Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Judiciary Committee OKs Elena Kagan as Supreme Court Justice
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ ^ | July 20, 2010

Posted on 07/20/2010 9:43:27 AM PDT by Steelfish

Ticker Tape: BREAKING NEWS: Senate Judiciary Committee OKs Elena Kagan as Supreme Court Justice

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: elenakagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2010 9:43:31 AM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

What a surprise!!!! (not!)


2 posted on 07/20/2010 9:44:45 AM PDT by NYer ("God dwells in our midst, in the Blessed Sacrament of the altar." St. Maximilian Kolbe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Surprise Surprise Surprise. Who would have guessed.


3 posted on 07/20/2010 9:45:13 AM PDT by bikerman (Obama lied pelicans died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Specter is a yes........with concern!

Guess he figures he’s going to hell anyway.


4 posted on 07/20/2010 9:45:55 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Guess he figures he’s going to hell anyway.

Specter doesn't even realize he entered hell's city limits a long time ago.

5 posted on 07/20/2010 9:47:31 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The left won again!!! (Hits head on keyboard, over and over...)


6 posted on 07/20/2010 9:47:54 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

That was quick.
So, that’s it? She’s in?


7 posted on 07/20/2010 9:48:16 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Great news, not only is the Presidency bereft of standards but so is the Supreme Court. Jeepers, I imagine we can start opening up these positions to lower mammals next.


8 posted on 07/20/2010 9:48:56 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is a vote for partial-birth abortion, gays in the military, and homosexual marriage, affirmative action, the expulsion of religion from the public square, due process by civil trial for terrorists, denying free speech to corporations, and upholding ObamaCare with a vengeance!!!!!!!


9 posted on 07/20/2010 9:51:03 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Today is the 9 of Av. In the Jewish calendar, it’s the day both Temples were destroyed, the first crusade started, the first world war was declared, and some assorted nastiness. So, brace on...


10 posted on 07/20/2010 9:52:24 AM PDT by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Lindsey Graham voted with the Rats, I’m shocked, shocked I say!


11 posted on 07/20/2010 9:56:22 AM PDT by HenpeckedCon (What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sessions :
“Throughout her career, Ms. Kagan has placed her politics above the law. She has never been a judge, never tried a case before a jury and has practiced law for only three years. She is the least experienced nominee in the last half-century.”

Graham:
“This president chose someone who is qualified, who has the experience and knowledge to serve on this court ... and understands the difference between being a liberal judge and a politician.”

But for a single Republican vote - Graham - this nomination would not have left the committee.


12 posted on 07/20/2010 9:58:41 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Wake up America! You are losing the war against your families and your Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenpeckedCon

Dingy Harry will vote against her to keep the NRA in check.


13 posted on 07/20/2010 9:59:25 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish


Oh Joy !!
14 posted on 07/20/2010 10:01:49 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

No, no.

It goes to a full Senate vote.


15 posted on 07/20/2010 10:03:23 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

That’s the Senate Judiciary Committee recommendation — confirmation of the nomination still needs the majority vote of the entire Senate, but given that the Demagogues have a solid majority there’s no stopping her..... never was a chance to stop her confirmation, short of video of her committing heinous (in the eyes of liberals) crimes.... no, that would not have been enough, either. Leftists can get away with almost anything and still be embraced for the good of the ‘cause’....


16 posted on 07/20/2010 10:05:46 AM PDT by Enchante ("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I hate them. What a travesty. Snarlin Arlen’s curtain call.


17 posted on 07/20/2010 10:07:39 AM PDT by SueRae (I can see November from my HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Someone better "gets" the sarcasm on “This president chose someone who is qualified, who has the experience and knowledge to serve on this court ... and understands the difference between being a liberal judge and a politician.” by then. This is nasty stuff.
18 posted on 07/20/2010 10:08:33 AM PDT by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; RandallFlagg

How to Know the Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Member

How to Know the Supreme Court Confirmation Process Supreme Court Justices are nominated by the sitting President, but they must be approved by the Senate to get the job. After the official nomination by the President, the confirmation process begins. However, before the President officially nominates the candidate background checks, legal histories and opinions on key issues will be researched. This is often done to ensure confirmation as well as to guarantee that the nominee’s beliefs are aligned with the current administration.

Article II, Section 2 of US Constitution

Step 1
Submit the name(s) of Supreme Court nominees to Senate. The President formally presents the nominee’s name to the Senate, who then submits the nominee’s to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

Step 2
Submit names of Supreme Court nominees to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a full background examination. Although there are no requirements for becoming a Supreme Court Justice, it has become customary to conduct a full background check on all Supreme Court nominees.

Step 3
Know that the nominee and other witnesses appear at a hearing held by the Committee on the Judiciary. During this hearing the nominee will be questioned by the Senators on the Committee and others qualified to assess the capabilities of the nominee will be invited to testify. The Committee may question the nominees and witnesses on any topic for any length of time.

Step 4
Be aware that the Committee on the Judiciary votes on whether the entire Senate should reject or confirm the President’s nominee. The Committee will often send the nomination to the floor for a vote even if it rejects a candidate, although there’s only one nominee that the Committee has rejected, Reagan nominee Robert Bork. It should also be noted that Justice Clarence Thomas received a split Committee vote and no recommendation, but received confirmation on the Senate floor.

Step 5
Learn that the Senate receives the Committee recommendation for a vote, or possible discussion. If the Senate has pressing questions about the candidate they can choose to send it back to the Committee for further testimony. If no questions arise, the Senate votes. A simple majority is all that is required for the nominee to be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice.

Step 6
Filibuster against the nominee. If enough Senators want to prevent a nominee from receiving a vote they can filibuster, or stall the confirmation process. If this happens a three-fifths (3/5) majority vote is needed to stop the filibuster and confirm the nominee.

Read more: How to Know the Supreme Court Confirmation Process | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_2159715_supreme-court-confirmation-process.html#ixzz0uF83Gx3q


19 posted on 07/20/2010 10:09:17 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Great, now we get a wise lesbian to go along with a wise latina.


20 posted on 07/20/2010 10:10:55 AM PDT by Marathoner (And we thought Carter sucked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson