Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court may weigh coverage mandate
the Washington Times ^ | March 29, 2010 | Kara Rowland

Posted on 03/29/2010 3:55:08 AM PDT by Kaslin

The same Supreme Court justices whom President Obama blasted during his State of the Union address this year may ultimately decide the fate of his crowning achievement as more than a dozen states have called on the courts to strike down the health insurance mandate of Democrats' health care overhaul - a move that would threaten the entire law.

Two major constitutional challenges have been levied against the new law, one by the state of Virginia, which enacted a law exempting its citizens from the federal health insurance mandate, and another by Florida and 12 other states. Legal scholars are divided on the merits of the cases, and even Congress - through its research service and its budget scorekeeper - has said it's an open question whether the provision could pass constitutional muster.

At issue is the scope of the federal government's power over states and individuals. Critics of the law say the requirement that all Americans buy insurance or pay a fine, if allowed, would mean that Congress has virtually boundless authority to compel actions. Proponents argue that legal precedents support an expansive reading of the legislative branch's license to regulate such activity.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Florida; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; cuccinelli; docket; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: Kaslin

bookmark


61 posted on 03/29/2010 10:36:57 AM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

I agree, after we win the House back and gain seats back in the Senate in the November election so they lose their super majority would probably be much better


62 posted on 03/29/2010 11:06:40 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: varon
"Not necessarily so. By the time it reaches the Supremes, there will probably be one or possibly two new justices, appointed by Obama. "

And the above is not necessarily so either.

The USSC could choose to use it's powers under Article III, Section 2 to declare Original Jurisdiction and decide these suits this summer...or even sooner.

Whether they will CHOOSE to use this power is something only they could know...

63 posted on 03/29/2010 1:02:52 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
They should have a few of these ready for when they're done with it. Then take it down to the basement to use for kindling next winter.


64 posted on 03/29/2010 8:21:36 PM PDT by 444Flyer (Obama's long war against America is in progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson