Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The SOF Combat Assault Rifle (SCAR) Reaches Final Milestone
FNH USA ^ | May 4, 2010 | FNH USA Press Release

Posted on 05/10/2010 10:28:42 AM PDT by Perseverando

The SCAR is the first new assault rifle procured by the U.S. Military through a full and open competition since the M16 trials were held in the mid-1960s.

(McLean, VA) —FNH USA, LLC received notification from the USSOCOM Program Executive Office—SOF Warrior (PEO—SW) that the SCAR Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) was approved and signed on April 14, 2010, moving this FN Herstal (FN) program into the Milestone C phase. This decision authorizes the production and deployment of the Special Operations Forces (SOF) Combat Assault Rifle (SCAR) MK 16 and MK 17, as well as the Enhanced Grenade Launcher Module (EGLM) MK 13.

Following a worldwide solicitation to the military firearms industry, nine vendors submitted a dozen different designs for a new modular, multi-caliber weapons system. The FN SCAR submission was the only weapons system to pass all of the Go/No-Go criteria and was unanimously chosen in November 2004 by the selection board composed of senior operators from every SOF component. The SCAR is the first new assault rifle procured by the U.S. Military through a full and open competition since the M16 trials were held in the mid-1960s. Tests in reliability, accuracy, safety and ergonomics were administered from August 2005 to September 2008 and were conducted in a variety of environments including urban, maritime, jungle and winter/mountain operational test scenarios. The SCAR weapons system successfully endured more than two million rounds of ammunition during these trials, therein making it one of the most heavily tested weapons in the history of small arms.

“The SCAR is one of the most tested small arms in our military’s history and is currently being employed in the fight to defend freedom,” said United States Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Products of excellence, like the SCAR, represent the continuation of a long and proud tradition of defense manufacturing in South Carolina. I look forward to the continued use of this weapons system.”

The FN SCAR system consists of two highly adaptable modular rifle platforms and a grenade launcher. Type-designated as the MK 16 MOD 0 5.56mm Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle and the MK 17 MOD 0 7.62mm Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle, both weapons are available with three different barrel lengths optimized for conducting operations in close-quarters combat, standard infantry and longer-range precision fire roles. All SCAR barrels can be easily interchanged by the operator in just minutes to instantly meet the requirements of virtually any mission. The MK 13 MOD 0 40mm Enhanced Grenade Launcher Module (EGLM) quickly mounts under the barrel of either SCAR platform, providing additional capability to the individual warfighter’s firepower, and can be easily configured for use as a stand-alone weapon as well. Because of the SCAR system’s modular design, ergonomic commonality (100%) and parts commonality (greater than 80%), it represents a significant reduction in training costs and life-cycle support. The weapon system’s open architecture is designed to support future advancements in operational requirements including ammunition, aiming devices, sighting systems and other mission critical equipment.

“The SCAR weapons system is a major USSOCOM program whose success is a direct result of the effort, commitment and teamwork provided by FN and the U.S. Government. We are extremely pleased to have had the opportunity to work with such a strong team in achieving the Milestone C decision,” said Mark Cherpes, Vice President of Military Operations for FNH USA. “This milestone signifies that our products are operationally effective and suitable for mass fielding. We believe that the SCAR is the most flexible, reliable and cost-effective small arms weapons system ever offered to America’s servicemen and women, and that it will give them a significant operational advantage in both present and future conflicts.”

FN firearms manufactured in the United States are produced by FN Manufacturing in Columbia, SC. The Herstal Group is represented by FNH USA, FN Manufacturing and Browning within the United States and directly employs more than 1,000 individuals. U.S. operations are located in Virginia, South Carolina, Utah and Missouri. FNH USA is the sales and marketing arm of FN. Its corporate mission is to expand the company’s global leadership position in defense, law enforcement and commercial markets by delivering superior products and the finest in training and logistical support. For more information, or to view the entire line of FN products, visit www.fnhusa.com. FNH USA, LLC, P.O. Box 697, McLean, VA 22101 USA.


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; fnh; military; scar; socom; sof; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2010 10:28:42 AM PDT by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
This thread is useless without pictures.

/johnny

2 posted on 05/10/2010 10:29:55 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Definatly needs pics, and gun babes.


3 posted on 05/10/2010 10:32:10 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

4 posted on 05/10/2010 10:36:59 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: east1234

5 posted on 05/10/2010 10:38:00 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
SCAR-face


6 posted on 05/10/2010 10:38:18 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Re-post? There’s pics on this 2-year-old FR post...

www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2019245/posts

[cut&paste, I’m HTML -lazy today.]


7 posted on 05/10/2010 10:42:40 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (We were hoping for flying unicorns that crapped skittles. We got nationalized health care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2019245/posts

Hmmmm. Interesting. FR used to automatically make links live if there was no other HTML in the post...


8 posted on 05/10/2010 10:51:24 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 473 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
This article is unreadable. It's filled with so many abbreviations and encrypted acronyms that it's painful to read. Every other sentence is filled with them. This is what use to be known as gobbledygook. Very frustrating if you aren't familiar with the lexicon
9 posted on 05/10/2010 10:56:27 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

Not guilty!


10 posted on 05/10/2010 10:59:51 AM PDT by ryan71 (Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
This article is unreadable. It's filled with so many abbreviations and encrypted acronyms that it's painful to read. Every other sentence is filled with them. This is what use to be known as gobbledygook. Very frustrating if you aren't familiar with the lexicon

“Todays Army has exhibited leadership by enhancing the facilitation of synergystic, scalable core-competancy paradigm-shifts vis-a-vis the most granular service point of difference, empowering the ongoing assurance of the product architecture being functionally equivalent and parallel to the longitudinal business-practice shift postulated by the use of mission-critical management dialogue technology on a go-forward basis, in accordance with ISO-9001:2008 standards.”

11 posted on 05/10/2010 11:10:25 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Nice gun but it would be cheaper to just adopt a gas-piston upper on the standard M-16/M-4 rifles. What makes the SCAR so reliable is the use of a gas-piston as opposed to a gas-impingement system. Today’s M-4 rifle is greatly improved over the old M-16 A1 so the addition of the SCAR is really not needed.

What’s needed is a heavier and more effective bullet. The 6.5 seems to be the all-around winner from the current 5.56x45 AR and SCAR’s. Tests have proven it to be more effective at range as well as being a “fight-stopper” unlike the M855 and XM193 5.45x45 rounds. The new 77-grain MK-262 round is much more effective than previous 5.45x45 rounds but the DoD still hasn’t adopted it fully. At least the MK-262 has the ‘punch’ for stopping the fight in the bad guys; still a heavier and flatter bullet would be best.


12 posted on 05/10/2010 11:11:29 AM PDT by ATLDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATLDiver

The Mk17 is .308


13 posted on 05/10/2010 11:16:24 AM PDT by edhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edhawk

Thanks, I had read that and was thinking of the 5.45x45 versions the DoD was planning on ordering as well. Replacing the uppers on the current rifles with a .308, gas-piston system would still be cheaper. I’ve read where some of the SPEC-Ops guys issued the SCAR were having growing pains with it but that’s going to be true of any new system.

The 7.62 round in those SCAR’s will fix the shortcomings of the current 5.56 NATO but it comes at a cost of added weight and reduced rounds carried. Again, if the DoD is going to introduce a new rifle I’d like to see the 6.5 adopted with a phase out of the 5.56 NATO.


14 posted on 05/10/2010 11:24:07 AM PDT by ATLDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Very frustrating if you aren't familiar with the lexicon

It's all about the TLAs, baby!

15 posted on 05/10/2010 11:25:31 AM PDT by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: ATLDiver
Which 7.62 are you talking about? The 7.62 NATO. (7.62X51mm) round will not function in an M-16/M4 lower. The 7.62X39 Russian round will but it is far from the best choice. They do make Lower and upper AR type receivers that will take the NATO round and that would be by far the best way to go.
If you are going to convert existing M-16/M4’s then go to then 6.5 but stay away from the 7.62X39 Russian round.
17 posted on 05/10/2010 11:40:11 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Rangers lead the way...... Punks are not a problem.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ATLDiver
"What’s needed is a heavier and more effective bullet. "

As in 7.62 X 51 Nato? (See "[ FN SCAR HEAVY SPECS ]" below...) [click image for full size...]


18 posted on 05/10/2010 11:44:43 AM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
“Todays Army has exhibited leadership by enhancing the facilitation of synergystic, scalable core-competancy paradigm-shifts vis-a-vis the most granular service point of difference, empowering the ongoing assurance of the product architecture being functionally equivalent and parallel to the longitudinal business-practice shift postulated by the use of mission-critical management dialogue technology on a go-forward basis, in accordance with ISO-9001:2008 standards.”

Do you have the PowerPoint slide of that?

19 posted on 05/10/2010 11:46:05 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

You must have been overseas a long time.....


20 posted on 05/10/2010 11:46:07 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Rangers lead the way...... Punks are not a problem.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson