Posted on 04/13/2010 4:56:17 PM PDT by howkn
But here's what I want you to know. Why is it America, America, Why are you people allowing Barack Hussein (the long-legged-mack-daddy) Obama, appoint people to the US Supreme Court, when he himself is in violation of the State Bar and has lost his license to practice law? And the Same thing with his wife, Michelle The Fist Bumper who lost her license to practice law. We have 2 ex lawyers living in the Whitehouse, husband and wife, both of them leaders of our nation.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Never before...NEVER has our country had a Disbarred Illinois hack attorney appoint Supreme Court Justices. Talk about hypocrite.
The man doesn't have the moral or ethical authority to appoint Supreme Court Justices. Think of how this peon ridiculed the USSC during his speech.
They should spit on him. They had enough integrity to answer their questions on their Bar applications with honesty. Not Oba, he full on lies from the get go and has the audacity to lecture those who choose to answer the questions honestly on their applications. Obaminc does NOT want this argument brought up under any way shape or form because they know it shreds Obo in such a bad way. It shreds him because he's a hypocrite and he is disbarred from making any decision on Justice's.
It’s like having a Dr who had their Medical License revoked, turning around and appointing the next Hospital Chief of Staff.
Or like having a serviceman who was dishonorably discharged from the Military appoint the next General.
Same with Obam. He has no business selecting the next Supreme Court Justices when he himself was disbarred from the legal field. He is not worthy of wiping their shoes. Even the Lib judges on the bench should be sticking it to Obam anyway they can. He was DISBARRED FROM ILLINOIS for LYING on HIS BAR APPLICATION.
He needs to resign.
Hope Manning spills ALL of Obam’s dirt during the trial.
You know it’s a hot topic when even the underground dem posters avoid the thread. They must have learned from one of the last Manning threads on FR which probably gave Atlah’s youtube hit count a boost to 21000 views. Normal Atlah youtube views are a little over 1000, although they are growing every day.
Rahm must has sent word out to stop engaging Manning threads on FR, as it only helps spread Manning’s message.
Obama first went inactive in Illinois in 2005, long before any primaries, way before the Clintons would have shown any interest in the junior Senator from Illinois. And he’s not disbarred, he’s inactive - meaning he can reactivate his status as a lawyer at any time. If you’re disbarred, no reactivation. Do you seriously think Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and the rest would not be making major noise every day about it if he were disbarred?
Again, many reasons to go against Obama. No need to make up stories and bend the truth like he does.
No, he is not inactive. He can no longer practice law. And if he lied on his BAR application, he is disbarred immediately. He obviously lied on his Bar application when he didn’t acknowledged his other aliases, aka: Barry Soetero.
He can’t practice Law again. Not that he ever did. But he will never hold another Law license as he lied on his application.
What responsibility does the ABA have re; fraud/no aliases on application when there are legal documents (soetoro divorce), as well as his memoir re: name change? As we know, the other documentation’s locked down.
Is there no need to report re: board/ABA even if the license was given up, or to inform former clients.
If Murphy can be busted for lying on his Bar Application, so can Obuma
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/12/8/131242/355
As bad as the failure to detect his disbarment was, he was on active service when it happened. He joined, as a JAG officer, while suspended. How did he slide through there? Did he lie on his applications? On his initial clearances? That he didn’t see fit to turn himself in, or to resolve the issue, makes matters even worse. I mean, he had to sign documents and such - as an attorney - over the last 20 years, yet he couldn’t be honest enough to deal with the issue that he was disbarred....
But, it turns out, he was disbarred precisely because he was dishonest:
Murphy, a graduate of the University of Texas School of Law, first ran into trouble in 1981, when he failed to file an appeal on time for a client convicted of burglary, according to court documents.
In August 1982, Texas sued Murphy, accusing him of professional misconduct. A year later, as a result of that suit, Texas suspended Murphy’s law license for seven years. But in a January 1983 application to be admitted to the Louisiana bar, he stated under oath that he had never been sued nor been the subject of a disciplinary action.
Both Texas and Louisiana permanently disbarred Murphy for lying on his Louisiana bar application; Texas did so in May 1984 and Louisiana in September 1985.
Murphy joined the Air Force after being suspended by Texas but before being disbarred by either state.
So, to keep the chronology straight:
1981: as a civilian lawyer, failed to file an appeal on time for a client convicted of burglary
August 1982: Texas sued him, accusing him of professional misconduct.
January 1983: Applies to the Louisiana bar and states under oath he had never been sued nor been the subject of a disciplinary action.
August 1983: Texas suspended Murphy’s law license for seven years.
November 1983: Joined the Air Force - had to go through applications and clearances (under oath).
May 1984: Texas permanently disbarred Murphy for lying on his Louisiana bar application
September 1985: Louisiana permanently disbarred Murphy for lying on his Louisiana bar application.
December 2001-January 2003: General counsel to the White House Military Office
August 2003-January 2005: General counsel to the White House Military Office
January-June 2005: Commandant of the Air Force Judge Advocate General School.
You aren’t a lawyer, are you? ‘Cause you know squat about procedures surrounding being disbarred. And yes, I’m a lawyer.
First: There is no such thing as being disbarred immediately. Disbarrment requires proceedings in order to effectuate disbarrment.
Second: According to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, he is not disbarred. A cursory online search in the Illionis attorney licensure files shows both of the Obama’s statuses. Michelle went inactive in 1993. Obama first went inactive in 2005. In 2008, he voluntarily “retired” and the documentation of such can be found here, at the Illinois ARDC:
https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=414726377
Third: Obama can practice law again as there have never been any disbarrment proceedings and there has been no adjudication proving that he lied on his application. Pursuant to the Illinois ARDC, when an attorney is retired, as Obama is, he can “unretire” or go back on active status by paying his back dues for each year he was on retirement status, and you may find documentation of such here:
https://www.iardc.org/registration/reg_faqs.html
Fourth: The canard you’re floating here has been floating around for quite a while. See here:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
So, in short, you’re wrong in every particular. I did a little search on you and see that you’ve been a Freeper for a grand total of 2 months and have posted some of the wildest conspiracy theories this site has seen in a while. I’m starting to wonder if you indeed are an Alinskyite here to make us all looks crazy.
So let me be among the first to say:
IBTZ
ABA is a voluntary organization just like the AMA. You don’t even have to join it...the state bar association, and in this case the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, has jurisdiction.
You know it.
He lied on his IL Bar application, at some point he will be disbarred and he can no longer practice law. Because he didn’t state his previous name of Barry Soetero, he lied. He is disbarred so to speak. If you lie on your application you in essence no the final outcome is being disbarred.
Who cares if you are a lawyer. Just acknowledge that Obama lied on his application and he will NEVER practice law again and will NEVER be in a position to pass judgement on who should be the next Supreme Court Justice. The one and only person he’s put on the court will probably eventually be removed as he’s illegitimate.
“If Murphy can be busted for lying on his Bar Application, so can Obuma”
Sure Obama can be. BUT HE HASN’T BEEN. And your whole inaccurate argument is that Obama’s already been busted for lying on his bar application. BUT THERE HAVE BEEN NO BAR ASSOCIATION PROCEEDINGS TO DISBAR HIM.
If Manning has evidence that he lied on his application, Obam should address it prior to acting like the hack he is and trying to appoint a Justice.
The guy is a joke and a laughing stock....trying to appoint a Justice when he himself LIED on his application. And then to lecture the Justices during his fail of a speech.
IL is a snake pit. Whose to say they didn’t disbar him and someone covered it up.
IL is a corrupt state on most levels. Nothing is believable from any gov’t agency in that state, let alone anything to do with the Lying Disbarred Lawyer named Obam.
Okay, so now your argument changes to “at some point he will be disbarred.” Which was not your first argument. So you were busted and now you change your argument.
And even were Obama a disbarred attorney, he could STILL be President of the US and could STILL legitimately appoint a SCOTUS justice, as many have stated upthread.
Like I said...IBTZ. You were earlier posting conspiracy theories along the lines of Obama being in the CIA in the 1980s and now this. It’s a little too conveniently “Rules for Radicals.”
Oh, and I don’t particularly care either that I’m a lawyer. It’s a crappy profession, to be honest. But I DO care that Conservatives get their facts straight and don’t run around making other Conservatives look like wingnuts who can’t piece together a factual argument that holds together when light is shined upon it.
Just posting Manning’s threads and speaking to his actual comments. Believe him that he will present evidence backing up what he’s stated. He states Obama is Disbarred. You disagree, either way if Obama LIED on his application he will eventually be disbarred if he already isn’t as Manning states.
You can’t lie on a Bar application and keep your license, even if one tries to stop it by inactivating it prior to disbarment.
Learn to scroll if you don’t like the Manning threads. Again, SCROLL.
Manning has a trial coming up on May 14 and there will continue to be multiple threads referencing updates about the upcoming Obama Trial where Manning states he has evidence that Obama committed fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud.
So again learn to scroll if you don’t like the topic. Manning states Obama is Disbarred. He claims to be providing proof for many things in his upcoming trial.
And Manning has a point, who is Obam to be appointing anyone to Supreme Court when he himself lied on his Bar application. He isn’t anyone and should step down for the good of the nation as he has lied.
Where is the proof of this? I don't doubt it, but I need proof to show my liberal friends.
A law degree is NOT a requirement to be on the SCOTUS.
Manning states that Obama is Disbarred. He may provide the proof in the upcoming trial.
A person who lied on a Bar application is in no position to be giving their opinion on who should be awarded the life time position as SC Justice.
It’s the height of hypocrisy. Obam lies on his Bar application on his background. No way can anyone expect the American people, who he works for, to think he has any legitimate ability to sit in judgement of selecting Supreme Court Justices.
It’s like the fired bank clerk turning around and thinking he has sound judgement for selecting who should be bank president....it doesn’t wash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.