Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Washington Racks Up 220 Years of Late Fees At Library
Slashdot ^ | 4/19/10 | samzenpus

Posted on 04/20/2010 12:09:34 AM PDT by Clint Williams

Everyone knows that George Washington couldn't tell a lie. What you probably didn't know is that he couldn't return a library book on time. From the article: "New York City's oldest library says one of its ledgers shows that the president has racked up 220 years' worth of late fees on two books he borrowed, but never returned. One of the books was the 'Law of Nations,' which deals with international relations. The other was a volume of debates from Britain's House of Commons. Both books were due on Nov. 2, 1789."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: chat; georgewashington; library; naturalborncitizen

1 posted on 04/20/2010 12:09:34 AM PDT by Clint Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

The Far Left Looney Toons finally got something on George. He did not return 2 Libray books. He was probably busy at Valley Forge.


2 posted on 04/20/2010 12:12:17 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

I don’t look for him to be in to pay the fine any time soon.


3 posted on 04/20/2010 12:22:58 AM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

In the island of my birth, I’m sure an ambulance chaser will emerge from the woodworks and will be willing to sue President Washington’s heirs on behalf of the library on a contingency basis...


4 posted on 04/20/2010 12:36:28 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland ( schmuckie schucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

Something tells me that he ain’t pay these and he probably don’t really care either...


5 posted on 04/20/2010 12:37:56 AM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae; rxsid; Seizethecarp

Now I ask you, what other evidence is necessary to prove that the Founding Fathers were reading Vattel?


6 posted on 04/20/2010 1:30:57 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

He was 8 months into his first term as the first POTUS.


7 posted on 04/20/2010 1:39:30 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

MSM: Obama/Washington share commonalities.

Oh wait, Obama had unpaid, overdue parking tickets.

Never mind.


8 posted on 04/20/2010 1:43:46 AM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield (Joe Biden on the passage of the health care bill: "This is a big f**king")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
what other evidence is necessary to prove that the Founding Fathers were reading Vattel?

How about one of the founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin, saying so?

Charles W.F. Dumas, an ardent supporter of the American cause, printed an edition of {The Law of Nations} in 1774, with his own notes illustrating how the book applied to the American situation.
In 1770, Dumas had met Franklin in Holland, and was one of Franklin's key collaborators in his European diplomacy. He sent three copies to Franklin, instructing him to send one to Harvard University, and to put one in the Philadelphia library.
Franklin sent Dumas a letter, Dec. 9, 1775, thanking him for the gift. Franklin stated, ``I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations.
Accordingly, that copy which I kept, has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting ...|.''

9 posted on 04/20/2010 1:47:17 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Well, yeah, that works too. But this little tidbit made me smile.


10 posted on 04/20/2010 1:54:02 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

Actually, the headline should read, “liberal librarians drop the ball on collecting fines for the benefit of the library victims who could not read the books Washington forgot to return before he died...their claims have been barred by the Statute of Limitations, but they argue that statute is a living and breathing statute that should not apply to them because of the seriousness of the charge and the fact that they really care about the victims of George Washington”


11 posted on 04/20/2010 8:02:42 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams; All

library fines cannot exceed the original cost of the book


12 posted on 04/20/2010 11:12:14 AM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson