Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Todd: Obama Offering Sestak Job No Different Than Cheney Offering Campaign Backing To Pawlenty
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 05/25/2010 6:35:41 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

UPDATE: See video clip after the break of an earlier interview in which Scarborough unequivocally puts it to Sestak that he had been offered the Secretary of the Navy position, and Sestak seems to confirm it. so much so that after playing the clip, today's guest Jeffrey Sachs, an ardent Obama fan, has to laughingly admit that, yes, Sestak had been offered the Navy job.

----------------

Does Chuck Todd understand the difference between offering, in return for a candidate's agreement to drop out of a race, a big federal job with its salary and perks, versus offering to support someone's possible future political campaign? Apparently not. For the NBC Political Director and chief White House correspondent this morning equated the Obama admin's apparent offer of a top job to Joe Sestak with Dick Cheney's reported offer to support Tim Pawlenty in a subsequent gubernatorial run if he would get out of a Senate primary against Norm Coleman. H/t reader Ray R.

View video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bribes; canttrustnbc; chucktodd; fchuck; immoralnbc; joescarborough; joesestak; nbc4bribery; nbc4coverups; nbc4criminality; nbc4criminals; nbc4dnc; nbc4obama

1 posted on 05/25/2010 6:35:41 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Chuck Todd defends White House offer to Sestak. Ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 05/25/2010 6:36:39 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Bump


3 posted on 05/25/2010 6:37:31 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Even Hitler had Government run health care, but at least he got the Olympics for Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Todd is in the tank for the Obama White House. He’s one of the few guys with access to just about everyone there because they know he’s their friend. He’s not about to say anything that might endanger that access.


4 posted on 05/25/2010 6:38:54 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Even after being dismissed like a cheap street-walking whore, 'they' still keep turning tricks for their beloved Mac-Daddy, seaking his love and attention which is never forth-coming.

..but 'they' keep turning their tricks in vain.

5 posted on 05/25/2010 6:46:03 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I see 0dumbo is using another ploy favored by alinsky.
Discredit and deny

Axelrod said on CNN that there was no job offer by anyone at 0dumbo’sWH

Their word against his.

game on


6 posted on 05/25/2010 6:46:34 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

I guess that depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is!


7 posted on 05/25/2010 6:50:10 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger
Axelrod said on CNN that there was no job offer by anyone at 0dumbo’s WH Their word against his. Game on.

Amen to that, and given the fact 0bama is now tanking in the polls, his ability to shake this off is going to be a tough go. More people are paying attention this time around.

8 posted on 05/25/2010 6:50:26 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

If Cheney did it, it must be okay!


9 posted on 05/25/2010 6:53:37 AM PDT by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

This makes me very happy

Kinda stupud but serious question, Were so many of W’s supporters this blind?

I have voted for Bush 4 times but I was plenty angry with him plenty of times, for things now that are so minor compared to 0dumbo.
In all that anger I never worried he was taking America down a path that would damage us and reduce us.

Can 0dumbo’s supporters not see what he is doing? Or are there that many people that want us to slide and want us to become a nanny state?


10 posted on 05/25/2010 7:00:17 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” — 18 USC Sec. 211 — Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office


11 posted on 05/25/2010 7:02:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

When all else fails blame Bush.

If that fails, blame Cheney.


12 posted on 05/25/2010 7:04:23 AM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

What a maroon.

It’s understandable, given their love of rigging elections, that Democrats don’t understand the difference between elective and appointive office.


13 posted on 05/25/2010 7:04:26 AM PDT by denydenydeny (The welfare state turns us all into zoo animals, mouths open, waiting for the next feeding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The press is showing a LITTLE interest in this, but if similar allegations had been made against the Bush admin, the press would be in full feeding-frenzy mode by now, and the scandal would have been given a name - “Jobgate” or “Promisegate” or some such thing.


14 posted on 05/25/2010 7:05:24 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No it is not... one is actually... you know... codified into Federal law and the other is called an endorsement... and that this is just another satanic verse from the dims.

LLS


15 posted on 05/25/2010 7:11:36 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Chuck Todd learned how to root for this administration when he worked for a Mexican whorehouse.


16 posted on 05/25/2010 7:22:37 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
Then blame the evil Republicans. Then blame the disgruntled tea partiers. Then blame those nasty corporate honchos that gave Obama all that money, more money than any other politician....ever. Then blame Grandma Dunham, the typical white person.
We have the blame game president and the blame game fans.
17 posted on 05/25/2010 7:31:08 AM PDT by madinmadtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

“For the NBC Political Director and chief White House correspondent this morning equated the Obama admin’s apparent offer of a top job to Joe Sestak with Dick Cheney’s reported offer to support Tim Pawlenty in a subsequent gubernatorial run if he would get out of a Senate primary against Norm Coleman.”

If Todd’s theory is correct, then Blago ought to walk, on grounds that his seeking a job in exchange for naming a particular person to fill Obama’s Senate seat is as innocent as Dick Cheney’s offering to campaign for Pawlenty.


18 posted on 05/25/2010 7:34:01 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Newsboys should not play lawyer:

Sestak case deepens--did White House commit a felony by offering a job to Sestak?

Commentary from Judge Napolitano:

Well the ramifications are potentially enormous. I mean to offer someone something of value in order to affect their official behavior as a member of Congress is a felony. We call it a bribe. To offer someone something of value to affect the outcome of an election is a felony. Each of those carries five years with them. The government has an affirmative obligation to investigate this.And Congressman Sestak who is a decent guy, we've all interviewed him. He sent you handwritten thank you notes after he was on your show, whether he agrees with you or not. Congressman Sestak has an obligation to tell the truth. Who offered him a job? What was the quid pro quo and what was the job? If he doesn't say that voluntarily a federal prosecutor should bring him before a grand jury and the grand jurors will inquire of his knowledge as we like to say.

19 posted on 05/25/2010 7:35:28 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrC
“Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” — 18 USC Sec. 211 — Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office

That looks pretty cut and dried to me.

I'm also wondering if Sestak reported the attempted bribe to the authorities, and if not, could he be in any legal jeopardy for failing to do so?

20 posted on 05/25/2010 7:40:32 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; Liz; hoosiermama; onyx; STARWISE

How cozy.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/blogs/yeas-and-nays/Sightings_-Rahm-Emanuel-and-Chuck-Todd-want-private-time-93984589.html

Rahm Emanuel and Chuck Todd want private time
By: Nikki Schwab and Tara Palmeri
Washington Examiner
05/17/10 9:00 PM EDT

NBC Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel were spotted at the Oval Room on Monday afternoon sitting down for lunch.

For a starter, both ordered white asparagus soup and then Todd went on to the tuna tartare and Emanuel went with a chicken Caesar salad. The restaurant manager told Yeas & Nays they specifically requested for “an area where they could talk” (away from the common folk, that is).

“It’s a lovely status symbol for both of them,” a fellow member of the White House press corps told Yeas & Nays, noting most don’t get the chance to dine casually with top administration officials.

(snip)


21 posted on 05/25/2010 8:22:04 AM PDT by maggief ((Fair use))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Rahm Emanuel and Chuck Todd get private lunch time: “It’s a lovely status symbol for both of them,” a member of the White House press corps said, noting most don’t get the chance to dine casually with top administration officials.

STAY TUNED Manipulating the media in this lavish manner? The question is what other messages did Rahm want Chuck to plant in his news broadcast. BTW, the buzz is Rahm and George Stephanpoli phone-talk every morning.

Chuck Todd

22 posted on 05/25/2010 8:40:41 AM PDT by Liz (If teens can procreate in a Volkswagen, why does a spotted owl need 2000 acres? JD Hayworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Good one Mark. The limits some people will go to defend this administration continues to amaze me. Shouldn’t, but it still does.

I tweeted Chuck and told him it ‘wasn’t his finest moment’ but didn’t get a reply of course.

:)

Keep up the good work.


23 posted on 05/25/2010 9:12:42 AM PDT by Chuck54 (Dollar-A-Day Freeper (on fixed income). Join the club please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

Thanks, Chuck. Glad you enjoyed it: I’ll stay on the case!


24 posted on 05/25/2010 10:48:24 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Hey, what’s a little lunch between close friends? /s


25 posted on 05/25/2010 12:00:05 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson