To: Berlin_Freeper
Poor guy. Won’t proof of Nobama’s birth have to be provided in order to convict LtCol Lakin?
3 posted on
04/13/2010 1:40:50 PM PDT by
DallasDeb
(USAFA '06 Mom)
To: DallasDeb
That’s what I’m thinking. Discovery.
7 posted on
04/13/2010 1:41:29 PM PDT by
nolongerademocrat
("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
To: DallasDeb
9 posted on
04/13/2010 1:41:44 PM PDT by
silverleaf
(Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
To: DallasDeb
30 posted on
04/13/2010 2:00:49 PM PDT by
Touch Not the Cat
(Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
To: DallasDeb
no. and it shouldn’t have to be provided.
To: DallasDeb
Won’t proof of Nobama’s birth have to be provided in order to convict LtCol Lakin?Not a chance.
41 posted on
04/13/2010 2:08:25 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: DallasDeb
Poor guy? he is winning.
He has brought the matter to resolution in a court, a military court where the Commander in chief can be forced to prove credentials.
56 posted on
04/13/2010 2:34:49 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
To: DallasDeb
Love it. Can't wait to see the evidence, or more importantly the lack thereof, in this case.
185 posted on
04/14/2010 8:48:20 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
To: DallasDeb
Poor guy. Won’t proof of Nobama’s birth have to be provided in order to convict LtCol Lakin? I'm sure it will be assumed at the outset that Hussein is,in fact,Constitutionally qualified.And if the defendant tries to demand that a genuine birth certificate be presented the trial judge (who,ultimately,answers directly to Hussein) will probably rule that such a demand will not be allowed.
To: DallasDeb
Won’t proof of Nobama’s birth have to be provided in order to convict LtCol Lakin? In my experience, when the court martial decisions is made, investigators will dig into everything you've done for the past 20 years. Travel vouchers, fitness reports, medical records, taxes...they'll find something without every going to the original issue.
215 posted on
04/14/2010 9:14:16 AM PDT by
TankerKC
(I think P. T. Barnum had his time off by about 59 seconds.)
To: DallasDeb; nolongerademocrat; silverleaf; Touch Not the Cat; Cousin Eddie; Drew68; bert; ...
First of all, the Army only has to make the charge that the Lt Col refused a lawful order. It is up to the LT Col’s counsel to request the birth certificate.
Second, it is highly unusual for a judge to refuse documents that would exonerate an individual, especially if the documents in question are key to the defense of the accused. Defense simply requests the BC and the judge issues a court order to the state of Hawaii to release it.
383 posted on
04/14/2010 3:07:50 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
To: DallasDeb
“Won’t proof of Nobama’s birth have to be provided in order to convict LtCol Lakin?”
.
If the constitution were still in place....
.
446 posted on
04/14/2010 5:27:41 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson