Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treasury Department Blasted for Sloppy Record-Keeping on Bailed-Out Banks
CNSNews.com ^ | May 11, 2010 | Daniel Wagner

Posted on 05/11/2010 3:24:10 AM PDT by Man50D

The Treasury Department is lax about keeping records of its negotiations with bailed-out banks, including undocumented conversations in which billions of taxpayer dollars are at stake, a new watchdog report says.

Treasury fails to keep meeting minutes or notes from phone calls with banks that received money from its $700 billion financial bailout, says the report from Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for the bailout fund.

Barofsky's audit focused on Treasury's negotiations to sell bank warrants -- securities that allow the holder to buy stock in the future at a fixed price. Treasury received the warrants from hundreds of banks as a deal-sweetener as it injected billions of dollars to stabilize the reeling banking sector.

The report blasts Treasury for failing to keep complete notes about the process by which it sells those warrants after banks have returned their bailout money.

"When a brief telephone call can mean the difference of tens of billions of dollars, it is a basic and essential element of transparency and accountability that the substance of that call be documented," Barofsky writes.

The warrants were designed during the financial crisis to give taxpayers an extra benefit if the bailouts were successful in calming the stock market and reviving the banks. When stock prices rise, the warrants become more valuable because holders can pocket the difference.

After banks pay back their bailout money, they negotiate with Treasury over how much they will pay to buy back their warrants. Banks prefer to buy the warrants because selling them to third parties would eventually dilute the value of existing shares.

During these negotiations, officials failed to keep detailed minutes of meetings during which they set target prices, Barofsky writes. Even more troubling, he writes, is Treasury's failure to document its contact with the banks.

"Even assuming that Treasury is making decisions in every case based on reasonable and fair rationales, in the absence of documentation Treasury leaves itself vulnerable to criticism that its decisions are unwise, arbitrary or unfair," he writes.

The report also says Treasury lacks clear rules about what information is shared with banks as they attempt to bid the lowest acceptable amount to buy back the warrants. Investigators found that different banks received widely varying amounts of information, the report says.

Barofsky says Treasury should begin collecting detailed notes on meetings and phone calls, and should develop guidelines about what banks will be told concerning Treasury's price estimates.

As of March 19, Treasury had collected $5.63 billion by selling the warrants, the report says.

Treasury will review its procedures surrounding warrant negotiations and will detail its response within 30 days, according to a statement from Herb Allison, Treasury's assistant secretary for financial stability.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/11/2010 3:24:10 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

What? You expected records? That would require an entire new department...which you’d have to fund.


2 posted on 05/11/2010 3:28:26 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D


3 posted on 05/11/2010 3:34:08 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

More government incompetence or just corporatism?


4 posted on 05/11/2010 3:34:13 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Treasury Department Blasted for Sloppy Record-Keeping on Bailed-Out Banks

WHAT!!??? The federal government did "sloppy record-keeping"?? I'm shocked, I tell ya, SHOCKED!!!



(More likely they followed the Clinton model and (to paraphrase Bill) kept all the records they intended to keep.)

5 posted on 05/11/2010 3:39:34 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

The Mafia don’t need no stinkin’ notes.


6 posted on 05/11/2010 3:42:31 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Obie Wan Nairobi from the 1/2 dark side. The farce with this one strong, it is...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

A billion here and a billion there...pretty soon you are talking about real money.


7 posted on 05/11/2010 3:45:09 AM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
From what I saw, the terms for the sale of the warrants were drawn up clearly and correctly — in fact, all of the agreements were posted on the Treasury website for quite a while, and may still be there. I read through a number of them since I was curious about the details, which the financial press did a poor job of reporting.

This particular article is about the repurchase of the warrants by the banks that want them. I don't think that the article makes a strong case about there being problematic aspects to these repurchase negotiations.

8 posted on 05/11/2010 3:54:43 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Bureaucrats are sloppy all the time....on purpose. Makes it harder to exercise oversight. Plus many Federal employees are brain dead lard ass drones, lots of useless (and can’t be fired) affirmative action hires. They ain’t too bright or dedicated to their job

Some Fed employees are good but we have to many of the above


9 posted on 05/11/2010 4:00:08 AM PDT by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Check barney franks checking account.

LLS


10 posted on 05/11/2010 4:26:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Don’t you get it? - Keeping shaby records of banking transactions is the whole point of the American banking system. Remember Jekyl Island.


11 posted on 05/11/2010 4:28:47 AM PDT by TPOOH (I wish I could have been Jerry Reed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Intentional & Completely Unexpected??


12 posted on 05/11/2010 5:03:00 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

..Well at least they weren’t watching porn .../s

Honestly...why should We the People continue to fund this ^&ap


13 posted on 05/11/2010 5:04:11 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“Even assuming that Treasury is making decisions in every case based on reasonable and fair rationales, in the absence of documentation Treasury leaves itself vulnerable to criticism that its decisions are unwise, arbitrary or unfair,” he writes.

He forgot treasonous


14 posted on 05/11/2010 5:16:08 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

The only vision that comes to mind is from SNL: The Church Lady....”How Convenient”


15 posted on 05/11/2010 5:43:38 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (I ROCK, Guitar Hero said so........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Keeping records was never the intent. It is about extortion. “Hey bank president, nice bank you got there. Hate to see something bad happen to it.” Besides if they kept good records, there would be a paper trail in case responsible people get back in charge and decide to investigate this. Cloud the landscape and no one can be held responsible, but they got the result they wanted.


16 posted on 05/11/2010 5:48:22 AM PDT by Texas resident (Outlaw fisherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson