Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration Plans to Seize 401(k) Retirement Accounts
The New American ^ | 5/6/2010 | Joe Wolverton II

Posted on 05/06/2010 4:55:29 AM PDT by IbJensen

One aspect of a new and improved federal regulatory scheme is the seizure of 401(k) retirement plans and the subsequent government-administered disbursement of the funds.

In Chapter 3 of the Annual Report on the Middle Class released in February by Vice President Biden and the White House Task Force on the Middle Class, the Obama administration calls for enhancing the “retirement options” for the middle class by imposing “new regulations to improve the transparency and adequacy of 401(k) retirement savings.”

The plan, as sketched in the 43-page document, calls for the creation of something called “Guaranteed Retirement Accounts” (GRAs). Biden slyly shifts the onus for the idea through weasel words typical of the federal government: “Some have suggested the creation of Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (GRAs), which would give workers a simple way to invest a portion of their retirement savings in an account that was free of inflation and market risk, and in some versions under discussion, would guarantee a specified real return above the rate of inflation.”

These accounts would be “free of inflation and market risk” because they would be under the direct and absolute control of the federal bureaucracy. There would be no risk because the funds would no longer be moored to the free market and subject to the fluctuations thereof. Rather, the retirement funds of every hard-working American dependent on a 401(k) for their retirement security would be nationalized and made subject to the whims and will of the executive branch.

The current administration is practiced in the erection of such straw men to deflect their own socialistic and absolutist intent. The record is clear, however, and since the day of his inauguration, Barack Obama and his congressional co-conspirators have consistently and unapologetically set out to systematically nationalize the economy of the United States: first the banks; then the insurance companies; then the auto industry; then healthcare; and now the piece de resistance, the private savings accounts of millions of middle-class Americans. This is an unlawful usurpation of power unprecedented in the annals of American political history.

Coinciding with the publication of the report described above, the Obama White House, together with the Departments of Labor and Treasury, issued a so-called “Request for Information” calling for a detailed analysis of the pros and cons of the “annuitization” of individual 401(k)s. The scheme was set forth in a set of “Proposed Rules” published on February 2, 2010 in the Federal Register.

The document reads in part, “While defined contribution plans have some strengths relative to defined benefit plans, participants in defined contribution plans bear the investment risk because there is no promise by the employer as to the adequacy of the account balance that will be available or the income stream that can be provided after retirement.” And furthermore, “The Agencies are considering whether it would be appropriate for them to take future steps for them to facilitate access to, and use of, lifetime income or other arrangements designed to provide designed to provide a stream of income after retirement.”

The upshot of that clunky prose is that the Obama administration believes that employers cannot be relied upon to adequately manage the 401(k) retirement accounts it provides for their employees, therefore the federal government will relieve them of that responsibility and take sole discretionary control of those funds, thus eliminating the risk of mismanagement. In other words, the Obama administration is planning to divert the “stream of income after retirement” and channel it right through Washington, D.C.

Under the section of the Proposed Rules marked “Background,” the document declares that it is the intent of the agencies considering these changes to further “their efforts to promote retirement security for American workers.” And, to “provide wages that support families, and rise with time and productivity.” Since January 2010, it seems that the only thing rising with time is the likelihood that the economic wealth and might of our once enviable Republic will be methodically eradicated through the exercise by the executive branch of unconstitutional authority over every financial aspect of our nation’s people.

While the time for commenting on these Proposed Rules has passed (May 3, 2010 was the deadline), there is yet time for concerned citizens to contact their elected representatives and voice their opposition to President Obama’s proposed seizure of their 401(k) retirement accounts.

In response to the White House’s pronouncements, many Republicans in the House of Representatives, including GOP leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), have joined together to defend against the federal assault on the financial freedom of the middle class. Boehner and a cadre of colleagues known as the “House GOP Savings Recovery Solutions Group” (an organization founded by Boehner to, “help Americans protect and rebuild their hard-earned savings as quickly as possible while making sure the federal government does not hinder the process”) have written a memo to the secretaries of Labor and Treasury, imploring them to “take no action” to nationalize the retirement security of millions of Americans, representing trillions of dollars. The text of the letter is reprinted below:

Dear Secretaries Solis and Geithner:

As members of the Republican Savings Solutions Group, we write today to express our strong opposition to any proposal to eliminate or federalize private-sector defined contribution pension plans, such as 401(k)s, or impose burdensome new requirements upon the businesses, large and small, who choose to offer these plans to their employees.

In the Annual Report of the White House Task Force on the Middle Class, Vice President Biden discussed at length the creation of so-called “Guaranteed Retirement Accounts, (GRAs)” which would provide for protection from “inflation and market risk” and potentially “guarantee a specified real return above the rate of inflation” — presumably at taxpayer expense. In the Report, the Vice President recommended “further study of these issues.”

The Vice President’s comments are troubling, insofar as they come on the heels of testimony before Congress from supporters of GRAs proposing to eliminate the favorable tax treatment currently afforded to 401(k) plans, and instead use those dollars to fund government-invested GRAs into which all employees would be required to contribute a portion of their salary — again, with a government subsidy. These advocates would, essentially, dismantle the present private-sector 401(k) system, replacing it instead with a government-run investment plan, the size and scope of which remain to be seen. This despite data showing that 90 percent of households have a favorable opinion of the existing 401(k)/IRA system.

In light of these facts, we write today to express our opposition in the strongest terms to any effort to “nationalize” the private 401(k) system, or any proposal that would dismantle or disfavor the private 401(k) system in favor of a government-run retirement security regime.

Similarly, and more recently, the Departments of Labor and Treasury have jointly issued a “Request for Information” regarding the “annuitization” of 401(k) plans through “Lifetime Income Options.” While we appreciate the Departments’ seeking guidance and information from all parties and stakeholders in advance of regulatory activity, we strongly urge that the Departments not proceed with any regulation in this area before they have carefully and thoroughly considered all of the information received.

More specifically, we urge that the Departments take no action to mandate that plan sponsors — often, small businesses — include a “lifetime income” or “annuitization” option if they choose to offer a 401(k) plan to their employees, or that beneficiaries take some or all of their retirement savings in such an option. Data shows that 70 percent of Americans oppose the concept of a mandated annuity or government payout of their 401(k) plan. On a more fundamental level, Congress should not be in the business of choosing “winners” and “losers” among retirement security stakeholders. Instead, we urge the Departments to make it easier for employers to include retirement income solutions in their savings plans and to help workers learn more about the value of their retirement savings as a source of retirement income. Finally, to the extent new mandates and bureaucratic red tape from Washington push small employers out of the business of offering these plans to their employees, we would submit such an effort weakens, rather than strengthens retirement security.

We appreciate your consideration of our views in these important matters and stand ready to work with you and the Administration to promote secure and adequate retirement savings for all Americans.

Sincerely,

House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH)
Rep. John Kline (R-MN) 
Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI) 
Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX) 
Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV) 
Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) 
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) 
Rep. Pat Tiberi (R-OH) 
Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) 
Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-MN) 
Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-KS) 
Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) 
Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA)

While the goal of Boehner’s group is noble and laudable, the tactics it uses to resist the administration’s attack on middle-class savings seems somehow to justify them, as well. If Congressman Boehner and his allies are genuinely committed to helping “Americans protect and rebuild their hard-earned savings,” then their interest, as well as that of our Republic and the citizens thereof, would be best served by a bold and relentless campaign to drive all branches of the national government to retreat to a place within the borders of their constitutional authority.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010; 2010election; 401k; bho44; bhofascism; bhosocialism; bhotyranny; bloodoftyrants; communism; communists; congress; corruption; cw2; cwii; cwiiping; democratcongress; democratcorruption; democrats; donttreadonme; elections; hopeychangey; impeachobama; legalizedtheft; lping; marxistsincharge; may; obamanomics; obamavoters; obozothemuzzie; pensions; regimeofevil; retirement; retirementaccounts; socialism; socialists; soros; spreadthewealth; stealthewealth; taxcheatparty; taxcheats; taxcheatsincharge; theft; theivesincharge; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
Remember they need to find some way to pay for all the bailouts and they can't stand to see some cash sitting around somewhere. The fact that that cash does not belong to them certainly will not stop them. They have already raided the Social "Security" funds paid via taxes by American workers.

If the folks on the government dole or on the government's payroll via jobs were smart enough to figure this out they would be very, very alarmed -- when all sources of revenue are exhaused (as in from us), where will they get their money?

From where I sit, it isn't looking very pretty for anyone living in America.

1 posted on 05/06/2010 4:55:30 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I’ll yank mine down (WITH a penalty) before I sit still for THAT!!


2 posted on 05/06/2010 4:57:03 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Communism is a dead letter". Ortega y Gasset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“seize” meaning “steal” in this case. time to get the tar and feathers...


3 posted on 05/06/2010 4:57:30 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

They would undoubtedly stiffen the penalty from they current 10%


4 posted on 05/06/2010 4:59:52 AM PDT by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

IRAs will be next.


5 posted on 05/06/2010 5:00:05 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

They better do it quick because I’m about to retire and start drawing on mine - ON MY OWN TERMS, not theirs.


6 posted on 05/06/2010 5:01:10 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (You don't have to be ignorant to be a Democrat...but if you are...so what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

What’s with the pleasent request to not take our money?

Time for angry assertions to your congresscritters!


7 posted on 05/06/2010 5:01:38 AM PDT by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
They floated this idea from some educrat professsor, at least a year ago, and everytime since then, when I mention this to sleeping Americans, they either look at me as if I just dropped in from Mars, or they laugh and state "that'll never happen!"

I don't know if even this will wake up the sleeping.

Sad.

Liberty was great while it lasted.

8 posted on 05/06/2010 5:03:10 AM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

SS was supposed to be a GRA.


9 posted on 05/06/2010 5:03:13 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

I think part of the plan is to frighten people into doing just that. They want as much money right now as they can possibly get.


10 posted on 05/06/2010 5:03:50 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“paging paramedics to my desk...paging paramedics to my desk - STAT”

another “my head just exploded PING”


11 posted on 05/06/2010 5:04:05 AM PDT by Mrs. B.S. Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
This could devastate the mutual fund industry
12 posted on 05/06/2010 5:05:32 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
...the retirement funds of every hard-working American dependent on a 401(k) for their retirement security would be nationalized and made subject to the whims and will of the executive branch.

IOW, TAKE THE MONEY FROM PEOPLE WHO EARNED IT, SCRIMPED AND SAVED FOR IT, DID WITHOUT FOR IT, DIDN'T WASTE IT, ACTED RESPONSIBLY AND DIDN'T PARTY EVERY NIGHT, AND GIVE IT TO PEOPLE WHO SAT ON THEIR ASS, SMOKED CRACK AND DID NOTHING TO BETTER THEMSELVES FOR 50 YEARS!.......................

13 posted on 05/06/2010 5:10:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

They’ll probably hit you with a RETROACTIVE PENALTY / TAX for daring to evade their greedy claws.....................


14 posted on 05/06/2010 5:12:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Russ
This could devastate the mutual fund industry

This could devastate the entire country, let alone any industry .............

15 posted on 05/06/2010 5:13:17 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

I’ll yank mine down (WITH a penalty) before I sit still for THAT!!

Husband and I have transferred to a Roth IRA. We paid the tax penalty and will never pay taxes on that again!


16 posted on 05/06/2010 5:13:18 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Appended to the law taking 401’s will be a death warrant


17 posted on 05/06/2010 5:13:46 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elk
Didn't Jackamo Jackson come up with this idea back in the 80’s when he ran for president?
18 posted on 05/06/2010 5:16:40 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Gee didn't these same greedy govt thieves slam GWB for even suggesting they study privatizing SS accounts into “GRA’s”?

Can't wait for the day working folks find out “their” 401K’s now belong to the benevolent govt, are invested in union pensions and healthcare accounts, and controlled withdrawals will be available to individuals based on “means testing” once obama figures out how much money you should be allowed to have

oh, and and automatically debited for obamacare premiums, which will also be based on means testing.... which “means” redistribution

19 posted on 05/06/2010 5:17:53 AM PDT by silverleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“Loss of Savings is Number #1 U.S. Economic Issue;
GOP Plan Would Help Rebuild Americans’ Savings”

http://gopleader.gov/savings/solutions.htm


20 posted on 05/06/2010 5:22:05 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson