Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Lame Duck Threat to Bailout Union Pensions (401k threat)
Human Events ^ | 10/8/10

Posted on 10/13/2010 1:38:09 PM PDT by roses of sharon

Democrats in the Senate on Thursday held a recess hearing covering a taxpayer bailout of union pensions and a plan to seize private 401(k) plans to more "fairly" distribute taxpayer-funded pensions to everyone.

Sen. Harkin (D-Iowa), Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee heard from hand-picked witnesses advocating the infamous "Guaranteed Retirement Account" (GRA) authored by Theresa Guilarducci.

In a nutshell, under the GRA system government would seize private 401(k) accounts, setting up an additional 5% mandatory payroll tax to dole out a "fair" pension to everyone using that confiscated money coupled with the mandated contributions.

***

“We need a comprehensive solution that addresses interrelated problems. For example, a system that places most of the burden for retirement saving on individuals will always have to wrestle with the problem of pre-retirement loans and withdrawals (simply plugging these leaks will not work, because many workers would stop contributing to the system). A system that relies on tax incentives to promote individual retirement savings will necessarily tend to favor high-income workers who can afford to save more and who benefit the most from these tax breaks. Conversely, a truly universal system would need to shield low-income workers from out-of-pocket costs or wage cuts.

***

Brett McMahon, spokesman for the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), a trade association, warns this hearing exposed part of a process that may come as early as the November lame duck push to bailout union pensions by attaching the bailout to an across-the-board extension of the current tax rates.

"I am deeply concerned that they will try to attach something like the Casey bill or the Casey bill in and of itself to tax cut extensions bill that is inevitably going to have to be dealt with at some point during the lame duck session,"

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 111th; 401k; bailout; bho44; bustunions; congress; democratcongress; democratcorruption; democrats; economy; elections; fail; gra; liberalfascism; obama; pensions; redistribution; socialism; spreadthewealth; stealthewealth; taxcheatparty; taxes; unioncorruption; unionpensions; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: exit82
If we do not peacefully take back this country on November 2nd, it will be 1860 all over again.

I respectfully disagree. It won't be like 1860, it'll be more like 2006 Baghdad. There won't be secession. There will be a couple million thoroughly PO'd sharpshooters sniping at the thieving politicians.

21 posted on 10/13/2010 2:08:35 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. More @ www.book-resistancetotyranny.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

This county will experience a uprising like you have never seen. I have saved and invested for 30 years in my 401K. They will not steal it from me.

Get out of it now! The inflation they created will steal it.


22 posted on 10/13/2010 2:31:33 PM PDT by lookout88 (.combat officer's dad,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Democrats in the Senate on Thursday held a recess hearing covering a taxpayer bailout of union pensions and a plan to seize private 401(k) plans to more "fairly" distribute taxpayer-funded pensions to everyone.

Only in the fevered minds of totalitarians, career politicians, unproductive bureaucrats and the insane could 401(k) plans be redefined as "taxpayer funded."

For the progressives reading this, and other feebleminded, 401(k)s are funded entirely by the wage earner with employer matching modest percentages of the regular payday amount, only not so much lately.

I understand that politicians and other criminals believe that if they haven't collected taxes on these amounts they have helped to fund the account.
That is exactly the same as the burglar and the mugger claiming that by refraining from victimizing you, he is subsidizing your lifestyle, no matter how modest it may be. The only difference is the thin veneer of legality, passing a law first to make it "legal" in one instance, but not in the other. The definition of "public servant" has gone "1984"

Did i mention that these elected criminals at all level of government got their COLAs this year?

23 posted on 10/13/2010 2:33:47 PM PDT by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Tipping point.

The start of massive non-compliance at best, and all out war at worst.


24 posted on 10/13/2010 2:36:26 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
This couldn’t be constitutional

Of course, it’s not constitutional but when has this administration allowed the Constitution to be an impediment?

25 posted on 10/13/2010 2:37:47 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Banks in the Caymans and the Alps are smacking their lips...

It's all good and well to protest, rattle sabers and shout "from my cold dead hands", but the money's not in your hands, it's in the bank. No one from the gov't will show up at your door to steal your 401K. They'll get the banks to do it for them, and probably charge you a fee to do it as well. You may not even know about it until you try to draw some money out...

The only way to avoid confiscation is to take the substantial penalty and withdraw it now. That money has to go somewhere, and I figure a lot of it will go offshore.

26 posted on 10/13/2010 2:48:52 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Pull it out. Take the hit. Invest in precious metals


Republicans need to warn the voters RIGHT NOW about the massive sell off in the market that would be precipitated by this scheme to confiscate 401k’s.


27 posted on 10/13/2010 2:49:26 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

That is exactly the same as the burglar and the mugger claiming that by refraining from victimizing you, he is subsidizing your lifestyle, no matter how modest it may be.


Excellent analogy. Good post.


28 posted on 10/13/2010 2:51:46 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The Democrats have decided that everything is Constitutional until the courts say its not, and then they will pack the courts.

Unfortunately, that's the way our system was set up. The Supreme Court can not initiate action without a petitioner with standing (think ALL Republican members of the House and the Senate) requests it, and then only if they can prove that delaying action will cause irreperable harm.

It never occured to the Founders that the integrity of elected officials would deteriorate to the point that they would decide what the Constitution means, and get away with it. The SC must stand by helplessly.

Why the Republicans did not do that twenty months ago will fill a large future volume on Constitutional Law.

Assuming our Constitution survives without further perversions.

29 posted on 10/13/2010 2:55:55 PM PDT by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
They will not steal it from me.

The only way you can ensure this is if you liquidate it before they pull this. As long as your funds are parked in a 401k, you are powerless and there isn't a damn thing you can do to stop them from stealing it from you.

I'm so glad I liquidated my entire 401k last year. I sunk the entire amount into a huge downpayment on a reasonable, affordable house to give us a mortgage smaller than the car payments we had a few years ago. So if they want to steal my 401k, they'll have to physically come take me out of my house in a body bag.

30 posted on 10/13/2010 3:05:16 PM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lookout88

Get out of it now! The inflation they created will steal it

Sounds like they will create and blame it on inflation bail out the system and all of our pensions will be controlled by them.

How long do we sit?


31 posted on 10/13/2010 3:06:43 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (The tides coming in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

END ALL GOVERNMENT PENSIONS


BTW, federal employees have their own retirement savings accounts. The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) is a retirement savings and investment plan for Federal employees that was established in 1986. It offers the same types of savings and tax benefits that many private corporations offer their employees under 401(k) plans.

The TSP is a defined contribution plan, meaning that the retirement income received from a TSP account will depend on how much a federal employee (and the agency through matching contributions) put into an employee’s account during your working years and the earnings accumulated over that time.

For federal employees covereded by the current Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS), the TSP is one part of a three-part retirement package that also includes a FERS basic annuity and Social Security.

Tapping private 401k’s without also tapping the federal employee equivalent of 401k’s would seem to raise serious constitutional and/or political issues for the Democrats.


32 posted on 10/13/2010 3:16:49 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
The start of massive non-compliance at best, and all out war at worst.

Absolutely no need for an all out war - the number of enemy to be harshly dealt with would be the number of those legislators approving such a theft. I am guessing the number would be less than 300.

33 posted on 10/13/2010 3:24:01 PM PDT by USMA '71 ((Re-elect no one!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

How long do we sit?

You know what? I took out as big a loan as I could a week ago on my 401. Gold, silver, copper, lead, guns. food, Bought some uranium stock.


34 posted on 10/13/2010 4:06:01 PM PDT by lookout88 (.combat officer's dad,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

They’ve done this before when they started including FICA tax revenues in the general budget.


35 posted on 10/13/2010 4:09:49 PM PDT by hotshu (Keep America's Faith, that's all 0bama and his fellow traitors can't steal from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Ditto that! From my cold dead hands.


36 posted on 10/13/2010 4:16:56 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Ditto that! From my cold dead hands.


37 posted on 10/13/2010 4:16:59 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USMA '71
Absolutely no need for an all out war - the number of enemy to be harshly dealt with would be the number of those legislators approving such a theft. I am guessing the number would be less than 300.

I am guessing you are wrong. At a minimum it's a couple of thousand, to include Commissions, Czars and their staff, etc. The criminals can't exercise their power without triggermen.

Ever looked into the way vermin extermination works?

It's never bothered them before, but the bottom of the bureaucratic food chain of enforcers is NOT a job I would want to have for the next few years.

38 posted on 10/13/2010 4:20:09 PM PDT by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Rats in the private sector have 401k’s too. This is a total winning issue for republicans.


39 posted on 10/13/2010 4:26:23 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Yep, if they are trying to start another civil war this would do the trick. I wonder what the government would do if everyone withdrew all their funds from their 401K? Would they send the IRS goons to all citizens front doors demanding the money. Only in a Democrats mind is this even considered.


40 posted on 10/13/2010 4:56:45 PM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson