Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RKV

Parker VS. Washington D.C.
Robert Levy

Heller VS. Washington D.C.
Robert Levy and the National Rifle Association

McDonald VS. Chicago
The Second Amendment Foundation and the National Rifle Association

Benson VS. Chicago
The National Rifle Association

Kachalsky VS. Cacace
The Second Amendment Foundation

During Heller, the goa was the only gun group to ask for the narrow view forcing the other gun groups to sue for every gun law on the books. During McDonald, the goa filed a brief that mentioned the NRA’s position nine times.


10 posted on 07/15/2010 6:18:39 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shooter 2.5

You forgot

Nordyke v. King
Sykes v. McGinness
Pena v. Cid
Jacobs v. Reed
Peterson v. LaCabe
Bateman v. Perdue
Hanson v. DC
Maloney v Rice and
State Ammunition Inc. v. Lindley


11 posted on 07/15/2010 6:22:57 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Shooter 2.5
During Heller, the goa was the only gun group to ask for the narrow view forcing the other gun groups to sue for every gun law on the books. During McDonald, the goa filed a brief that mentioned the NRA’s position nine times.

it’s ‘ole 2.5, the GOA hating NRA member…

Here is a thread where you spewed your typical, and not very enlightened rant, without listening to a word someone else says… Typical 2.5 whining rant about the GOA.

and here you are in another thread and using your typical whining rant with me… 2.5 gets the real facts and then gets caught in a couple of, well let’s say... factual distortions.

And yet again, after being confronted with facts defeating your position you continue to defend the indefensible.

So after getting your butt severely kicked to the curb many times, you continue to resort to distortions, twisting everyone’s words and in some cases; out right lying about your actions in an attempt to defend your pitifully weak bias.

Even so, I tried to reach out over a year after you told your usual fibs and help you see the error of your non-question, but you again went back to your old ways of unfairly attacking fellow 2A groups.

When you finally see your stands falling apart, you then stoop to a new low and start personally attacking people that disagree with your thoughts in the debate…2.5 attacks fellow FReepers that are engaged in the 2A discussion, and if that wasn’t bad enough, YOU ATTACKED THE WRONG PERSON! and again a couple of days later in another thread you again personally attacked fellow FReepers… 2.5 again attacks fellow FReepers that are engaged in a 2A discussion.

Many people have answered your questions and countered your stands in-numerous times… you just refuse to see it. Point is, if you can’t have an honest debate fighting a common enemy, then do everyone else a favor… stay on the sidelines and argue with yourself, don’t try to distort the focus of this fight.

Every 2A group, no matter what you may think of them should be WELCOMED to the struggle we are facing, many former NRA members, myself included, who definitely have no love for the NRA leadership have been going back into the group because the stakes are so high, don’t let your petty bias cloud the big picture.

AOV sends with warmest regards.

18 posted on 07/16/2010 2:37:18 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson