Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nurse barred from wearing crucifix loses discrimination claim
cna ^ | April 7, 2010

Posted on 04/07/2010 9:38:17 AM PDT by NYer

Nurse Shirley Chaplin.

London, England, Apr 7, 2010 / 12:46 am (CNA).- A Christian nurse in Britain lost a discrimination claim on Tuesday after fighting a policy that barred her from wearing her crucifix to work.

Shirley Chaplin, 54, was told by the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Hospital last year that the crucifix she has worn for almost 40 years on the job without incident needed to be removed for “health and safety reasons.”

Chaplin refused to comply and consequently took the hospital to an Employment Tribunal which ruled on Tuesday that Chaplin is not facing discrimination, as it asserted that all employees are treated equally. Under the Trust's current uniform policy, however, one can wear a hijab for religious reasons but not a cross.

The NHS Trust argued that the crucifix and and chain could cause Chaplin or others harm if a patient caught hold of it, yet the nurse's offer to have a metal clasp inserted on her chain so it could easily be removed in such situations was rejected. The Trust suggested that the nurse wear cross earrings or “hide” the crucifix by pinning it on the inside of her uniform pocket.

Chaplin has worn the crucifix, a gift, since her confirmation in 1971. She intends to appeal Tribunal's ruling.

“I am disappointed, but not at all surprised by the decision of the Tribunal today,” she said in reaction on Tuesday. “It was obvious from the very start that the Trust would use every tactic possible to get itself off the hook. The Trust changed its defense several times and each time we were able to counter it with a sensible argument but this did not prevail. The Trust may have won the legal argument today, but its reputation has been damaged as the moral argument was won before I even entered the Tribunal.”

“I have had a huge amount of support from the British public, many of whom view the actions of the Exeter Trust with amazement,” Chaplin added. “It is extraordinary that the Trust can spend what must be tens of thousands of pounds defending their  position, when at the same time they are making cut backs which affect patients every day.”

“What the Trust doesn’t realize,” the nurse continued, “as it seeks to enforce its uniform policy in the way it has, is that it sends out a very clear message to Christians working in the Trust or considering working for the Trust in the future that they will have to ‘hide’ their faith. The message is clear: Christians whose faith motivates their vocation and care of patients do not appear to be welcome at the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust.”

“When employers or Government start to censor the conscience and convictions in this way it is a first step towards the demise of democracy,” she charged.

Andrea Williams, director of the Christian Legal Centre, which helped represent Chaplin, said on Tuesday that “The extent to which the Trust is prepared to stop Mrs. Chaplin manifesting her religious beliefs is remarkable. We hope that the Employment Appeal Tribunal will reverse today’s decision and allow Mrs Chaplin to wear her Cross visibly, in the same way that doctors and nurses of other religions can manifest their religious beliefs.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholicbashing; christian; crucifix; hospital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2010 9:38:18 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer

Today England, tomorrow the United States?


2 posted on 04/07/2010 9:38:52 AM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; markomalley; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; ...
“When employers or Government start to censor the conscience and convictions in this way it is a first step towards the demise of democracy,” she charged.

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


3 posted on 04/07/2010 9:38:54 AM PDT by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Hope she makes the libs show their lying.

Get a temp tatoo and put the crucifix on her chest.

Watch the “Obama dance”...e.g, change the sleaze to match the situation.


4 posted on 04/07/2010 9:41:21 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I guess a “666” charm would be acceptable... Oh boy.


5 posted on 04/07/2010 9:41:24 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
she has worn for almost 40 years on the job without incident

Interesting how they overlooked this fact when determining this was about "safety." That's because it isn't. Coming soon to the US. I'm glad my wife works at a Catholic hospital, they are not only allowed to wear crosses but also pray several times a day. Let's pray she wins her appeal.
6 posted on 04/07/2010 9:43:33 AM PDT by TSgt (It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

She should sew a cross onto her uniform and see what happens. The safety issue is a hard one to overcome, even if it is disingenuous. But so long as no one can wear chains of any type, then it is being equally administered.

A hijab probably doesn’t present such a safety issue, thus my idea to test the policy.


7 posted on 04/07/2010 9:44:20 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

A hijab is fine, but not a cross - this situation is totally f*cked. But totally.


8 posted on 04/07/2010 9:44:53 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why can’t she just put it inside her shirt or pin it to her bra?

It’s a crucifix, not a scapular. If someone told me to take off my crucifix in a hospital setting, I could see why. Working Psych, I’ve see workers strangled with chains around their necks.


9 posted on 04/07/2010 9:45:32 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sounds like the problem is not with the cross, but with a necklace. Do they allow other necklaces to be worn?


10 posted on 04/07/2010 9:46:25 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“I am disappointed, but not at all surprised by the decision...,” she said in reaction on Tuesday.
***

Me too.


11 posted on 04/07/2010 9:50:03 AM PDT by Canedawg (I'm not diggin' this tyranny thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
this situation is totally f*cked. But totally.

And that describes Britain.

12 posted on 04/07/2010 9:51:52 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

>>The Trust suggested that the nurse wear cross earrings <<

I think this is dumb, because it hurts a whole lot more to have an earring ripped out, but it seems they took your suggestion.


13 posted on 04/07/2010 9:52:16 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It’s a crucifix, not a scapular.

Hey ... now there's a though! She could pin the crucifix to her uniform and wear a scapular. They're made from fabric and can't hurt the patients ;-)

14 posted on 04/07/2010 10:02:17 AM PDT by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; neverdem

then they should also require male doctors and health care workers to not wear ties which can be used in the same way.

In addition, ties are reservoirs and vectors for bacteria which can spread disease from patient to patient.


15 posted on 04/07/2010 10:28:50 AM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Muslims read us like an open book. The left leading their gullible followers around by the nose.
The inexplicable in this is the confidence of the left that they, after the collapse of the west, will then be able to control the muslims.
16 posted on 04/07/2010 10:31:53 AM PDT by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I agree.


17 posted on 04/07/2010 11:35:30 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I like your idea and the idea of the other poster. Get a pin or embroider a crucifix right on the scrubs. Look at how lovely this is...


18 posted on 04/07/2010 11:40:53 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

That’s a beauty!


19 posted on 04/07/2010 12:05:49 PM PDT by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sounds like this hearing discriminated against this Christian woman

Their rationale makes no sense...since you can easily harm a Muslim woman by pulling on her hijab/burkha.

UK is just pandering to the Faith of Hate and The Cult of Insanity....while harming Christians in the process.


20 posted on 04/07/2010 12:45:22 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson