Skip to comments.
[Lake Tahoe] Property rights wrangling could spark Supreme Court's interest
Tahoe Daily Tribune ^
| August 14, 2010
| Kim DeVincenzi
Posted on 08/16/2010 5:13:38 PM PDT by WilliamIII
Can a court turn private property into public property by arbitrary order, without a penny paid to the landowners?
(Excerpt) Read more at tahoedailytribune.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: laketahoe; propertyrights; tahoe
To: WilliamIII
“Can a court turn private property into public property by arbitrary order, without a penny paid to the landowners”?Does Zer0 own GM?
2
posted on
08/16/2010 5:18:16 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: WilliamIII
"Can a court turn private property into public property by arbitrary order, without a penny paid to the landowners"?
Does Zer0 own GM?
3
posted on
08/16/2010 5:18:34 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: WilliamIII
Maybe they can undo the outrageous precedent of the Kelo case in Connecticut - before Obama gets to pack the court with another Marxist.
To: WilliamIII
“Redefining people's property rights out of existence.” (Lake) Tahoe private beaches aren't private anymore. If bureaucrats now insist on enforcing that judicial decree, look for a lawsuit ... don't be surprised if the state loses — and the state's highest court is declared in violation of the nation's highest law. Unless I am missing something here would this also not include ocean beaches in California?
5
posted on
08/16/2010 5:32:45 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(Even Hitler had Government run health care, but at least he got the Olympics for Germany)
To: WilliamIII
It’s Lake Tahoe. The Keep it Blue Nazis.
6
posted on
08/16/2010 5:37:56 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: Wife of D28Man
Maybe they can undo the outrageous precedent of the Kelo case in Connecticut - before Obama gets to pack the court with another Marxist.There is no need to. The lot is empty and slated to stay that way. Nothing is planned for it since the company that won it isn't expanding.
Kelo was all for nothing.
7
posted on
08/16/2010 5:58:42 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: Vendome
It’s Lake Tahoe. The Keep it Blue Nazis.I love the hypocrisy of that bumper sticker--they live, work, and play at the lake yet it's my job to keep it pristine.
8
posted on
08/16/2010 7:06:00 PM PDT
by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: raybbr
Kelo was all for nothing.
Didn't Kelo have to surrender his property??
To: RushingWater
The City eventually agreed to move Kelo’s house to a new location and to pay substantial additional compensation to other homeowners. The redeveloper was unable to obtain financing and had to abandon the redevelopment project, leaving the land as an empty lot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
10
posted on
08/16/2010 8:11:42 PM PDT
by
packrat35
(I got your tag line..)
To: RushingWater
Didn't Kelo have to surrender his property??Yes, she did. The lot remains empty today, though. That's why it turned out to be a complete waste.
11
posted on
08/17/2010 4:38:00 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson