Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press Release: Three-Star General Files Sworn Affidavit Supporting LTC Lakin’s Case
safeguardourconstitution.com ^ | August 31, 2010

Posted on 08/31/2010 9:48:24 PM PDT by Man50D

Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney has supplied an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin, who faces trial on October 13-15. The retired Air Force three-star is the highest ranking officer yet to lend public support to LTC Lakin. His affidavit acknowledges widespread concerns over the President's Constitutional eligibility and demands the President release his birth records or the court authorize discovery.

McInerney’s sworn affidavit was filed in Court-Martial in support of Lakin’s motions for subpoenas for all of the president’s school records, and for a deposition of the custodian of Obama’s birth records in the possession of the State of Hawaii. The Judge has set a hearing in the Court Martial on these motions for this coming Thursday, September 2nd at 11:00 at Ft. Meade, Maryland. All court proceedings are open to the public. The courthouse is located within Ft. Meade at 4432 Llewellyn Avenue, which is on the corner of Llewellyn and Ernie Pyle Road. At the first intersection after the Reece Road gate, you should turn left on to Ernie Pyle Road. The courthouse is approximately 1 mile south of the intersection of Reece Road and Ernie Pyle Road.

LTC Lakin is a physician, and is in his 18th year of service in the Army. He is Board Certified in Family Medicine and Occupational and Environmental Medicine. He has been recognized for his outstanding service as a flight surgeon for year-long tours in Honduras, Bosnia and Afghanistan. He was also awarded the Bronze Star for his service in Afghanistan and recognized in 2005 as one of the Army Medical Department’s outstanding flight surgeons. In March of this year, he announced in a video posted on YouTube that he would refuse to obey orders until receiving proof of the President’s eligibility.

(Excerpt) Read more at safeguardourconstitution.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; fraud; lakin; ltgeneralmcinerney; mcinerney; military; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nohonesty; nointegrity; notransparency; notruth; obama; terrylakin; thomasmcinerney; usaf; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: Pilsner
You're full of nothing but straw this morning, scarecrow.

Let's cut to the quick.

Is Barack Obama an Article II natural born citizen and thus qualified to sit in the Oval Office???

81 posted on 09/01/2010 10:51:19 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
It is disgusting that the young men and women being asked to risk their lives for their country don't know if the person responsible for putting them in harm's way has the authority to do so.
82 posted on 09/01/2010 10:54:43 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Munz
I think Pilsner and others need to read the Affidavit of testimony from the General, in its entirety.

It is utterly devastating to Team Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obamma- Dunham.

The General has been the Convening Authority in many Courts Marshal, and he demands discovery for Lakin. Trust me, this affidavit is rattling the china in the Soebarkah White House.

83 posted on 09/01/2010 10:58:35 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
If Soebarkah is holding back a legitimate birth certificate with no issues, just to screw with the legal system and open multiple lawsuits, I think this would qualify a High Crime and Misdemeanor as it would be a clear abuse of the Judicial system and our national defense resources at time of war.

Think about it. If he could end all of this by telling Hawaii to open the files, it would be over. Instead, has had Judge after Judge looking at this, all over the country, working on these law suits. This is an abuse of the system. An abuse of the Presidential powers.

Impeachment should follow this trial, regardless of outcome.
This is worse than Watergate. Ten times worse.

84 posted on 09/01/2010 11:27:51 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

“Impeachment should follow this trial, regardless of outcome.”

You can’t impeach a usurper.


85 posted on 09/01/2010 11:43:20 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Trust me, this affidavit is rattling the china in the Soebarkah White House.

Yep --

86 posted on 09/01/2010 11:43:36 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Yes!!


87 posted on 09/01/2010 12:58:39 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

Yeah, whatever.

The Constitution was a contract once between the People of the United States and the Government of the United States. In that contract it states the President must meet a citizenship requirement. He has not provided supporting documents. This whole ‘Standing’ issue is a whole lot of BS.


88 posted on 09/01/2010 4:04:15 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
"In that contract it states the President must meet a citizenship requirement. He has not provided supporting documents."

Nor has any other President.

The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it?

89 posted on 09/01/2010 4:27:55 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
"If Soebarkah is holding back a legitimate birth certificate with no issues, just to screw with the legal system and open multiple lawsuits..."

He hasn't opened any lawsuits.

90 posted on 09/01/2010 4:29:07 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Even if “Barack Obama” was born in Hawaii, what proof is there that the occupant of the White House is that person? The occupant of the White House spent more time overseas than in the United States. How do we “know” who he is?


91 posted on 09/01/2010 4:35:25 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1; oneprojectusa; Woebama; Maggiegoo; seekthetruth; springloans; spunky lady; ...

Florida freeper ping!


92 posted on 09/01/2010 9:07:44 PM PDT by seekthetruth (Dan Fanelli US House FL 8 --- Allen West US House FL 22 --- Marco Rubio - US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

This would be wonderful if it happened. Let’s hope!


93 posted on 09/01/2010 9:48:01 PM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mlo
" The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it? "

You make it sound like he does meet the requirement.
You go on and say that the constitution does not demand or require supporting documents as if the Constitution is the only piece of evidence that anyone born in the USA has to prove that they were born in the USA..... it simply does not work that way.
Most of us have to show documents whether we are applying for a passport, job, bank accounts, so on and so on, and we don't show the US Constitution, how stupid do you think we are ?
A legitimate birth certificate is one of THE, if not, the only way to prove who you are, where you where born, and what date you were born.
Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !
You know very well how most people have to prove who they are, and where they are born.
94 posted on 09/01/2010 9:58:38 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Add this, too.

95 posted on 09/02/2010 12:10:21 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I don't need a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

He meens the brass should have spoken up earlier, not rely on JAG. Its obvious only the courts can remove a usurper through the DC Quo Warranto process.

Its always been about the officer oath.


96 posted on 09/02/2010 12:29:47 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents. Apparently neither does any law. He is required to meet the requirement, he isn't required to produce documents. Where is your proof that he doesn't meet it?"

Barack Hussein Obama admits that his father was a foreign national. Natural-born citizenship, as defined by the founding fathers, requires that both parents be citizens to confer such status.

97 posted on 09/02/2010 2:46:07 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

Especially after putting his life on the line and dedicated 18 years of service to this country...


98 posted on 09/02/2010 4:06:14 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
"Stop giving us the straw man argument that the US Constitution does not require anyone to produce documents of their eligibility of they were running for president, that is a load of liberal CRAP !"

It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one.

You can't, because it's never happened. That's the point. There is no requirement for such a thing. The fact that Obama hasn't complied with a non-existant requirement means nothing.

99 posted on 09/02/2010 6:53:10 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
"Barack Hussein Obama admits that his father was a foreign national. Natural-born citizenship, as defined by the founding fathers, requires that both parents be citizens to confer such status."

This has nothing to do with the point being made. However I'll respond anyway. You are wrong. That is not what natural born citizen means, or meant then. That's a birther rewriting of history and the constitution.

100 posted on 09/02/2010 6:54:59 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson