Posted on 04/13/2010 1:39:03 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
U.S. military officials tell NBC News that the U.S. Army will court martial a lieutenant colonel who refuses to deploy to Afghanistan because he considers orders from President Obama to be "illegal."
Army doctor Lt. Col. Terry Lakin believes Obama does not meet the constitutional requirements to be president and commander-in-chief
(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...
Sure, as you say: “If anybody could.”
I’m not a JAG officer, I just posted the UCMJ. I believe
fellow freepers can read and understand plain English.
Lunch breaks over, back on my head.
Work it out y’all!
the key to it all is what will be allowed in discovery
I have no clue about what his B/C says but the shouts are show us and then let us put this behind us, instead the far left and the white house would rather call names etc instead of dealing with the issue.
Having been in the military like so many conservatives unlike the loon left who hates them then there are many who still are asking the question.
just seems weird that a guy who got into power sealed those records right away.
My oldest asked me how bozo did at school and I could not give him a proper answer as bozo has sealed those records too.
Listening to him and seeing him then I have to think that he got mostly d’s and c’s and only got through and accepted through the racist non qualifying affirmative action
The NBC requirement of the COTUS is a FEDERAL not STATE issue. It requires a FEDERAL court to rule. Although, I will grant that a state ruling like this is not a good sign.
It shows how judiciary is leaning....at least in Indiana. What if a court in another state ruled differently? This is not beyond the realm of possibility. Anyway, it needs to be decided by the SCOTUS.
The U.S. Constitution’s remedy for stopping an ineligible candidate from assuming the presidency is by challenging the legitimacy of his electoral votes at the joint session of Congress that is held to count and certify the vote of the Electoral College. Objections had to be submitted in writing to Vice President Cheney (in his role as President of the Senate) by any one member of the House and any one Senator. However in January, 2009, no written objections were called for by Cheney nor were any received from any members of Congress.
The US Supreme Court has already rejected hearing any of seven different Obama eligibility lawsuits: Berg v Obama, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Herbert v Obama, et. al., Lightfoot v Bowen, Schneller v Cortes, and Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz. There is no Obama eligibility lawsuit on the US Supreme Court docket for 2010.
You did not post all the relevant parts. And there is ample proof that reading comprehension and being a ˜freeper’ are mutually exclusive.
I bet you recently stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. lol
They can’t present a photocopy of the alleged COLB. It’s not self-authenticating unless they have the hard copy of the actual document. And good luck getting a sworn and notarized statement for Chiyome Fukino that matches anything she’s said to the public.
“Obama is the biggest FRAUD of the 21st century!!’
Say it loud and often
An official computer-generated COLB doesn't have to be accompanied by a sworn and notarized statement. That's why the state seal and registrar's signature are put on them. Under Federal Rules of Evidence, such a document is self-authenticating. This doesn't mean it can't be challenged of course. I have doubts that Obama will let his alleged COLB anywhere near a real court of law. It won't pass the smell test.
There is always a first time. This might be the time.
Then they will have to allow him to remain in jail rather than ask Obama to produce a $12 document.
I predict he will be forced to retire or something of that nature, to avoid this.
Would you care to weigh in on this issue or are you just a back bench bomb thrower? I realize Lt Col Lakin WILL be court martialed for not following his IMMEDIATE superiors orders. I still count him as a hero and if you have a problem with that I could care less.
Well they did not do their job then. They did not check eligibility. And in fact nowhere in the law does or the Constitution does it say they are supposed to.
I've read the law, and of course the Constitution. Have you? The law deals with certifying the electoral vote count. It is not about vetting the president elect. It even prohibits not certifying the vote of any properly appointed elector from a state where only one set of returns is received.
In any case, I shall not revise my opinion.
They will certainly try to force him to retire. This is a bold move by the LtC, so I doubt he’s subject to being “forced” to retire. That said, there is no way Obama will let this go to trial. Despite what some posters have said, defendants in a court marshall do have substantial rights including discovery when presenting their defense. Would discovery work here? Probably not - Obama would simply refuse to comply - but there is a chance. That’s a chance Obama can’t take.
One point I haven’t seen made: Does anyone think this LtC hasn’t thought this through? Sought consel before hand? Talked to other officers? Seriously?
He could have been hatched on a distant planet or force-grown in a laboratory.
RICK LAZIO IS RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK HE NEEDS ALL THE HELP HE CAN GET, NEW YORKERS CANT SIT BACK AND ONCE AGAIN LET THE HIJACKERS,THE RAT PARTY, THE LIBERAL,SOCIALIST,COMMUNIST,PROGRESIVE LOW LIFE TAKE OVER NEW YORK. THE HOLLYWOOD WANT A BES NEED TO STAY HOME AND LET THE GOOD PEOPLE OF NEW YORK TAKE CONTROL OF THIS STATE.
IT'S TIME TO CLEAN UP NEW YORK GET THE DOMORATS OFF THE STREES OF NEW YORK AND OUT OF OUR HOMES AND POCKETS.
But one way or the other he was born, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.