Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet the Unemployable Man
Wall Street Journal ^ | May 6, 2010

Posted on 05/07/2010 5:17:56 PM PDT by NCjim

The betting is that the Labor Department's Friday snapshot of the job market will show that employers added workers in April, perhaps even that the unemployment rate fell.

That would be good news, but not good enough. It's hard to exaggerate how bad the job market is. Here's one arresting fact: One of every five men 25 to 54 isn't working.

Even more alarming, the jobs that many of these men, or those like them, once had in construction, factories and offices aren't coming back. "A good guess…is that when the economy recovers five years from now, one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working," Lawrence Summers, the president's economic adviser, said the other day.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: males
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2010 5:17:56 PM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NCjim
with the new 96 weeks of unemployment pay I intend on retiring at 63 and drawing unemployment for the last two years before my ss kicks in.
2 posted on 05/07/2010 5:20:51 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working," Lawrence Summers, the president's economic adviser, said the other day.

I hope those are the ones that voted for "hope and change"

3 posted on 05/07/2010 5:21:09 PM PDT by 2aberro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2aberro

They all aren’t.....I was axed and I did not vote for the clown in chief.


4 posted on 05/07/2010 5:22:05 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Thinking of using 911 for protection? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
One of every five men 25 to 54 isn't working.

What is the ratio of want to work/refuse to work males between 25 and 54 is?

5 posted on 05/07/2010 5:24:58 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
I've been unemployable my entire life. Tried working for someone else once. Yikes! Thank you high school economics teacher that pointed out, if you are working for someone else, that is exactly what you are doing. Much better to work for yourself if you can manage yourself.

I've pulled out the self-butt-kicker a few times. Better me giving myself a kick over a mistake than getting the boot from someone else.

6 posted on 05/07/2010 5:26:23 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Maybe he just wants men to go back to school and get a competitive edge....or not.


7 posted on 05/07/2010 5:28:10 PM PDT by MissyMack66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

For real? Good for you, man!


8 posted on 05/07/2010 5:28:50 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Paul Ryan/Greg Abbott in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

OK. 17% unemployment for prime working years is acceptable to Presidential advisors and administrative policies?

Good to know.


9 posted on 05/07/2010 5:31:49 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! You do not get unemployment pay if you voluntarily retire. (Or could it be that we have sunk this deep already?)


10 posted on 05/07/2010 5:33:49 PM PDT by 353FMG (Islam -- America's road to destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Anyone remember how bad the economy was under Bush when unemployment was 5.5%?

TV is totally backing Oama and if people watch or have cable and sat TV then people are a friend of the regime.


11 posted on 05/07/2010 5:34:36 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain/Graham = La Raza's Senators & Estefan-Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NCjim; cripplecreek; Tijeras_Slim
Meet the Unemployable Man

__________

****

12 posted on 05/07/2010 5:35:33 PM PDT by ICAB9USA (I cut off part of my middle finger .......... it almost rendered me mute. -- Rahm Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I’m not sure I believe this.

I was in college studying business when Carter was in. They were saying the same things, that we had to get used to double digit unemployment, the new norm, the new Laffer curve etc.

I’ve always looked back on that as socialism setting low expectations of the economy so people wouldn’t be angry and shocked when the bad situation rolled on years without end because of liberal policies and agendas.

Fortunately the people didn’t buy it and voted in Reagan.


13 posted on 05/07/2010 5:35:59 PM PDT by I still care (I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
ALL THE MORE REASON TO BOOT ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF THE UNITED STATES.
14 posted on 05/07/2010 5:40:52 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICAB9USA

ICAB,
is that you?


15 posted on 05/07/2010 5:41:39 PM PDT by PuzzledInTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: I still care

The country changed a lot since then.

Back during Carter Americans were hostages to muslims in Iran.

Today Americans are hostage to a muslim in America.

The fools in NY voted for a muslim 7 years after 9-11.


16 posted on 05/07/2010 5:47:24 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain/Graham = La Raza's Senators & Estefan-Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Your comment has NOTHING to do with the fact that MEN AREN’T BEING HIRED. Don’t think this isn’t by design either. There isn’t a single textbook out there that’ll tell you WHY that’s happening. You’ll need wisdom and common sense to figure that out and they can’t teach you that in school.


17 posted on 05/07/2010 5:53:43 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Fortunately the people didn’t buy it and voted in Reagan.

Yes, but during the Reagan Era, there were still many jobs for men who lacked higher or even high school educations. The housing industry was growing steadily and dominated by American carpenters. There were still a great deal of factories staffed by an uneducated, American workforce. There were jobs that a man with little education could still earn a decent living at.

Those jobs are gone and short of some radical economic changes, they aren't coming back. Does anyone think the factories whose assembly lines have long since been relocated to China are going to reopen?

Right now, the "unemployable" (not just unemployed) man is a high school dropout with a criminal record. He has a low IQ and probably reads at a 4th grade level, if that. There used to be jobs for these men. Today there are few of these jobs and these unemployable men have to compete with smarter guys who have stronger work ethics or they have to compete with immigrants who will work twice as hard for a fraction of the pay. It's going to be pretty grim for a huge demographic of young men and I just don't see it changing. In history, when there was a glut of young unemployed men, they were turned into soldiers and spent on the battlefield. Today, even the Army isn't hiring these guys. We're about to see legions of the terminally unemployed men and men who have never in their lives held jobs and it's going to be ugly. We're going to need to build more prisons.

18 posted on 05/07/2010 5:57:47 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

If I were some mealy-mouthed incumbent politician or smug political insider and I read that it was likely that an army of 10’s of millions of men in their prime were going to be unemployed for the next 5 years based largely on the crap done by government over the past several years, I would be scared shitless.


19 posted on 05/07/2010 6:00:05 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Yep, the demographics of this country are completely different today than they were in 1980.


20 posted on 05/07/2010 6:01:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson