Posted on 05/11/2010 8:11:43 AM PDT by raybbr
Hot Air explains how Solicitor General Elena Kagan muffed her argument in front of the Supreme Court on the Citizens United v. FEC case: In fact, the crux of the case was the issue of limiting expenditures as an expression of political speech, not contributions. Kagan started off her argument by misconstruing the issue and then offering a factually incorrect reading of precedent. Both Scalia and Kennedy objected to it before Kagan even had time to get the argument completed, although as the transcript notes, she didnt pay much attention to them.
Transcript below:
ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELENA KAGAN
ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLEE GENERAL KAGAN: Mr. Chief Justice and may it please the Court:
I have three very quick points to make about the government position. The first is that this issue has a long history. For over 100 years Congress has made a judgment that corporations must be subject to special rules when they participate in elections and this Court has never questioned that judgment.
Number two -
JUSTICE SCALIA: Wait, wait, wait, wait. We never questioned it, but we never approved it, either. And we gave some really weird interpretations to the Taft-Hartley Act in order to avoid confronting the question.
GENERAL KAGAN: I will repeat what I said, Justice Scalia: For 100 years this Court, faced with many opportunities to do so, left standing the legislation that is at issue in this case first the contribution limits, then the expenditure limits that came in by way of Taft-Hartley and then of course in Austin specifically approved those limits.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Is this payback for losing in the courts?
I haven’t gotten it lately, either.
Obama so far is batting a thousand. Neither candidate is qualified to be near the Supreme Court; just as he isn’t.
This what you get when you elect bottom of the barrel scum buckets.
And Orrin Hatch will welcome “her” with open arms, gush over her brilliance and, of course, vote to confirm.
Whatever she may or may not have botched, there is definitely something fishy going on here.
John Kyl, my illustrious senator apparently already has practically.
She is a bossy, her way or the highway, horse’s ass.
Oh yes she can be worse, and she’s MUCH younger so we can have her for about 40 years if she’s lucky.
Seriously, that was not coincidence.
what we have here is a light weight heavy weight.
NOT EVEN REMOTELY QUALIFIED!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe the only saving grace is that she apparently eats a lot. Maybe diabetes will slow her down.
Her an the “wise lantio” woman. What a pair! Who next? Bill Aires? PUPPETS!!
Undoubtedly, Senator Graham and Kagan have seen each other at the same gay night clubs.
Mom Gloria taught public school's best and brightest at Hunter College Elementary School;
dad Robert Kagan Sr
*** Tenant lawyer with the real estate law firm of Kagan & Lubic
*** Robert Kagan Sr obit
brother, Marc Kagan is a teacher at the Bronx High School of Science
World History - Sophomores / Seniors
Marc Kagan was a transit worker and union reformer in Transport Workers Local 100. Marc Kagan was one of former Local 100 leader Roger Toussaint's top aides until the two had a falling out in 2003. That's par for the course for the Upper Left Side, where if you can't launch two feuds before lunch, the day's a waste.
Marc Kagan became a teacher and he's no less a fierce supporter of union rights in his new union. In a letter in last week's Chief-Leader, he takes a swipe at schools chancellor Joel Klein's notion that seniority rules shouldn't apply to upcoming teacher layoffs. He goes on to offer a full-throated defense of unionism...
Gomer Pyle a gay too? Amazing. Maybe that is what is wrong with him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.