Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senior White House Official: UN Sanctions Alone "Would Not Be Sufficient"to Change Iran's Behavior
abc ^ | 6/10/10 | jake tapper

Posted on 06/10/2010 10:28:18 AM PDT by Nachum

THE WHITE HOUSE, WASHINGTON, DC -- Senior White House officials acknowledged Wednesday afternoon that the new regime of UN Security Council sanctions against Iran “would not be sufficient” in and of itself to change the behavior of the Iranian government and convince its leaders to stop its nuclear weapons program.

But, they emphasized, these sanctions are just the beginning – the “1” of a “1,2,3 punch,” as one senior White House official put it.

The next step: on June 17 the European Council will meet and impose even stricter sanctions on Iran. Then Congress will pass additional tough sanctions, which the President will sign.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: official; sanctions; senior; un

1 posted on 06/10/2010 10:28:19 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Can you say duh....

kicking Israel's a** should boost Iran's confidence...

2 posted on 06/10/2010 10:30:16 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


3 posted on 06/10/2010 10:30:58 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
,i>these sanctions are just the beginning – the “1” of a “1,2,3 punch,”

....????...aren't we up to punches 326,327,328?

4 posted on 06/10/2010 10:35:14 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Senior White House Official: UN Sanctions Alone “Would Not Be Sufficient”to Change Iran’s Behavior”

ya think?


5 posted on 06/10/2010 10:35:24 AM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
There is nothing that will change Iran's mind about nuclear weapons, they want to be armed with them. They don't care what we think, they know that the world does not have the will to attack them, and that's the only thing that will stop them.
6 posted on 06/10/2010 10:35:25 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Translation: We always knew that sanctions were an empty exercise, but we felt we needed to go through with them so that when Iran gets the bomb - as we desired all along, I might add - we will still maintain a certain plausible deniability, as least as far as the water-carrying MSM is concerned.
7 posted on 06/10/2010 10:36:02 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Tape those sanctions to some 500 pounders and then you might get their attention.


8 posted on 06/10/2010 10:40:34 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (The 0bama regime represents an "Clear and Present Danger" to the US - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yes! That worked so well with Iraq.

Senior White House Officials must be:

A few bricks short of a load.

A few cards short of a full .

A fries short of a happy meal.

A few crumpets short of a proper tea.

A few sandwiches short of a picnic.

A few beers short of a six-pack.

A few clowns short of a circus.


9 posted on 06/10/2010 10:42:45 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Left said we shouldn’t use sanctions on nations anyway.

Remember their constant bitching about the sanctions against Iraq?


10 posted on 06/10/2010 10:47:05 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
But, they emphasized, these sanctions are just the beginning – the “1” of a “1,2,3 punch

I hope Israel is standing by with 2 and 3

11 posted on 06/10/2010 10:48:16 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Iran will get nuclear weapons. This is inevitable, I fear. Upon using such a weapon, the world mood then would allow coalition forces to annilate the current Iranian regime, I believe.


12 posted on 06/10/2010 12:37:59 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson