Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Deals In: Health Care Bill Gives Special Treatment (The bribes still coming in)
fox news ^ | 3/19/2010 | ap

Posted on 03/20/2010 6:01:53 AM PDT by tobyhill

Bye bye, Cornhusker Kickback. Hello, special treatment for Tennessee and North Dakota.

Democrats unveiling revisions Thursday to their health care overhaul bill decided to kill the extra $100 million in Medicaid funds for Nebraska that has become a symbol of backdoor deal making.

But the 153 pages of changes to the massive health care package include extra money for hospitals in Tennessee that serve large numbers of low-income patients. And though the bill would revamp the nation's student loan system to make the government the only lender, one bank — the state-owned Bank of North Dakota — would be allowed to continue making student loans.

That provision ended up rubbing Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., the wrong way. Fearing it would become a target by Republicans in what he said is "an overly heated partisan environment," he asked the House late Thursday to remove it from the legislation.

Still alive is special spending for Louisiana, Connecticut, Montana and other states that was included in the health care bill that the Senate approved in December. The House may give it final approval this weekend.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bribes; buyingvotes; fraud; healthcare; kentconrad; northdakota; obamacare; quidproquo; tennessee; votebuying; youpaidforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: tobyhill
I remember reading the very clear legal restrictions, with severe criminal penalties, for trading favors for votes.

Does anyone remember where that is laid out - and why aren't the republicans starting legal procedures?

41 posted on 03/20/2010 7:49:48 AM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

The GOP should just save it till election time then during a press conference or a debate ask the Rat opponent if they were aware of the law against taking bribes for votes? If they answer no then just respond with, “ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law”.


42 posted on 03/20/2010 7:53:22 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

This is only if the favor comes from a private party. If it is a government emolument, full steam ahead!


43 posted on 03/20/2010 7:55:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Hardly. That will trigger a number of lawsuits by States Attorneys General in a number of States challenging the mandates in the Senate bill.

Also, Landmark Legal will file its lawsuit challenging the House procedures on constitutional grounds.

It ain’t over by a long shot.


44 posted on 03/20/2010 8:06:42 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Sorry, but the law suits are a slim reed for hope that they will overturn this legislation. They should be filed, but the only way to undo this monster is through more legislation.

The fight will continue and get more contentious, which Obama hopes can energize his base before the mid terms. The Reps will be the obstrtuctionists and the party of No. The community agitator will be in full throat castigating his enemies and touting his success.

45 posted on 03/20/2010 8:11:56 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I disagree. The States’ suits RE: mandates, have a very good chance of succeeding. The Virginia AG will file in The Rocket Docket, which hopefully will live up to its reputation for speed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Virginia

I hope he will also be asking for an injunction to stop the law in its tracks while the suit travels to the USSC.


46 posted on 03/20/2010 8:21:57 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Hope springs eternal. Don’t bet the farm on it.


47 posted on 03/20/2010 8:23:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kabar

But you’re ready to give up if the Houses passes the bills tomorrow. Why would you give up while there are still moves on the table that could bring victory?


48 posted on 03/20/2010 8:34:18 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

bump for publicity


49 posted on 03/20/2010 8:47:13 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Don't be a fool. I never said I was giving up. The fight will just shift from Congress to the courts, to the polls, and to the streets. A revolution is starting.

This will be my last post for now since I am headed for the Capitol to participate in the Code Red demonstration at the Capitol. I was just at a demonstration yesterday at George Mason against Obama's appearance touting Obamacare. What are you doing to stop this thing?

50 posted on 03/20/2010 8:52:32 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kabar

You need to be corrected:

You said “the ball game is over”. That is giving up.

I’m the one who said it moves to the courts. Not you.

Thank you for representing many of us by attending those events. When the time comes that we’ve truly lost all or nearly all, I will be willing to travel 1,200 miles to help all efforts toward removing the current elected officials from office. It is not time today to remove myself from all possibility of earning money as an independent businessman in order to protest in person.

You might already know, but I began helping years ago by voting for the most conservative Senators and a Congressman who is fast becoming a very conservative MoC. There is nothing further to be gained by tying up the phones and computers of Coburn, Inhofe and Sullivan asking them to do what they are already doing. And no other reps in the nation will really pay any attention to my opinion, so there is no point in calling any others.

I am also active in a local Tea Party group, doing what I can.

If you have suggestions as to what more I can do, I’m open to hearing them.


51 posted on 03/20/2010 9:17:08 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson