Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group: Army symbol is religious, should be changed
AP ^ | 4/29/2010 | Dan Elliott

Posted on 04/29/2010 12:48:46 PM PDT by markomalley

A religious watchdog group says a cross and motto on the emblem of an Army hospital in Colorado violate the constitutional requirement for separation of church and state and should be removed.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation asked the Army this week to change the emblem of Evans Army Community Hospital at Fort Carson, outside Colorado Springs.

The emblem says "Pro deo et humanitate" or "For God and humanity."

Fort Carson commanders will review the complaint, Lt. Col. Steve Wollman said.

He said the emblem had been approved by the Army Institute of Heraldry and has been in use since 1969.

Wollman said references to doctors serving God and humanity date to the time of Hippocrates, a pre-Christianity Greek physician.

Wollman said the cross, which has a pointed base, is both an emblem of mercy and a symbol dating to the Middle Ages, when pilgrims carried a cross with a spiked base to mark the site of a camp.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: antitheism; army; atheistsupremacists; carson; co; colorado; coloradosprings; cross; culture; culturewar; evansarmyhospital; fortcarson; ftcarson; godlesscommunism; iconography; icons; joewilson; liberalfascism; military; moralabsolutes; mrff; nigerflap; radicalsecularism; revisionisthistory; symbolism; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: avacado

To be fair to God, we really should stop pretending that He is welcome in these organization and places.

It’s only the sad truth.


21 posted on 04/29/2010 1:03:42 PM PDT by donna ("I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth." Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That Military Religious Freedom Foundation is the group that demanded, on behalf of muslims in the military, that Franklin Graham and the entire National Day of PRayer Task Force be removed from the event this year at the Pentagon. There’s a thread on FR about that. The founder of the MRFF is virulently anti-Christian.


22 posted on 04/29/2010 1:10:01 PM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm

There is no such thing as a constitutional requirement for separation of church and state.

There is freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion.

I believe the term “separation of church and state” was first used by Thomas Jefferson in the early 1800’s in a letter he answered to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut. This Baptist group had originally written Jefferson and asked him if they were free to practice their religion in the new American Republic.


23 posted on 04/29/2010 1:12:00 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm voting for Sarah Palin because she pisses off the right people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I have seen little bits of Beck’s Founding Fathers shows. Last night I caught a little of Keith Olbermann as he was making fun of Glen. Olbermann really is just a liar. I am willing to listen to other points of view but not when they lie. Chrissy Matthews is the same way - lies to suit him and they never have anyone on to present the other side. No wonder MSNBC is tanking.


24 posted on 04/29/2010 1:15:41 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
It's been a while, but the way I heard it was, the phrase "separation of church and state" was only mentioned in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson, and is nowhere to be found in the Constitution. I'm sure - based on the history of the Church in England - that the "separation" part was meant to keep the government out of religion. The ACLU and other america based commies have said it so many times, now everyone thinks it's in the Constitution.

Now, unless the Constitution has been amended lately, I don't see where the legality of all these anti-Christian lawsuits is coming from.

As I understand it, we have complete freedom of religion, with the government being forbidden to "establish" a religion. I fail to see how that patch, or the inclusion of "Saint" in front a hospital name establishes religion.

How about people named "St. John"...will they be sued and forced to change that to "Mohammed"?

This is strictly ridiculous; they think if they can "ban" all things Christian that we'll run over to "islam" for solace? Well, obamuzzie probably would like that, but it ain't gonna happen...Christians don't run airplanes into buildings, behead people of other religions, or shoot 30 people on an Army base.

>
obamuz

"What do you think his presidency is all about...it's more than just Socialism."
25 posted on 04/29/2010 1:16:29 PM PDT by FrankR (Standing up against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future will belong to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction
The motto of Fort Carson’s 10th Combat Support Hospital is “IN CRUCE VINCAM” which translates to “I Shall Conquer By The Cross”.

That is absolutely fascinating. I'm sure there's a martial aspect to it, but the faith aspect is that by Christ's sacrifice on the cross, we have received forgiveness of our sins and the promise of everlasting life - thus conquering sin and death.

26 posted on 04/29/2010 1:21:40 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Yes, and, hospitals might as well be renamed....Medical Pound....and, release might be achieved, after treatment, only if someone wants you back for performance of some particular job, duty. Oligarchical socialism can really get efficient.

In the very early seventies, the “personnel” sign was present in administrative offices all over the English speaking world...in just one year, “human resources”, that cultural Marxist term, was prevalent and remains ubiquitous. I see the term “Personnel” only in old black and white movies now.

The military probably will fold on this Christian symbol issue too. It would be encouraging if it contested the issue. But then, military chiefs, such as Adm. Mullen, have too many “worries” to even contemplate such issues.

On a larger scale of issue..knee jerk may be in and strategic planning out. Without strategic planning it is difficult to explain to the nation why we are where we are and what the objective is. We do not even have a “Domino” theory offered. Our leaders say only things like “Pulling out will lead to catastrophe!!” Aside from non-visible strategic planning, no post-conflict planning was even asked for in Iraq, and, in the cases of withdrawal from Iraq and Afganistan, withdrawals are always more problematic than entrances and require planning consistent with strategic objectives for successful accomplishment.

The health of the US military may be judged by this symbol issue as being unhealthily mis-guided, as the military is not defending its historical integrity.


27 posted on 04/29/2010 1:23:46 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan eet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"...constitutional requirement for separation of church and state..."


There is no separation of "church and state" in the Constitution. It does forbid the creation of a state religion (such as the Church of England).
28 posted on 04/29/2010 1:28:30 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Change it to a crescent, and the objections will disappear.
29 posted on 04/29/2010 1:30:56 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A religious watchdog group says a cross and motto on the emblem of an Army hospital in Colorado violate the constitutional requirement for separation of church and state and should be removed.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation asked the Army this week to change the emblem of Evans Army Community Hospital at Fort Carson, outside Colorado Springs.

The emblem says “Pro deo et humanitate” or “For God and humanity.”

Pound sand. There is not constitutional requirement for separation of church & state.


30 posted on 04/29/2010 1:30:59 PM PDT by Ro_Thunder ("Other than ending SLAVERY, FASCISM, NAZISM and COMMUNISM, war has never solved anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
How did we let this happen???

By having total apathy towards the machinations of government. Can you spell American Idol? NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB? Sony Playstation? etc., etc. and on and on ad nauseum...

31 posted on 04/29/2010 1:37:44 PM PDT by houeto (Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/Jungle-Bucket-1.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Just tell the idiots that it isn’t a cross. It’s a lower case letter T which stands for treatment.


32 posted on 04/29/2010 1:48:56 PM PDT by rfreedom4u ("A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
violate the constitutional requirement for separation of church and state

Isn't one. Case closed.

33 posted on 04/29/2010 1:51:40 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

The Danbury Baptists had written Thomas Jefferson to complain about the fact that they were required by the State of Connecticut to contribute (via their taxes) to the established church in Connecticut. This was before the 14th Amendment was passed, so while the Federal government could not establish a religion the States were still free to do so. Although they Baptists were reimbursed for the amount of the contribution if they asked, they thought it was wrong. Thomas Jefferson wrote back a letter sympathizing with them and in that context used the phrase “separation of Church and State”.


34 posted on 04/29/2010 1:51:49 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Yup, erase the history and identity of America and replace it with new age islamo marxist anti American ideals, slogans and symbolism.


35 posted on 04/29/2010 1:55:30 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RonF

Thank-you for clarifying.

But “separation of church and state”....those words....are not in the Constitution, correct?

The libs want “In God We Trust” removed from our coins, too.


36 posted on 04/29/2010 2:06:35 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm voting for Sarah Palin because she pisses off the right people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Correct. They are not.

The language of the First Amendment says that Congress will not pass any laws regarding the establishment of a religion. That means that the Federal government (and now the states) may not create an established religion. An established religion is one that is favored above others through financial and other support that is not available to other religions. For example, the Church of England is the established religion of Great Britain. It receives financial support from the State. The 26 most senior Bishops (including the Archbishops of Canterbury and York) sit in the House of Lords and vote on legislation as a right of their position in the Church. That is an established religion. We do not have an established religion in the U.S. Putting up a cross on public land to commemorate war dead or “In God We Trust” on our money isn’t creating an established religion either.


37 posted on 04/29/2010 2:29:15 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Mikey Weinstein can go take a flying leap!


38 posted on 04/29/2010 2:49:39 PM PDT by MS.BEHAVIN (Women who behave rarely make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What a sick jerk this mikey is!


39 posted on 04/29/2010 2:52:11 PM PDT by Katarina (God bless ElRushbo and Mark Levin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It still has that symbol.


40 posted on 04/29/2010 3:09:43 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("If you know how not to pray, take Joseph as your master, and you will not go astray." - St. Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson