Posted on 07/17/2010 4:55:05 PM PDT by Cindy
Note: Photo included. "France: Riots over killing of Muslim man Cars burned, police shot at after authorities kill hold-up suspect near Grenoble" News agencies Published: 07.17.10, 17:47 / Israel News
SNIPPET: "Rioters burned cars, attacked a tramway and shot at police in the French city of Grenoble overnight in protest at the death of a local Muslim man, identified as 27-year- old Karim Boudouda, fleeing police after allegedly holding up the city's casino."
SNIPPET: "Police said they intervened after local residents stopped a tramway by setting a fire on the rails and stoned it. At least 50 cars were burned and police said they were shot at once and returned fire."
SNIPPET: "The trouble followed a hold-up in a casino in nearby Uriage-les-Bains by two armed men in the early hours of Friday."
Police said the duo fled with 20,000-40,000 euros and were chased by police. Police said the suspects opened fire, wounding an officer, and one of the suspected robbers was killed in the ensuing shooting.
The second man fled into Villeneuve, where police helicopters flew overhead for much of the night in a fruitless attempt to locate him."
(Excerpt) Read more at ynetnews.com ...
Here we go again!
This happens every summer in France.
Hat Tip for article: Jihad Watch
Hat Tip for video: Atlas Shrugs
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80OZsubiPJE
“Riots in Grenoble, France”
Video description - quote:
MrComptetemporaire | July 17, 2010
Riots in Grenoble, France.
Two heavily armed immigrants, muslim arabs, robbed a casino.
Trying to escape police by shooting at them, one were shot in the head, of course to death.
Immigrants declared to journalists from the first french TV channel (TF1) :
“You killed one of ours. Anyway, you are a dirty race, we are going to kill you too.”
“Everything that is european, we are going to shoot you.”
http://lci.tf1.fr/france/faits-divers...
Category:
News & Politics
Tags:
Riots in Grenoble France
Isn't returning fire a new response?
See? It really was just a little cultural misunderstanding after all. If we would only take the time to understand them.......
http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en
Note: Photos included in both articles.
#
SNIPPET - quote:
“Vous avez tué un des nôtres. On va vous tuer aussi”
Par TF1 News (avec agence), le 17 juillet 2010 à 07h20, mis à jour le 17 juillet 2010 à 12:01
Alors que le quartier de la Villeneuve, à Grenoble, a vécu une nuit de heurts violents, les casseurs crient leur haine des policiers. Syndicats de police et élus locaux réclament des moyens supplémentaires alors que le “seuil de rupture” est atteint.
#
SNIPPET - quote:
http://lci.tf1.fr/france/faits-divers/2010-07/scenes-de-guerilla-urbaine-a-grenoble-5928404.html
Scènes de guérilla urbaine à Grenoble
Par TF1 News (avec agence), le 17 juillet 2010 à 07h18, mis à jour le 17 juillet 2010 à 18:13
Des groupes de jeunes armés de battes de base-ball et de barres de fer, voire d’armes à feu, ont affronté les forces de l’ordre pendant une partie de la nuit dans un quartier sensible de Grenoble. A l’origine de ces heurts : la mort d’un jeune poursuivi après un braquage.
I’d have to go back a year or so and look, but I believe near the end of the summer fighting back was in vogue.
Actually several months ago I came across a little website that provided statistics regarding an ongoing urban war in France. In other words, cars are torched, police are confronted, areas of France can no longer be entered by police without massive numbers of riot clad officers etc. The blogist said that there is a permanent media blackout so by the time we hear about it, it really must be bad in that we must assume some burning of cars or bottle rockets thrown at police as regular ‘background noise.’
end of the summer (previous years) - clarification.
It is now a war of conquest by the Muslims. The French are now faced with only two options: submit or fight.
No offense intended but why do posters insist on butchering articles by removing sections and putting “snip” or “snippet”? If you want people to read the article then post paragraphs and end a sentence mid way so people will click on the link (if it’s interesting). It seems so manipulative on the part of the poster I don’t even want to investigate any further.
If there’s a legitimate reason for this practice please tell me. Maybe I’m overlooking something but as it is, posters are ‘butchering’ written material in order to manipulate the reader
Easy, obvious, and effective solution: shoot rioters on sight, cover them with bacon, and bury them.
Alternative: let them get away with it and lose your country.
Perhaps if the cops had beheaded the man there’d be no riots.
Is an equation?
What the muslims are to the French is the same
as what the blacks are to Oakland?
What do they have in common?
hEY, we have the same blackmail here by our minorities, Blacks or latinos...You mess with us or don’t give us what we want or hurt one of our Homies...we will riot!
We made that Devil’s Deal in the 60’s...now WE HERE either have to fight or submit...and with Holder and Obozo..gonna be harder than ever.
I say the French should shoot a muslim every time a car gets torched.
Wow! Grenoble is one of my stopping points in France. My wife and I visited last December while I was there on business. The trams were the model for the ones recently built in Phoenix and they are identical.
Grenoble is a university city with lots of students. It is surrounded by mountains, but it is at a fairly low altitude which keeps the climate nice.
Must have started under Sarkozy
I have used this snip technique when an article starts to say something, goes into blah blah blah blah, and then goes back to finishing the first idea. When I read snipped articles, I actually like it because somebody has called attention to the ‘good parts’.
Glad you aren’t there right now.
I believe the punchline would be: "It's a good start."
About 5 years back they were reporting about 50 cars torched every night for the whole country. Even 10 years ago there were neighborhoods “off limits” to the police.
Our company had an American in Paris who, as a favor, would write us travel guidelines. He told us that one of the major subway stations should be avoided after dark. It was such a large station that we didn’t pay attention to him. While we were there the police came strolling through with a contingent of 7 officers and 2 police dogs. They usually don’t travel in such large numbers.
After that, we payed closer attention!
France has become a complete shambles. More dysfunctional than ever before.
Remember when they had the Winter Olympics there?
Mayhem in Grenoble (Photo: AFP)
ML/NJ
Probably non-lethal cheese bullets.
The only solution is for Western countries to outlaw Islam and to make the penalty for practicing Islam deportation.
Which isn’t going to happen.
Which means there’s no solution.
LOL.... like they have a choice....
Roll a large container of pigfluid, a high pressure spray nozzle, and a large sign in Arabic that identifies it as such, down the street.
I'm sure even the French will find the survivors very cooperative
I'm sure even the French will find the survivors very cooperative
So, muslims can cut off the heads of infidels and they’re heroes, but nobody has the right to kill a muzzie after committing a crime in a country he’s not native to?
We are in big danger in this country. This is our future is nothing is done.
Agreed, but the number of torched cars is obscene!
They do. They're making it.
Returning fire is racist.
“stopped a tramway...and stoned it.” Sharia-Lite?
Comes with being an “open” society.
The wolves (Communist one-world government goons using Islam as a tool to defeat the west) are at our door as well, folks.
I agree.
Every rioter should be shot on site as they riot.
That would fix the problem by eliminating current rioters and deterring future rioters.
The French have let it get to the point where the police must use that much force to take back the country from the radical islamists.
This effective tactic will not be used of course and more of the same will be perpetrated by the islamists.
The number of words in an article is limited for a post. That is why some “snip” and put the important parts in the post, and FReepers are free to read the rest by clicking on the link provided. That is one reason. Also, some publications only allow us to post a synopsis, and want readers to go to their own websites. You can see this in the rules of posting. Those are the two main reasons, and we have to use this method.
“Which means theres no solution.”
Well, if our “leaders” would stick to, and defend, the constitution and our way of life, it wouldn’t be much of a problem.
As it is, far too many of our “leaders” ignore the constitution, or they want it destroyed.
Political correctness (invented by communists) is what has led to ALL of this.
I would rather decide the ‘good parts’ for myself.
oh no, they didn’t say that... they are the religion of peace after all...../sarcasm
Hello. I am a mooslim. ANYTHING you do pisses me off. I will kill you and your children. Your existence pisses me off.
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Bring it on darlin’
Yes I understand the reasoning and the rules. It’s not necessary to butcher an article in order to be in compliance with the rules. I’m just particular that way; if there is an article that is seemingly of interest, I would prefer to decide for myself whether or not it’s worth my time to click on the link and not ‘have’ to just to see what the second paragraph (or sentence) says because someone decided to remove it and put ‘SNIP’.
Me too. But if the good parts are buried in too much unrelated drivel, I sometimes I don’t read far enough and would otherwise miss something of interest to me. I also like it when bloggers post a large official document and bold key text. That way I can figure out why they posted it. If I am wondering ‘where is this going’ and skip down to a snip or bold section sometimes it helps me avoid leftie text dressed up as reasonable text or decide that the author started out with something good and got off track. Ultimately, after reading the entire text, I will decide what the good parts are for myself -but I like the snip or bold preview.
“It is now a war of conquest by the Muslims. The French are now faced with only two options: submit or fight.”
Irony of ironies: France just may fight. We all know Britain has already surrendered. Hence, the irony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.