Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Greta comments on the following piece:

Iran sanctions challenge South Korea to balance interests

By Chico Harlan

Washington Post Foreign Service

Friday, August 20, 2010

SEOUL -- South Korea, a nation that prides itself on its adaptive economy and its tight alliance with the United States, has come under pressure from the Obama administration to sacrifice the first for the sake of the second by signing on to stringent new sanctions against Iran. After much dithering, Seoul learned this week that it is running out of time to respond.

snip... snip... snip...

Link to WAPO story

1 posted on 08/20/2010 10:36:40 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric

Maybe they know better that to trust Zer0 or get into any deals with him? I know I wouldn’t work with him, and I can’t blsme any country that doesn’t want to deal with the backslider...


2 posted on 08/20/2010 10:38:24 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

BTW, Greta had Bolton on tonight’s show discussing SK’s reaction to the sanctions. Neither were pleased.


3 posted on 08/20/2010 10:38:51 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

I say FTW....

Our friends won’t help us... our Dear Reader has defacated all over our traditional allies, and our enemies are emboldened.

Time for some early-1900s isolationism.


6 posted on 08/20/2010 10:59:45 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

To be fair, Obama has snubbed SK at every turn.


9 posted on 08/20/2010 11:21:30 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

Another crummy left wing “ally”.

We should just let the North have them.


11 posted on 08/20/2010 11:27:52 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

South Korea has two motives: commercial gain; and using Iran as a precedent to develop nuclear weapons. With US power and credibility on the wane, South Korea must increasingly look to its own resources and strength as a counter against menaces from North Korea and China.


14 posted on 08/21/2010 12:13:20 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

Ahhhhh globalism!!! Free trade!!!

How wonderful!! (sarcasm)

The lesson behind this should be [pretty clear.
FORGET about the altruistic spread of Democracy to lower class nations whose populations can’t possibly appreciate our sacrifices and efforts

Only get involved in quick blitzkrieg like wars which utterly crush an opponent overnight.

Don’t waste resources and efforts at “nation-building” - they’ll only kick you in the butt long-term.

Avoid costly long term commitments which waste American lives and money

Only get involved in a conflict where our best interests are DIRECTLY at stake.


15 posted on 08/21/2010 12:43:42 AM PDT by ZULU (God, guts and guns made America great,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric
Question: What has the (Obama) policy toward Iran and North Korea done except give them more time to advance their nuclear ambitions?

Obama Stumped when asked question about North Korea

If you can stomach more Obama-speak (We...We...We...), listen to the entire thing. Very revealing. Obama blabbers on, while NK and Iran strengthen their nuclear capabilities. (This video was made several months ago. Look at how far they [Iran and NK] have advanced while "we" stand passively by.)

18 posted on 08/21/2010 2:27:26 AM PDT by Jess Kitting (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

Loyalty may very well become a forgotten commodity should the world economy continue to worsen and we are not well positioned to weather that particular storm since we owe so much to China.


19 posted on 08/21/2010 3:37:34 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

My theory is that Hussein really doesn’t CARE if Iran gets nukes. He has signaled as much by his inaction, snubbing of Israel, and by continued talk of “sanctions”. Idiocy.

So South Korea may reject Hussein because they also see this truth OR they may have gotten an “under the table” green light from Hussein to go ahead and ignore public overtures.


20 posted on 08/21/2010 3:55:52 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

As much as I despise Jimmy Carter, he was right on one thing - pull the troops from SK.

Should have happened in 1976 - would have saved us billions....


21 posted on 08/21/2010 9:55:24 AM PDT by ASOC (That is not sweat - I am melting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
The Republic of Korea, under verbal attack by a leftist stooge / blowhard / demagogue / partisan media shill? How outlandish....not least because Korea must be aware that the U.S. (at least, under Obama) will not do a freakin' thing to stop the illegal Pyongyang regime from doing whatever it wants.
22 posted on 08/21/2010 12:57:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("The bad jazz a cat blows wails long after he's cut out." -- Lord Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson