Skip to comments.
Supreme Court may weigh coverage mandate
the Washington Times ^
| March 29, 2010
| Kara Rowland
Posted on 03/29/2010 3:55:08 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 last
To: Kaslin
61
posted on
03/29/2010 10:36:57 AM PDT
by
PMAS
To: Dan Nunn
I agree, after we win the House back and gain seats back in the Senate in the November election so they lose their super majority would probably be much better
62
posted on
03/29/2010 11:06:40 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
To: varon
"Not necessarily so. By the time it reaches the Supremes, there will probably be one or possibly two new justices, appointed by Obama. "
And the above is not necessarily so either.
The USSC could choose to use it's powers under Article III, Section 2 to declare Original Jurisdiction and decide these suits this summer...or even sooner.
Whether they will CHOOSE to use this power is something only they could know...
63
posted on
03/29/2010 1:02:52 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: Kaslin
They should have a few of these ready for when they're done with it. Then take it down to the basement to use for kindling next winter.
64
posted on
03/29/2010 8:21:36 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
(Obama's long war against America is in progress.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson