Posted on 06/27/2010 12:57:05 AM PDT by Yosemitest
Sincerely, Yosemitest.
She could contact her Congressman and ask him to look into it.
We’ve told her that, thanks.
Some AP info.:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i0IPXxM7V9VkuCYyf7sezTS-POaQD9GJCRE00
U.S. Division of the company:
http://www.ericksonaircrane.com/
No problem...it looks like they operate Sikorsky S64’s in Malaysia: (Not Kaman “K-MAX’s”)
http://www.ericksonaircrane.com/globalpresence.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-64_Skycrane
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaman_K-max
All the current news write-ups:
http://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dRfEkeJy8WLalgMmmxeT-R0ON8YiM&hl=en-US&ned=us
Helicopter crashes in Malaysia; US pilot killed"
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — A helicopter used to transport timber crashed in a remote Malaysian rain forest on Borneo island, killing the American pilot and injuring the co-pilot, officials said Sunday.
The helicopter went down Friday in a logging zone in Malaysia's eastern Sarawak state, a district police official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to make public statements.
The American pilot was killed and his co-pilot was hospitalized, the official said Saturday. Authorities have not determined the cause of the accident.
Malaysia's New Straits Times newspaper and national news agency, Bernama, identified the pilot who was killed as William Charles Scott, 51, from Meridian, Mississippi, and the other man as David William Bergin, 49, from Bend, Oregon.
Bergin, who had a fractured hand, spinal injury and other bruises, told the New Straits Times at a Sarawak hospital that the helicopter went into an uncontrollable spin before it crashed.
"That's all I could recall. It happened in a flash," the Times on Sunday quoted him as saying.
A nurse at Sarawak's Columbia Asia Medical Center confirmed that Bergin was a patient, but said he was not able to come to the phone. She could not give information about when he might be released from the hospital.
A U.S. Embassy representative in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia's main city, said she was aware of the accident but could not release the pilots' identities because of the embassy's privacy policy.
The helicopter was operated by the Malaysian subsidiary of Portland, Oregon-based Erickson Air-Crane Inc., which harvests timber for Malaysian loggers in Borneo. A company employee based in Sarawak also confirmed the crash and the pilot's death, but she could not give details and declined to be identified.
Thanks again, to everyone.
>>”..the helicopter went into an uncontrollable spin before it crashed.”
That indicates a “tail rotor failure,” Either at a hover, or at low speed. The tail rotor counteracts the torque of the engine turning the main rotor. When the tail rotor quits, the fuselage naturally begins rotation opposite to the main rotor.
When in forward flight, the apparent wind form its passage through the air tends to keep the tail where it belongs. I don’t know how well that would work in the “flying crane — it looks like a smallish tail, for the torque they must generate.
Your friend may want to know this, but maybe not. If she is desperate for more information, she MIGHT try contacting Evergreen Aviation (503.472.9361). They are a competitor, based near Portland. They fly that same helicopter, and will probably know more details, and might tell her more if she tells them she is the pilot’s mother.
DG
p.s. This type of accident is not likely pilot error.
A 3rd world government...
With an accident in a remote location...
--AND--
A non-commercial/non-passenger operation--
Hmmm....
The basics are all anyone will likely found out. (Unless there is private industry/insurance experts who will sort through the wreckage and witness statements to ascertain causes)
Without some concrete evidence of cause -- placing blame and recovering damages nearly impossible. IOW -an aircraft with a bad reputation or known design flaws -- is NOT proof certain of the cause of a single incident or accident.
Hope this helps
I am sorry for your friend's loss --
Thank you. I’ll pass it on, to his mother.
The FAA and NTSB will likely become involved, especially in a 3rd world incident where they do not have the expertise for mishap investigations.
The company would welcome such oversight and assistance from US government because they know the US investigators will be first looking for cause, not blame.
The manufacturer wants to know the real cause because they might need to fix something. IF the cause is determined and it turns out it happens again, and in court it is shown “they” knew the cause beforehand and did nothing about it, the company would be sued out of existence.
It is in their best interest of everyone to find out the facts.
Cause can help determine the sequence of events that happened. Then “blame” may be determined.
Having a third world country ban American assistance would be a sign of something fishy.
But FAA/NTSB teams jurisdiction ends at US Borders
-- OR --
..In some cases involving joint certified operations the teams have extended jurisdiction).
(e.g. One of our airliners crashes in europe -- or a European commercial bird governed by joint certificate operations is lost in Asia...
Otherwise -- they only go where they are invited by the governing jurisdiction / nation -- and the bills are paid by same.
I would look to the insurance investigators for expertise and outcome -- they have a dog in the hunt.... and will usually come up with the answers.
I agree with DG.... smells like tail rotor failure.... or aerodynamic "blanking" due to rotorwash bouncing of the ground or a hillside and effectively "stalling" the tail rotor.
The K-MAX wasn’t as intuitive as others, but it was a very stable aircraft
Let me read this more, I still know people at KAMAN
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.