Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts Mess (health insurance reform)
Independent Women's Forum ^ | 23 July 2010 | Charlotte Hays

Posted on 07/24/2010 6:24:08 PM PDT by Lorianne

Marie-Grace Turner of the Galen Institute, one of the best health-care analysts out there, has done a remarkable study of the failing health care system in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts mess should matter to all of us.

"Massachusetts and the federal government built their reform efforts using similar architectural plans -- strict regulation of health insurance, mandates on individuals and businesses, expensive new taxpayer-funded subsidies, and a major expansion of Medicaid -- and both share a central structural flaw in failing to address rising health costs," Marie-Grace Turner writes.

A highlight from Turner's bullet-points on the monster costs in Massachusetts:

"On average, health insurance now costs $14,723 for a family of four in Massachusetts, compared to $13,027 nationally. That's nearly 12 percent higher than the national average. Reform has not made insurance more affordable," Turner notes.

"[S]ome small Massachusetts employers are dropping health insurance and sending their workers into the taxpayer-funded health insurance pool. They say they have no choice because of relentlessly rising costs. This spells trouble for taxpayers."

According to Turner, the Massachusetts system shows "the near impossibility of containing costs in a system where incentives go in exactly the opposite direction."

Read the whole thing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: badgovromney; deathcare; deathpanels; romney; romneybringsdeath; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneykilledgrandma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Lots of embedded links at source article.

Massachusetts Warning Signs http://www.galen.org/component,8/action,show_content/id,14/category_id,0/blog_id,1442/type,33/

1 posted on 07/24/2010 6:24:10 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Then why in Heavens name is Mitt Romney the top Republican candidate?


2 posted on 07/24/2010 6:34:32 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

You all remember when the time comes that it was Mitt Romney who was so proud of the fact that he was the one to shove this mess down our throats. Now they can’t control it.


3 posted on 07/24/2010 6:39:26 PM PDT by donhunt (Where does this totalitarian ashwipe get off telling me I can't chose for myself?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Money talks.


4 posted on 07/24/2010 6:40:34 PM PDT by donhunt (Where does this totalitarian ashwipe get off telling me I can't chose for myself?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
"Then why in Heavens name is Mitt Romney the top Republican candidate?"

Good question.
5 posted on 07/24/2010 6:44:59 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

Two words: Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin hasn’t made up her mind whether to throw her hat into the ring yet, or to use her kingmaking influence. Once she does either one, I think we’ll see Romney falling out of favor rather sharply.


6 posted on 07/24/2010 6:52:58 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oceander
"Then why in Heavens name is Mitt Romney the top Republican candidate?"

Because it's his turn. Thats how the GOP picks it's candidate. It was Pappa Bush's turn, it was Bob Dole's turn and last time it was McCain's turn.
7 posted on 07/24/2010 6:59:06 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Don’t bet that she won’t endorse or run with Romney.

After all, she just endorsed McCain & even as bad as Romney might be, he will get far more electoral votes than McCain did in 08.
He might even win.


8 posted on 07/24/2010 7:00:15 PM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
"Because it's his turn. Thats how the GOP picks it's candidate. It was Pappa Bush's turn, it was Bob Dole's turn and last time it was McCain's turn."

And that is the problem.

9 posted on 07/24/2010 7:09:47 PM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

She does have that wild hair, though I still see it as simply keeping her promise to John McCain to return the favor of having tapped her for the VP candidate in 2008. McCain is regional with limited impact, but any presidential candidate would have to be national. Romney would evince gagging and retching from coast to coast and there would be a nationally divisive cat fight in the GOP ranks. Not even Sarah is up for that kind of brinksmanship, methinks.


10 posted on 07/24/2010 7:11:34 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Most of us asked the same question about McCain. The Republican Party keeps foisting these losers on us (well, that and stupid open primaries).


11 posted on 07/24/2010 7:14:55 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The rats have the answer in the federal health care bill: price controls, rationing, global budgets, single payer, and many restrictions on private health care outside of the rat health care regime. The health care bill provides federal authority to impose price controls on state insurers. We have just seen the beginning of the skirmish. When the smoke clears, private insurance and much of private medicine will be finished. The only remaining insurers will be effectively government controlled.


12 posted on 07/24/2010 7:21:23 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
When will you people get off the Sarah bashing?...Sarah Palin isn't the problem...

FRIGG'N DIMWITS!

13 posted on 07/24/2010 7:22:47 PM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

One of my favorite parts of Obamacare is admission to medical school based upon race and sex, not grades or aptitude. I’ve heard that the late Michael Jackson’s doctor was an affirmative admissions guy who would have flunked out but didn’t because of special rules. Also heard he needed special help to pass his boards. Well, that quality is now coming for all of us.


14 posted on 07/24/2010 7:29:41 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

That was their plan all along.


15 posted on 07/24/2010 8:29:42 PM PDT by Sunbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
"Because it's his turn. Thats how the GOP picks it's candidate. It was Pappa Bush's turn, it was Bob Dole's turn and last time it was McCain's turn."

No disrespect is meant to you personally, so please don't take offense, but I have to say that that is a really s*itty reason for doing anything - that is the sort of idiocy that unions engage in, and socialists - it's not the sort of thing that a party that is ostensibly based on the premise of merit should be engaging in.

We can all see just how devastated our public schools and manufacturers have become, in significant part because of the union-required seniority rules, which is just a polite way of saying "it's your turn," so why on Earth would a free-market, meritocratic political organization want to flirt with that sort of self-destructive behaviour?
16 posted on 07/24/2010 8:58:03 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

For the whole series of Zero dollar bills, go here:

"Flickr Archive of Zero Bills"

17 posted on 07/24/2010 9:02:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

Hey, I don’t support it, I’m just stating how it’s been done. It’s the idiotic reason the GOP couldn’t beat a wounded Clinton and got creamed by Obama. And if they do it again it will be why the GOP goes down in 2012.


18 posted on 07/24/2010 9:04:37 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

I know you don’t support it - I’m sorry if I didn’t make that clear.


19 posted on 07/24/2010 9:10:09 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Well LL, I never bashed Sarah - I don’t think that she can win but I would vote for her in a second.


20 posted on 07/25/2010 6:51:16 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson