Posted on 09/20/2010 4:53:27 AM PDT by marktwain
“Republicans: Enlist, but Avoid Speeches on the Constitution.” That’s the way the headline writer for the New York Times encapsulated the advice of one of its reporters, Kate Zernike, in a dispatch over the weekend. “The trick,” she writes, “is to take advantage of the Tea Party passion and stay away from its extremes. Celebrate the genius of the Constitution, but don’t get into the particulars.”
Ms. Zernike goes on to quote the political sage Stuart Rothenberg as saying he reckons it’s “very clear” that “what’s best for the election” is to focus on President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, health care, and the deficit. “You see these rallies and the signs are all about the Constitution,” Ms. Zernike quotes him as saying. “They want it to be about these big ideological ideas, when I don’t think most voters think that way.”
Hmmmm. Our own view is that Ms. Zernike and Mr. Rothenberg are selling the voters short. We don’t belittle their own credentials. Ms. Zernike is the author of a new book on the Tea Party, “Boiling Mad,” which is well up on the Amazon.com list. Mr. Rothenberg is the publisher of a non-partisan political report. But everywhere we’ve gone lately where the conversation or the speeches turn to the Constitution, the place lights right up.
The idea that the constitutional principles are beyond the ken of the American people strikes us as not only condescending but inaccurate. The history of constitutional law is a long oeuvre of cases that were brought by citizens with no special training in the law, and more often than not no fame or special stature. rged from Philadelphia that summer of 1787. Today all over the country, people are looking to the constitution and talking about it.
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
They’d much rather people enjoy American Idol. Weasels. All of ‘em. “Here, take this. Don’t worry, you just doze, and we’ll take care of things for you.” Like I said, weasels.
Have you seen this dog???? Yeech!, as Alfred E. Neuman would say!
The communist progressives think that most ordinary Americans aren’t intelligent enough to understand “the particulars”.
Keep it up, NYT.
>>“The trick,” she writes, “is to take advantage of the Tea Party passion and stay away from its extremes. Celebrate the genius of the Constitution, but don’t get into the particulars.” <<
Translation: Joe Six-pack is too stupid to understand that “Constitution” thingy. Only us liberal elites are intelligent to understand it enough to despise it. Stick to guns and butter.
Because they are such and inconvenient truth to the socialists and fascists who want to take over America. H*** no! We are taking America back from the socialists, anti-liberty, anti-freedom, big-government, nanny-state {expletives} one election at a time. We are hung up on The Constitution - it works. Socialism fails. End of story.
They want to make sure that even if the changes are broad in this election they won’t be very deep, so they can easily be brushed aside in 2012. Anger is temporary but deeper philosophical shifts in people’s opinion of what government should be last far longer. People still measure themselves relative to Reagan while Clinton’s beliefs have been largely forgotten.
The Democrat attack machine is in full force. This tells me they are very worried that the majority of America is not only rejecting the “Progressive agenda” but taking steps to halt it altogether.
Article conclusion. Spot on!
So when the GOP is counseled not to get into these questions, we would say take that advice with a grain of salt. The rising stars on the right this season are crafting a whole movement around the phrase “constitutional conservativism.” That is the stock phrase being used at every stop by Sarah Palin. People like to belittle her learning. But she knows what she’s doing. She’s not trying to impose their religion or their social values. She, and others in her movement, are trying to restore the idea of constitutionalism, the idea that the Constitution through which the people granted power to the Congress also enumerated those powers, so as to limit them, and laid down on the Congress certain prohibitions, most famously the Bill of Rights but also Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution. Those who have taken their focus off these principles are the ones who are in trouble today. The ones who are making speeches about them are prospering. The advice to avoid the Constitution is advice from a quarter that doesn’t wish them success.
“...when I don’t think most voters think that way.”
when does anyone from the NYT every meet normal people? NYC kook only sees NYC kooks and thinks NYC kooks at the NYT are NORMAL?
The particulars of the Constitution are extreme? It’s the particulars of the Constitution that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have been violating ever since Obama was nominated when Pelosi sent out the form that excluded the part that said Obama was qualified under the Constitution to even be President.
We all know the constitution is too extreme for the democrats to behold. </arcasm> This is absurd. The constitution is the basis for all our laws. It is not something that changes with the whims of a politician.
Communist parrots party line. News at 10:00
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.