly, often these people are "too violent" for the cops, who let them slide if they are currently inactive.
This is a national disgrace.
19
posted on
03/16/2010 10:03:10 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(Obama? Definitely eligible to be Prime Minister of the UK.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
Another happy ending bedtime story.
20
posted on
03/16/2010 10:22:55 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson