Skip to comments.
Judge says no to Obama subpoena in Blago case
AP via Brietbart ^
| 04/30/10
| Staff
Posted on 04/30/2010 11:03:41 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
CHICAGO (AP) - A federal judge in Chicago has refused to issue a subpoena for President Barack Obama to testify at former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's political corruption trial.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; activistjudge; blago; chicagocorruption; coverup; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; federal; illinois; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; obama; obamascandals; obamasenateseat; payforplay; payola; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Shocking, really. The Chicago Way strikes again.
To: OldDeckHand
" A federal judge in Chicago" NSS.
2
posted on
04/30/2010 11:04:39 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
To: OldDeckHand
3
posted on
04/30/2010 11:05:15 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: OldDeckHand
Goodness, I sure didn’t see this coming /s
To: OldDeckHand
Communists America showing its power again. Nothing new for our future unless change, and that will be hard to do. Deck stacked.
To: OldDeckHand
Or maybe Axelrod?? Or is this just a big waste of time??
6
posted on
04/30/2010 11:06:11 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: OldDeckHand
Did anyone here at FR really believe that ^any^ judge would allow a sitting president to obe subpoena’d in a case like this?
7
posted on
04/30/2010 11:06:30 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(We were hoping for flying unicorns that crapped skittles. We got nationalized health care.)
To: OldDeckHand
You’ve got what, 2 contradictory statements from other witnesses that say otherwise what Obama has said. And this judge says there is not enough evidence to depose Obama in court??
We all know damn well now that the judiciary is protecting that ass in the White House.
8
posted on
04/30/2010 11:06:45 AM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: diplomatic_immunity
Your right. Like that was gonna happen. While your at it, ask for his BC.
9
posted on
04/30/2010 11:06:52 AM PDT
by
cameraeye
(A happy kufir!)
To: OldDeckHand
WHAT DOES BUSH HAVE TO HIDE??
EVERY MAN DESERVES TO BE DEFEND HIMSELF IN COURT. BUSH CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO HIDE. WHAT DOES BUSH KNOW? DID BUSH COVER UP SOME THING?
THERE MUST BE SOME THING BUSH KNOWS IF A DEMOCRAT (BLAGO) WANTS HIM TO TESTIFY.
EVERY MAN IS EQUAL IN USA AND BUSH SHOULD HAVE TO ANSWER A SUBPOENA LIKE ANYONE ELSE! BUSH MUST BE GUILTY OF SOME THING.
I mean Obama.
10
posted on
04/30/2010 11:07:24 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
To: OldDeckHand
So Obamah won’t have to testify; “Depends on your definition of Play to Play”
To: OldDeckHand
“A federal judge in Chicago has refused to issue a subpoena...”
Sky blue; grass green...film at eleven.
12
posted on
04/30/2010 11:08:28 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
("A vitiated state of morals, corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom." - P. Henry)
To: OldDeckHand
Blago deserves a fair trial and form what I saw Obama’s interference there makes him a key witness. Blago should go interlocutory now....
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Two words. Bill Clinton. He had to testify in the Paula Jones case after a 9-0 SC decision.
14
posted on
04/30/2010 11:10:21 AM PDT
by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: OldDeckHand
15
posted on
04/30/2010 11:11:16 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Now's the time to ante up against the Obama Fascist Junta ( member NRA))
To: OldDeckHand
some are more equal than others
get use to it, peasant
(grrrrr.... I really hate liberals)
16
posted on
04/30/2010 11:11:18 AM PDT
by
sten
To: Jim Robinson
17
posted on
04/30/2010 11:12:57 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: OldDeckHand
What a joke. There is no rule of law. This guy could go to jail and he is not being allowed to defend himself.
18
posted on
04/30/2010 11:13:09 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
(McCain=Obama's friend. McCain & Graham = La Raza's favorite Senators)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Considering the charge is political corruption; I should be more relieved if the DID... the same with sitting Congressmen.
Those people get away with FAR too much.
19
posted on
04/30/2010 11:14:46 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Jim Robinson
Or...should it have been....
20
posted on
04/30/2010 11:14:55 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
