Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO: Chris Matthews Praises Tea Partiers. Freeper gets him off guard.
YouTube ^ | 4-18-10 | JoinedAfterAttack

Posted on 04/18/2010 5:33:55 PM PDT by joinedafterattack

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Thanks joinedafterattack. He probably was worried that the still-at-large mouth-breathing thugs who attacked Republicans in Louisiana were illiterate and would think he was wearing a Palin button.


21 posted on 04/18/2010 6:18:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Matthews: “I’m not...uh....I’m impressed by their interest.”

Sure; it is impressive. Amazing what the 'reason-challenged' can do. OR. ..maybe Chris got caught with a tingle up/down(?) his leg as he watched this Tea Party.

Actually think they is a jealousy here. Doubtful these people whave ever experienced a 'patriotic'- or altruistic - feeling. When they see it/real, raw and uncensored; think they are impressed - and resentful.

For people who think they have it all and ' by 'special gifts of intellect', know it all'; could be a bit of a bitter pill.

22 posted on 04/18/2010 6:19:46 PM PDT by cricket (We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
From Wikipedia:

Matthews is married to Kathleen Matthews, who anchored News 7 on WJLA-TV, the ABC affiliate in Washington, D.C, before accepting a position as an executive vice president with J.W. Marriott. The couple has three children: Michael, Thomas and Caroline. His brother Jim Matthews, a Republican, is a County Commissioner in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

Also noted was his salary of $5 million a year. That, plus the wifey's salary...well, they sure are not poor liberal Democrats. Just as most of the Dems who tell us we should economize, pay more taxes, take care of the downtrodden through government programs, etc...they live a life of luxury most of us cannot even imagine. All while they claim that only the Republicans are rich and greedy people in this country. .

23 posted on 04/18/2010 6:19:57 PM PDT by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

[Insert “Leg-Tingling” Joke Here]


24 posted on 04/18/2010 6:20:00 PM PDT by sayfer bullets ("...and if it stops moving, subsidize it." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
Get a good look at Mathews wife when he answers the Tea Party question

I don't think that's Chris' wife, Kathleen. She's a sharp looking lady and a recently retired TV journalist at WJLA.

25 posted on 04/18/2010 6:31:47 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Great video but why did you ask the question about “catch shares”? Just curious because that would destroy my business.

vob


26 posted on 04/18/2010 6:32:26 PM PDT by Vob (free radical community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

He was looking pretty old in that video. And he’s still an a**hole.


27 posted on 04/18/2010 6:33:20 PM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

This is Kathleen Matthews. She was a pretty decent journalist in DC and never acted as idiotically as her husband. Another strange partnership in Washington like Carville and his wife.

28 posted on 04/18/2010 6:36:36 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I wonder what his wife thought of him lusting after Erin Burnett on air:

Leering Chris Matthews Asks Female CNBC Anchor to Move in Closer to Camera Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2007/08/12/leering-chris-matthews-asks-female-cnbc-anchor-move-closer-camera#ixzz0lVRaMWmA

29 posted on 04/18/2010 6:41:36 PM PDT by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cricket

Good points. I also think the libs are envious because it is THEY who fancy themselves to be in possession of the very soul of the protest movement in America, yet the best they could muster during the Bush years were a few dozen Code Pinkos here and there chanting tired “Bush lied, people died” slogans and holding equally tired signs.

The Tea Party protest movement is MASSIVE by comparison. ...and considerably more organized.


30 posted on 04/18/2010 6:42:28 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

He looks and acts like he is a hundred years old!


31 posted on 04/18/2010 6:45:45 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

His last name is correctly spelt:

Antiamericandirtbagschmuck.

Which is, undoubtedly, why he opted for ‘Matthews’.


32 posted on 04/18/2010 6:49:06 PM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama? A phony and a prick, ergo a dildo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The Tea Party protest movement is MASSIVE by comparison. ...and considerably more organized.

I have to disagree on the organized part. The Tea Parties are not part of any organized effort. It is very diffused and localized. It is definitely a spontaneous outpouring of anger than the anti-war protests. (BTW, the SF protest against Bush had around 160,000 people by my estimate but there were two aspects to it -- they included a massive number of gawkers and most of the people who marched belonged to some organization or the other, i.e., they were shepherded in there by their local organization.)

Organizing a protest (i.e., sending out a call to assemble and succeeding at it) is another term for astroturfing. Agree with you about the rest of the country. The numbers were few. Apart from SF, NYC had a large march one day, but that was a response to a call too and that was about it.

33 posted on 04/18/2010 7:12:16 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Chrissy has a wife?

Lisa Minnelli has had at least two homosexual husbands. Just saying...

34 posted on 04/18/2010 7:21:19 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Rachel Madow


35 posted on 04/18/2010 7:33:07 PM PDT by skimask
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
They probably both get tingles from the same Obama speeches.

I bet she sits there and flicks that ole "butter bean" and Chrissy "bats the bishop" while Obama gives a speech...LOL
36 posted on 04/18/2010 8:20:39 PM PDT by az.b1bbomberfxr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

His brother is as far Right as Chris is to the left...


37 posted on 04/18/2010 8:23:42 PM PDT by tubebender (Don 't pick a fight with an old man.  If he is too old to fight, he'll just shoot you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vob

I asked because I am against Catch Shares and wanted to get him to weigh in if I could frame it as Barney Frank is against them, which he is. Stay tuned. I have another CA Dem mayor on video coming out against catch shares on video. Will post monday.


38 posted on 04/18/2010 8:57:33 PM PDT by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Point taken. ...and agreed. Massive, very much so. But certainly not organized in the usual astroturfian sense. Clumsy of me to use that word. I meant unified. ...specifically, the protestors' unified advocacy of limited gov't and disgust at the extent of govt's intrusion into the private sector.
39 posted on 04/18/2010 9:39:09 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Call NOAA actions what they truly are: obstruction of justice
April 15, 2010 05:55 am

http://www.gloucestertimes.com/puopinion/local_story_104224038.html/resources_printstory

Dale J. Jones, police chief for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, appears to have been fired.
But based on what NOAA head Jane Lubchenco and various congressmen know about his actions in recent months, he deserves a much harsher punishment than simply losing his job.
The chairman of a U.S. House oversight subcommittee revealed this week that Jones had reportedly shredded 75 percent of the material in his files last November — during the final stages of an active national investigation into claims that his agents had been both vindictive and unfair in their enforcement of commercial fishing regulations in the New England region.
That information came in a letter from Congressman Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, chairman of the House Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, to Lois Schiffer, new general counsel for NOAA, and Barbara Fredericks, assistant general counsel for the Commerce Department.
And that action, if confirmed, would constitute obstruction of justice, according to Kucinich and Cape Ann’s Congressman John Tierney, D-Salem, who warned Jones of that in a previous letter to him demanding documents and answers about document shredding.
So far, however, there has been no visible public response from Lubchenco. It is not even official that Jones has been fired.
Justin Kenney, communications director for Lubchenco, confirmed to Times reporter Richard Gaines that Schiffer had received the letter from Kucinich, but would not comment further.
Eric Schwaab, chosen in February by Lubchenco to lead the National Marine Fisheries Service, issued a statement last Friday that said nothing about Jones — it did not even mention him — but said that Alan Risenhoover would be taking the post temporarily.
This continuing lack of transparency and accountability would be appalling under any circumstances. But with an entire new regulatory regime set to begin in less than three weeks, on May 1, it is even more appalling. The so-called “catch share” system is expected to drive even more fishermen out of business, in an already devastated industry.
The catch share system must be delayed for at least a year, while NOAA first gets its own house in order before wrecking the lives of even more fishermen.
But, in the immediate, if Lubchenco won’t do her job, it is time for Kucinich and Tierney, along with the state’s two senators, John Kerry and Scott Brown, to ramp up the pressure.
If it is confirmed that Jones shredded the majority of his files, he should be charged with the crime the congressmen said it is — federal obstruction of justice.
How Lubchenco could ignore that when fishermen have been hit with crippling fines for minor violations of regulations is beyond comprehension.
She said when she was appointed by President Obama to lead NOAA that she intended to repair the breach of trust between her agency and the fishing industry.
It should be obvious that her current lack of action is only making that breach of trust much, much worse.
Copyright © 1999-2010 cnhi, inc.


40 posted on 04/18/2010 9:43:51 PM PDT by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson