Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kagan Botches Oral Argument In Supreme Court Appearance At Citizens United Lawsuit
RealClearPolitics ^ | 5-10-2010 | Hot Air

Posted on 05/11/2010 8:11:43 AM PDT by raybbr

Hot Air explains how Solicitor General Elena Kagan muffed her argument in front of the Supreme Court on the Citizens United v. FEC case: In fact, the crux of the case was the issue of limiting expenditures as an expression of political speech, not contributions. Kagan started off her argument by misconstruing the issue and then offering a factually incorrect reading of precedent. Both Scalia and Kennedy objected to it before Kagan even had time to get the argument completed, although as the transcript notes, she didn’t pay much attention to them.

Transcript below:

ORAL ARGUMENT OF ELENA KAGAN

ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLEE GENERAL KAGAN: Mr. Chief Justice and may it please the Court:

I have three very quick points to make about the government position. The first is that this issue has a long history. For over 100 years Congress has made a judgment that corporations must be subject to special rules when they participate in elections and this Court has never questioned that judgment.


Number two -

JUSTICE SCALIA: Wait, wait, wait, wait. We never questioned it, but we never approved it, either. And we gave some really weird interpretations to the Taft-Hartley Act in order to avoid confronting the question.

GENERAL KAGAN: I will repeat what I said, Justice Scalia: For 100 years this Court, faced with many opportunities to do so, left standing the legislation that is at issue in this case — first the contribution limits, then the expenditure limits that came in by way of Taft-Hartley — and then of course in Austin specifically approved those limits.


(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blunders; citizensunited; kagan; kagantruthfile; lawsuit; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: raybbr

Is this payback for losing in the courts?


41 posted on 05/11/2010 8:55:50 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

I haven’t gotten it lately, either.


42 posted on 05/11/2010 8:56:00 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

43 posted on 05/11/2010 8:56:16 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice
44 posted on 05/11/2010 8:57:01 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Obama so far is batting a thousand. Neither candidate is qualified to be near the Supreme Court; just as he isn’t.

This what you get when you elect bottom of the barrel scum buckets.


45 posted on 05/11/2010 8:58:36 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

And Orrin Hatch will welcome “her” with open arms, gush over her brilliance and, of course, vote to confirm.


46 posted on 05/11/2010 8:58:41 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
The Hot Air piece is very interesting. The sitting Justices, right and left, with the exception of the “wise Latina” won't forget that she was unprepared for the Citizens United, nor that she did not understand the basic principles of the case. I was at the Supreme Court during the last session and it seemed to me that the other Justices really gave the “wise Latina” the cold shoulder. She seemed to be talking only to hear herself talk and it was not pertinent to the issues at hand. The danger will be that the “wise Latina” and Kagan will form a coalition of ill-informed, ill-prepared, ideologues that have no use for the Constitution and no ability to understand basic American concepts and no ability to think beyond the moment without a regard for the consequences of the future.
47 posted on 05/11/2010 9:00:16 AM PDT by madinmadtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Whatever she may or may not have botched, there is definitely something fishy going on here.


48 posted on 05/11/2010 9:07:11 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary
Here you go..


49 posted on 05/11/2010 9:07:41 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Pro Aris et Focis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

John Kyl, my illustrious senator apparently already has practically.


50 posted on 05/11/2010 9:09:06 AM PDT by refreshed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

She is a bossy, her way or the highway, horse’s ass.


51 posted on 05/11/2010 9:09:33 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Oh yes she can be worse, and she’s MUCH younger so we can have her for about 40 years if she’s lucky.


52 posted on 05/11/2010 9:11:32 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Seriously, that was not coincidence.


53 posted on 05/11/2010 9:13:21 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

what we have here is a light weight heavy weight.


54 posted on 05/11/2010 9:16:43 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

NOT EVEN REMOTELY QUALIFIED!!!!!!!!!!


55 posted on 05/11/2010 9:23:45 AM PDT by Danae (Don't like the Constitution, try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Maybe the only saving grace is that she apparently eats a lot. Maybe diabetes will slow her down.


56 posted on 05/11/2010 9:37:36 AM PDT by hal ogen ($10 (I think) amounts through the internet from all over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Her an the “wise lantio” woman. What a pair! Who next? Bill Aires? PUPPETS!!


57 posted on 05/11/2010 9:52:58 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer (Don't tread on us...or you'll pay the price in the next election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Undoubtedly, Senator Graham and Kagan have seen each other at the same gay night clubs.


58 posted on 05/11/2010 10:14:11 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Family Background

Mom Gloria taught public school's best and brightest at Hunter College Elementary School;

dad Robert Kagan Sr

*** Tenant lawyer with the real estate law firm of Kagan & Lubic
*** Robert Kagan Sr obit

brother, Irving Kagan is an Hunter College High School alumnus and veteran teacher in the Social Studies department.

brother, Marc Kagan is a teacher at the Bronx High School of Science
World History - Sophomores / Seniors

SOURCE

Marc Kagan was a transit worker and union reformer in Transport Workers Local 100. Marc Kagan was one of former Local 100 leader Roger Toussaint's top aides until the two had a falling out in 2003. That's par for the course for the Upper Left Side, where if you can't launch two feuds before lunch, the day's a waste.

Marc Kagan became a teacher and he's no less a fierce supporter of union rights in his new union. In a letter in last week's Chief-Leader, he takes a swipe at schools chancellor Joel Klein's notion that seniority rules shouldn't apply to upcoming teacher layoffs. He goes on to offer a full-throated defense of unionism...

SOURCE

59 posted on 05/11/2010 10:50:54 AM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Gomer Pyle a gay too? Amazing. Maybe that is what is wrong with him.


60 posted on 05/11/2010 12:09:57 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson