Posted on 10/03/2010 8:29:09 AM PDT by Rufus2007
You have to wonder what on earth ABC’s “This Week” host Christiane Amanpour is thinking by holding a so-called town hall meeting this close to a pivotal midterm election.
On the Oct. 3 broadcast of “This Week,” the brainiacs at ABC determined it would be appropriate to pitch Christian leaders again moderate and extremist Muslims. This choice of programming comes at a time when many conservatives have chastised for being outspoken over the placement of Islamic worship center near the Sept. 11 Ground Zero site.
However, perhaps the most alarming statement on Amanpour’s program came from Anjem Choudary, a former British solicitors and Muslim cleric that spokesman for the group Islam4UK. Choudary contends eventually you'll see global Islamic rule, including here in the United States.
...more (w/video)...
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
ABC = ANTI-American Broadcasting Company.
Amanpour is a card carrying Islamofascist. I can’t watch that shrill anti-american harridan for more than about 15 seconds before the retch reflex sets in. She needs to go back to the UK where she belongs.
As far as the flag of Islam flying over the USA. I don’t frickin think so Christiane. You see us pesky bitter Americans clinging to our AK 74’s and religion are not about to let that happen. No and Hell no!!
I caught part of this show. Towards the end, if you can stomach this, Daisy Khan (Imam Rauf’s wife) actually said, “I am fighting for American values” by erecting the mosque at Ground Zero. Like she and her husband are American heroes.
If people keep buying this doublespeak upside taqiya stuff we are seriously in deep, deep trouble.
And we’re going just sit by with how many H-bombs, missiles, nuke subs, and satellite weapons? Kill 6 or 7 hundred million of them get an unconditional surrender,,,oh I forgot, we gotta get them paid for first, and they are not allowed to be used to defend this Nation. P-ss on the taxpayers,,,suckers.
“Choudary contends eventually you’ll see global Islamic rule, including here in the United States. “
I’d rather detonate all our nukes in their silos (if we even have any left) than be under Islamic Rule.
They’re going to fly the French flag above the White House?
No problem. Obama is in the process of unilaterally reducing our nuclear weapons. He stopped the ABM shield. Plus, we haven’t built a new nuclear bomb since the early 1990’s while the Russian’s and Chinese have updated their weapons. Obama is putting us into a position where if in the 2020’s we are faced with a nuclear showdown our choice will be be unconditional surrender or obliteration. Our opponents will be sitting safely behind their state of the art anti missile shields not worrying about any of our 30 year old missiles and bombs getting through.
Imagine a Republican Congress daring to appropriate money to build new nuclear weapons. The leftists in the mainstream media, academia, and Congress will have a fit. That first assumes they will have the courage to bring the issue to the floor. How many of them are owned by the Chinese and Saudi’s?
You have to wonder what on earth ABC’s “This Week” host Christiane Amanpour is thinking by holding a so-called town hall meeting this close to a pivotal midterm election.You already have a problem if you use the words "thinking" and "ABC" in the same sentence.
Do you really think that the 10 of millions of Christians are going to stand by while Islam plants its flag on the WH. Has anyone heard of the Crusades? Christians are not about to bow down to Islam anytime soon.
I have posted this very thought all along. Think it through with me - the parallels are significant.
First, cancer cells are very similar to our own. You can't quite say they are not human cells, or “our very own cells.” They spring up from our own cells. They are genetically identical in almost every way.
But they have some odd, usual “thoughts” and “behaviors”. They multiply rapidly. They invade surrounding areas, and spread to distant areas to set up enclaves, pushing aside noncancerous cells and structures.
They use the body's own mechanisms and resources against it. They insert themselves into key structures and disable or destroy them. They overwhelm the body's natural defenses and immune system. The body cannot effectively wall them off, keep them in check, change their inherent nature and behavior, or “make peace” with them in any way. Ultimately, left unchecked, the natural history of cancer is to wreck havoc on the body, causing much suffering, and eventually death.
The only known cures are extreme, aggressive, destructive ones - radical cures: surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. There is always collateral damage, death of healthy cells, sometimes removal of entire functional tissues and organs.
But often enough there is improvement, either improved functioning and quality of life, or often a complete cure, which entails permanent and complete removal of all cancer cells from the body. Although not all cancer cells are always invading and destroying vital structures, it is important to aim for complete eradication of all cells as the goal of treatment, or the cancer will return with time.
In its essential points, this analogy seems hard to refute when applied to Islam. I see little reason not to draw the parallels, and I think they point to unfortunate, drastic, but necessary “cures.”
Freeper Kristinn has a thread running on this ABC show with the transcript of this amazing back and forth. Scary stuff.
It is easy to rip the ‘moderate’ mask off Muslim extremists, also known as the ‘Helen Thomas’.
Easy, they see it as a distraction...anything so the subject changes to something other than the economy, jobs, and supersized government.
There are some people upset about the economy and mismanagement in DC, who are more concerned about wearing religious tolerance on their sleeve than recognizing the threat the IDEOLOGY of islam poses to the West.
I think their mistake is this backfired, and many people's eyes were opened to the threat. The coalition of those concerned about our national security is very large too.
I'd rather detonate all our nukes on the Arab/Mulsim world. Lets start with Mecca, Medina, Tehran, Damascus, Riyad, Qom, Amman and Libya. Throw in Cairo too.
Either Amanpour is nuts, or she's working undercover for the Republican Party.
And remember who this stupid bitch is married to, Jamie Rubin.
Jeff Poor, if you’re reading this, you need to slow down and proofread before you hit “submit”. It’s a bit much to expect readers to translate or decode that many mistakes and typos.
I hope that idiot is on TV every day.
ABC / Diane Sawyer are ‘exploring Islam this coming week. I think for the whole week on ABC nightly news.
Not a single one of these women would reduce themselves to wearing a burka.
But they will sign up the rest of us in a hearbeat.
They can explore Islam all they want. But it won’t help one bit the people of other religions who are persecuted and killed by Islamics all over the World.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.