Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guess who's exempt?
New York Post ^ | March 24, 2010 | New York Post

Posted on 03/24/2010 2:09:30 AM PDT by SmokingJoe

Good old Joe Biden, introducing Barack Obama at the health-care bill-signing lollapalooza in Washington yesterday, leaned over and whispered into the presidential ear (and a nearby open mike): "This is a big f---ing deal." Sure was -- though not personally to Veep Potty-Mouth, nor to the president. They're exempt, you see.

Really.

No worrying for them about the personal consequences of ObamaCare's overbearing regulation, worrisome coverage uncertainties and financial confusions. Same for members of the presidential Cabinet -- and all of their staff members.

They and their families are exempt from the calamitous health-care "reform" plan they've hung on the rest of the country.

(Think maybe they know something?)

It didn't have to be this way.

Last fall, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the Finance Committee, proposed that any health-care bill apply to all non-civil-service federal employees -- from Obama on down -- currently covered by the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

But when it came time to mark up a final version of the health-care bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid included language that applied only to members of Congress and their personal staffers.

That may well have exempted all congressional staff members employed by committees -- staffers heavily involved in actually writing the final bill.

And Reid never allowed Grassley's amendment to come to the floor for debate and a vote.

How typical.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1995; biden; caa; corruption; discrimination; exemptions; grassley; harryreid; healthcare; obamacare; obamatruthfile; privilege; privileges; reid

1 posted on 03/24/2010 2:09:30 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

2 posted on 03/24/2010 2:11:07 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Well aren’t they “special”? ;-)


3 posted on 03/24/2010 2:13:04 AM PDT by 1776 Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

THAT alone should make this abomination unconstitutional. Equal Protection Clause...but NOOOO!


4 posted on 03/24/2010 2:13:35 AM PDT by Shady (The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

If the Federal government mandates that we buy a certain product, in this case, health insurance, doesn’t seem like they would have to make all the possible approve options available to ALL of us? Or are some of us just “more” equal?


5 posted on 03/24/2010 2:17:19 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Utopia means no place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

People should go to the link and read the rest of the short article.

Leaders who will not expose themselves to the consequences of their policies are not leaders. They are tyrants.


6 posted on 03/24/2010 2:17:23 AM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
That image should be at every Republican congressman's campaign stops for this November's elections, in GREAT BIG BOLD LETTERS.
7 posted on 03/24/2010 2:18:50 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shady

agreed - publish it far and wide


8 posted on 03/24/2010 2:18:52 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Yep - as before - publish it far and wide

We have more hopes with the people than our politicians


9 posted on 03/24/2010 2:19:47 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

BumpandMark.


10 posted on 03/24/2010 2:21:44 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Amerika’s nomenklatura.


11 posted on 03/24/2010 2:37:44 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Laws for thee but not for me! BHO


12 posted on 03/24/2010 2:49:10 AM PDT by DaiHuy (One Big Assed Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Now, ain’t that Orwellian?

“All animals are equal. Some are more equal than others.”

Animal Farm was the exact forecast for our Dear Leader and his zombies.

Sorry, and I apologize George Orwell, I really didn’t think that your book applied to the free nation of the United States. I was wrong.

Big Brother lives right here at home with us now. (1984)


13 posted on 03/24/2010 2:52:17 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

So they’re saying that the current presidential staff is exempt? Are they mentioned by name? Or does it mean anyone who ever was or ever will be a presidential staff member.

I can’t for the life of me understand how anyone can be for this when they know congress and Islambama exempted themselves.


14 posted on 03/24/2010 2:59:59 AM PDT by Terry Mross (We need a second SONS OF LIBERTY but there won't be one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Yep.

Healthcare reform would have been brought to a screeching halt if they knew that they were actually going to experience Obamacare first hand.

15 posted on 03/24/2010 3:02:55 AM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
It's been said that ObamaCare is worse, much worse, than Canadian or British public health care. It really is beginning to look like the old Soviet Union, with one health care system for the nomenklatura and another for the kulaks.
16 posted on 03/24/2010 3:03:10 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

They didn’t read the thing! The “Yeas” just assumed that their special turf wouldn’t be disturbed by such a trivial matter as equality with the unwashed masses - and they were right!


17 posted on 03/24/2010 3:22:10 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

And there was a period for awhile when those Soviet leaders were dropping like flies. Might have been the elite health care system their state eventually produced. That is what will rule the day in the long run. Our current governing state is living within a corrupt fantasy world of their own creation that will continue every day to separate from physical reality. Those of us who retain our freedom will continue living within a reality being governed by truths we deem to be self evident. For the Tyrants, their Science is already failing them (Global Warming), their Economic Administration is producing record deficits and hardly anyone believes a word they state. They have lost trust, economic production and their science is failing them. In short, they have no future.


18 posted on 03/24/2010 3:31:44 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

If the Democrats keep this up they will be able to reinstitute some of their old favorite rules, like separate bathrooms, separate water fountains, and separate entrances to movie theaters and the like.


19 posted on 03/24/2010 3:33:41 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It all looks awfully like socialized health care in Europe, now. Two class-medicine, which those in power deny, of course. The major insurers are a de facto monopoly. Insurance rates are kept at an artificial high (in fact, they went up by around 60% in five years). The bosses in the 'social car' systems are known to drive ungodly pricey cars (i.e. a Maserati); and are know to invest 'socially' in enormous, and enormously vague, land and real estate projects. In brief: it's sh*t. And we all know sh*t to be NOT transparent (the latter being the main claim of the proponents of our system).
20 posted on 03/24/2010 3:33:58 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

These people need to be removed from office.


21 posted on 03/24/2010 3:50:27 AM PDT by muddler (Obama is either incompetent or malicious, and it makes little difference which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

That’s what Communists do...the ultimate Oligarchy.


22 posted on 03/24/2010 4:11:01 AM PDT by khnyny (Our government is becoming "The Committee of Public Safety")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Did you really think it would say anything else? Come on, don’t act outraged, we all knew they would be exempt.


23 posted on 03/24/2010 4:15:11 AM PDT by muggs (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
They're exempt, you see.

Shame John Murtha couldn't stick it out a little longer; he still might be with us. Just another victim of the 'old system', I guess...

24 posted on 03/24/2010 4:19:56 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muggs
don’t act outraged

Outraged? Yes.
Surprised? Nope.
There have been plenty of posts about this on FR over the past 8 months. However, it's going to be a very effective campaign weapon to be used to hammer the Demencrats in the campaign stops for the November elections.

25 posted on 03/24/2010 4:21:06 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Some animals are more equal then others.


26 posted on 03/24/2010 4:29:03 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Agreed! Spread the details.....


27 posted on 03/24/2010 4:48:03 AM PDT by magnoliastatefr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Ok, outraged was the wrong word. We should all be outraged.

As far as an effective campaign weapon, until the idiots that think this is a good bill actually lose the coverage they already have, they won't care.

28 posted on 03/24/2010 4:49:53 AM PDT by muggs (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Sadly THAT should have been our trallying cry along with the abortion debate!!!

YOU FIRST, CONGRESS!!!!

29 posted on 03/24/2010 5:21:35 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
those Soviet leaders were dropping like flies. Might have been the elite health care system their state eventually produced.

Might also have had something to do with the fact that they were a gerontocracy. Most of them were born into Orthodox faith when Russia was still using the Julian Calendar.

30 posted on 03/24/2010 5:28:17 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

That pic of Biden on Drudge today is disgusting. HOWEVER...
Kudos to Drudge for posting pics like this. It really speaks volumes in showing the arrogance and vile nature of this administration. The pics of Pelosi and her gavel will also be ones that will show up during the election cycle.


31 posted on 03/24/2010 5:46:06 AM PDT by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I suspect based on the mood of the country, these exempt people may end up needing emergency room care, STAT!


32 posted on 03/24/2010 8:05:24 AM PDT by crosshairs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic

But again, it says the “president’s staff”. If this means every presidential staff there’s ever been and is ever gonna’ be, all those who’ve worked for Bush can opt out. If it just means O’s staff, they would have had to list them by name.

Same for congress.

Or does it mean they’re exempt only when they’re in office.

I’m also convinced that if the republicans take over they won’t be puttin’ themselves back into the pile of the unwashed. I simply cannot to bring myself to trust the GOP to get us outta’ this mess though that’s our only choice at this time, short of all out rebellion.


33 posted on 03/24/2010 8:07:28 AM PDT by Terry Mross (We need a second SONS OF LIBERTY but there won't be one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: muggs

Sadly, the sheep who support Islamabama and his ilk and this bill, think it’s perfectly fine for congress to exempt themselves. These people are royalty to them and O is the king of kings!


34 posted on 03/24/2010 8:11:19 AM PDT by Terry Mross (We need a second SONS OF LIBERTY but there won't be one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson