Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Enacts Rules Inhibiting Media From Covering Oil Spill
Newsbusters ^ | 7/3/10 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 07/03/2010 9:03:54 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

White House Enacts Rules Inhibiting Media From Covering Oil Spill By Noel Sheppard Created 07/03/2010 - 11:28

The White House Thursday enacted stronger rules to prevent the media from showing what's happening with the oil spill in the Gulf Coast.

CNN's Anderson Cooper reported that evening, "The Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping photographers and reporters and anyone else from coming within 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches -- 65 feet."

He elaborated, "Now, in order to get closer, you have to get direct permission from the Coast Guard captain of the Port of New Orleans. You have to call up the guy. What this means is that oil-soaked birds on islands surrounded by boom, you can't get close enough to take that picture."

As the segment continued, Cooper expressed disgust with this rule repeating several times, "We are not the enemy here" (video follows with transcript and commentary, h/t Cubachi [1] via Hot Air [2]):

ANDERSON COOPER, HOST: But we begin, as we do every night, "Keeping Them Honest".

This time, however, we're not talking about BP. We're talking about the government, a new a rule announced today backed by the force of law and the threat of fines and felony charges, a rule that will prevent reporters and photographers and anyone else from getting anywhere close to booms and oil-soaked wildlife and just about any place we need to be.

By now, you're probably familiar with cleanup crews stiff-arming the media, private security blocking cameras, ordinary workers clamming up, some not even saying who they're working for because they're afraid of losing their jobs.

BP has said again and again that's not their policy. Yet, again and again, it has happened. And we have seen it. But that's BP.

And now the government apparently is getting in on the act, despite what Admiral Thad Allen promised about transparency just nearly a month ago. Here is what he said back then.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ADMIRAL THAD ALLEN (RET.), NATIONAL INCIDENT COMMANDER: I have put out a written directive -- and I can provide it for the record -- that says the media will have uninhibited access anywhere we're doing operations, except for two things, if it's a security or a safety problem. That is my policy.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Uninhibited access, unless it's a security or safety problem.

Well, the Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping photographers and reporters and anyone else from coming within 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches -- 65 feet.

Now, in order to get closer, you have to get direct permission from the Coast Guard captain of the Port of New Orleans. You have to call up the guy. What this means is that oil-soaked birds on islands surrounded by boom, you can't get close enough to take that picture.

Shots of oil on beaches with booms, stay 65 feet away. Pictures of oil-soaked booms uselessly laying in the water because they haven't been collected like they should, you can't get close enough to see that. And, believe me, that is out there.

But you only know that if you get close to it, and now you can't without permission. Violators could face a fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges.

What's even more extraordinary is that the Coast Guard tried to make the exclusion zone 300 feet, before scaling it back to 65 feet.

Here is how Admiral Allen defends it.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ALLEN: Well, it's not unusual at all for the Coast Guard to establish either safety or security zones around any number of facilities or activities for public safety or for the safety of the equipment itself. We would do this for marine events, fireworks demonstrations, cruise ships going in and out of port.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: So, this is the exact same logic that federal wildlife officials used to prevent CNN on two occasions from getting pictures of oiled birds that have been collected, pictures like -- like the -- well, that we're about to show you which are obviously deeply disturbing, pictures of oiled gulls that we just happened to catch. Suddenly, we were told after -- after that day we couldn't catch it anymore. So, keeping prying eyes out of marshes, away from booms, off the beaches is now government policy.

When asked why now, after all this time, Thad Allen said he had gotten some complaints from local officials worried people might get hurt. Now, we don't know who these officials are. We would like to. But transparency is apparently not a high priority with Thad Allen either these days.

Maybe he is accurate and some officials are concerned. And that's their right. But we've heard far more from local officials about not being able to get a straight story from the government or BP. I have met countless local officials desperate for pictures to be taken and stories written about what is happening in their communities.

We're not the enemy here. Those of us down here trying to accurately show what's happening, we are not the enemy. I have not heard about any journalist who has disrupted relief efforts. No journalist wants to be seen as having slowed down the cleanup or made things worse. If a Coast Guard official asked me to move, I would move.

But to create a blanket rule that everyone has to stay 65 feet away boom and boats, that doesn't sound like transparency. Frankly, it's a lot like in Katrina when they tried to make it impossible to see recovery efforts of people who died in their homes.

If we can't show what is happening, warts and all, no one will see what's happening. And that makes it very easy to hide failure and hide incompetence and makes it very hard to highlight the hard work of cleanup crews and the Coast Guard. We are not the enemy here.

We found out today two public broadcasting journalists reporting on health issues say they have been blocked again and again from visiting a federal mobile medical unit in Venice, a trailer where cleanup workers are being treated. It's known locally as the BP compound. And these two reporters say everyone they have talked to, from BP to the Coast Guard, to Health and Human Services in Washington has been giving them the runaround.

We're not talking about a CIA station here. We're talking about a medical trailer that falls under the authority of, guess who, Thad Allen, the same Thad Allen who promised transparency all those weeks ago.

We are not the enemy here.

Actually, Anderson, to this administration, anyone trying to tell the truth to the American people is the enemy.

Maybe if folks like you would have accurately reported the background of Barack Obama when he was running for president he wouldn't have assumed you were going to continue to misrepresent and ignore facts for his benefit after if he got elected.

To anyone with even a lukewarm intelligence quotient, this was an eminently foreseeable consequence of the media treating candidate Obama like a rock star. If they had acted like journalists back then instead of groupies, maybe they'd be treated with more respect today.

Now that some press members actually want to act like reporters again and aggressively try to cover what's going on in the Gulf Coast, the White House must feel somewhat spurned by his previously complicit press thereby necessitating rules to keep them from getting close to the truth now that they mysteriously seem interested in reporting it.

Of course, those on the other side of the aisle are not at all surprised, for like so many of the promises this man made during the campaign, we didn't believe his most transparent administration in history pledge either.

Maybe in the future media won't allow their love for a candidate to make them so gullible and compliant, but I wouldn't count on it.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 65feet; birds; booms; bp; censorship; cultureofcorruption; cwii; deepwaterhorizon; dncemperor; july; mediablackout; noaccountability; nopress; notransparency; obamascandals; obamasfault; obamunism; oilspill; pressembargo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-343 next last
To: Sub-Driver

If the owner of the vessel invites media personnel, the coast guard can’t say squat. I understand keeping a safe distance from people trying to work on this issue, but I also understand this government’s desire to cover up the truth at all costs.

My answer to the 65 foot rule is a longer lens and one of those parabolic dish microphones like they use on the sideline at football games. You can sit 100+ feet away and get good pictures and video with sound if that’s your desire.

I propose that there isn’t a lot going on on these boats that would constitute news. The media should direct their efforts to what the ‘rats are saying behind closed doors and under the veil of darkness.


81 posted on 07/03/2010 11:17:09 AM PDT by meyer (Big government is the enemy of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama is the enemy, along with Pelosi, Reid, et al.

CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and the liberals in Congress and in power have all been the willing troops, doing Obama's dirty work for two years now---that is, covering up for Obama and keeping the truth about him (and all the liberal leaders) from being seen by the voting public.

But, hey, Cooper, you had your chance to report what should have been shouted from the rooftops about candidate Obama and his anti-media tactics long ago during his campaign. You chose to ignore it. You chose to glorify this guy, make him "untouchable" and unaccountable. You ignored the conservatives who did their research when you would not and who clearly saw Obama for a fraud and a wanna-be dictator.

Now, don't cry "victim" when you put him in the White House.

82 posted on 07/03/2010 11:19:40 AM PDT by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

bttt


83 posted on 07/03/2010 11:23:23 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba
Al Gore, on his personal site, June 14, 2010 :

...A pilot wanted to take a photographer from The Times-Picayune of New Orleans to snap photographs of the oil slicks blackening the water. The response from a BP contractor who answered the phone late last month at the command center was swift and absolute: Permission denied.”

This behavior is completely unacceptable. Access by reporters should be as unfettered as possible. This de facto form of censorship needs to stop.

The web site of the tabloid Star magazine, 25 hours and 27 minutes later:

Al Gore‘s split from wife Tipper after 40 years of marriage was a shock to everyone who thought theirs was the ideal marriage. Now Star can exclusively reveal that the former Vice President was having an affair with Larry David‘s ex-wife — for the past two years!

84 posted on 07/03/2010 11:27:55 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
“Since when are our seas and public lands Private property of the filthy government?

See Law of Eminent Domain.

See Parks in Arizona that have been CLOSED by the government due to infiltration by Mexican Ganglords.

Why do you think you have to pay TAX on your land?”

We own NO land only lease from the crooked government.

85 posted on 07/03/2010 11:38:35 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What next! White House Enacts Rules Inhibiting Media From Covering Hurricanes?


86 posted on 07/03/2010 12:05:09 PM PDT by diji (IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat
We own NO land only lease from the crooked government.

If you understand that, then why did you ask that question?

Was it satire, and I didn't get it?

87 posted on 07/03/2010 12:13:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

bump


88 posted on 07/03/2010 12:25:01 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“We own NO land only lease from the crooked government.

If you understand that, then why did you ask that question?

Was it satire, and I didn’t get it?”

You answered the question;We paid for the use of the Beaches and are Now denied the use of them.


89 posted on 07/03/2010 12:31:39 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
As the segment continued, Cooper expressed disgust with this rule repeating several times, "We are not the enemy here"

Sorry Nancy Boy, but you are 'the enemy'.

VIDEO Your government can kill you (9:42 long)
and....
MARTIAL LAW ALERT: Gulf Coast Evacuation Scenario Summer/Fall 2010

It's 'funny' (not) that The Gulf Coast Evacuation is (or would be) just in time for the November elections, where every prediction has it that the CommieRATS are going to lose big time. And just another odd coincidence I'm sure, that those who will be under the thumb of Martial Law - and 'ruled' by Oberstgruppenführer Eric Holder, are from all those pesky 'Red States'.

And if all those 'Red States' are to be evacuated and under Martial Law to boot, that sure would help the CommirTATS keep control of Congress, now wouldn't it.

Now I'm suuuuure that there's really nothing to see here. So we may as well just move along.

Lock and Load FRiends, 'it's coming'.

90 posted on 07/03/2010 12:35:27 PM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So all it takes to get the USCG to change their rules is for a local person to express concern. Yeah, right. Man, it’s harder and harder to respect the higher ranked military sell outs.


91 posted on 07/03/2010 12:42:27 PM PDT by Terry Mross ( I voted for McCain and still feel like I wasted my vote. Vote third party - same results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow! The first (and only) concerted and coordinated action from the Obamunist White House regarding the oil spill cleanup is to muzzle the press!

Hey, fascists is as fascists does!


92 posted on 07/03/2010 1:09:37 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the Right Stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I wonder if you’ll ever figure this out...in time to recognize how useful you have been to them.


Useful as in “Useful Idiot”.


93 posted on 07/03/2010 1:20:47 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Won will tell us what we need to know. No need to concern the common man when there’s really nothing to see. It’s better if the government takes care of it. They know best. More kool-aid anyone?


94 posted on 07/03/2010 1:22:53 PM PDT by FourPeas (God Save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I think there’s more to this issue than just how far from a scene photograpers and journalists have to be located.

The reason for the censorship, its goal, is to shield Obama from critisism and prtotect his ‘reputation’. If I’m correct, then this extends all through the media and involves control of ANYTHING negative about Obama’s and the government’s performance in the environmental recovery of that oil spill. The government is, in essence, going to control the message in an old fashioned soviet-style manner.

This has the stink of deep-seated censorship, so watch the demeanor of the media, we should notice continuing resentment. I suspect that right now we’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg. If I’m correct, as time goes along, it will become more apparent.


95 posted on 07/03/2010 1:28:12 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

bump


96 posted on 07/03/2010 1:32:23 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (U S Troops Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Obama’s reputation is already sullied and ruined for good among reasonable folks. Every bit of legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by Obama was done so with virtually no details announced. In each case, there were ulterior motives associated with each win for him. I smell something rotten in this and all citizens should keep their eyes peeled on him right now.


97 posted on 07/03/2010 1:54:37 PM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I hope the press is enjoying the tyranny they elected.

It's not like you can trust them anyway.

98 posted on 07/03/2010 1:55:24 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Can you still vote when you’ve been evacuated and under martial law?


99 posted on 07/03/2010 2:21:49 PM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
If we can't show what is happening, warts and all, no one will see what's happening. And that makes it very easy to hide failure and hide incompetence and makes it very hard to highlight the hard work of cleanup crews and the Coast Guard. We are not the enemy here.

Someone is grappling with a major conflict of conscience here.

On the one hand Cooper is saying that it's his job as a journalist to report the facts, while on the other hand he's admitting that by covering up, it "makes it very easy to hide failure and hide incompetence" ... playing both sides of the same coin.

Astonishingly, Mr Cooper betrays his real interest in saying that he wants to show "the hard work of cleanup crews and the Coast Guard", and goes on to beg the government impediment as "We are not the enemy here".

No mention whatsoever of the disaster itself, just a self serving complaint that the government isn't allowing him and his journalists to show the cleanup effort in a better light.

That's my take on this, your mileage may vary .....
-- MM

100 posted on 07/03/2010 2:50:40 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-343 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson