Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memo To Nancy Pelosi From Cindy Sheehan (Cindy endorses Republican opponent)
MichaelMoore.com ^ | October 14, 2010 | Cindy Sheehan

Posted on 10/24/2010 2:43:26 AM PDT by tlb

Open Memo

To: Nancy Pelosi

From Cindy Sheehan

Hey Nan,

How's that "liberal agenda" going for you these days?

You have had quite a run as the first female Speaker of the House, haven't you?

In that almost four years now, you have fully funded the wars; rammed through the bankster bailouts and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Modernization Act; refused to hold the criminals of the Bush administration accountable; supported the torture policies of George Bush and wanted even stricter measures against suspected terrorists; obediently supported and defended the murderous Israeli oppression of Palestine; presided over the worst jobs' hemorrhage since the Great Depression (can you see all the jobless and homeless from your mansion on the hill in Pac Heights?) and the only "victory" that you can claim is a feeble health care "reform" bill that you admit you had no idea what it contained, when in reality, it was just a massive welfare program for your corporate buddies in the industry.

You are going to become a lame duck Speaker early next month when your party loses its majority--now don't think I am thrilled that the Republicans are returning to a majority, at least in your House, because I think your party and the GOP are just different sides of the same coin--but you can't say I didn't warn you back in 2006 that if you and your party didn't end the wars and hold BushCo accountable that your euphoria would be short-lived.

I literally brought that warning home to you in 2008 when I stood for election against you as an Independent in your district. I again tried to send you the gift of a wake up call through my platform and candidacy that ending the wars;, increasing jobs here in the US; fully funding education; protecting people's homes from eviction and foreclosure; protecting the environment from destruction; and justice for war crimes were what the people wanted.

Nancy, your party's impending defeat proves that if you ever were in touch with "the people," that time passed long before you assumed the Speaker's gavel and when you relinquish the gavel, you will be just another empty lavender pants suit--an obscenely expensive lavender pants suit, but empty all the same.

So you can't say that I didn't warn you and your colleagues that the people shouldn't be ignored. I now realize that the warning fell on deaf ears and was futile, but also that the political game your party and the other party play are far more important to you than the people of this world are, anyway.

With the elections rapidly approaching on November 2, you once again are up for re-election yourself and the people of San Francisco will dutifully obey their Democratic impulses and send you back to DC one more time, no matter how atrocious you have been, ( The question of the day, though, Nan, is when you lose your Speakership will you resign your seat? Hey, I know! Maybe you and your good buddy, George Bush, can have play dates in your mutual retirements ?) but you do have opponents.

I know of two for sure, the firmly antiwar Republican, John Dennis and the firmly antiwar and anti-Capitalist Peace and Freedom Candidate Gloria La Riva.

My good friend, SF politico and former VP Candidate, Matt Gonzalez, has endorsed John Dennis because, as is your custom, you gutlessly refused to debate him. I am also encouraging you (once again, futilely) to not only debate John Dennis, but Gloria La Riva, too.

I like and admire both John and Gloria and support them as human beings who both have the two things that you lack but would have made you a much better person: courage and integrity.

As someone who got a kick in the teeth from the political school of elitism two years ago, I can't endorse anyone for Federal elections which I believe are only a huge sham and scandal at any rate, but I am convinced that either John or Gloria would represent district 8 in California far better than you have on your best day.

I did warn you many times and I would childishly like to say: "I told ya so," but there is so much at stake here on proverbial Main Street that I don't feel like your defeat is going to be a victory (frankly, your party's unlikely victory would also be a defeat for Main Street) for anybody except the non-partisan ruling class that pulls the levers to propagate their agenda and pad their bank accounts at our expense.

In never-ending struggle against everything you represent,

Cindy Sheehan


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2010; endorsement; johndennis; kissofdeath; pelosi; sanfrancisco; sheehan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Curiously I haven't seen much focus on this by the national media.
1 posted on 10/24/2010 2:43:33 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

The reason is this Republican brings new meaning to the term “RINO”. He’s for the Bush tax cuts and a few other things, but he’s also pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion, and against the WOT.


2 posted on 10/24/2010 2:46:52 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-abortion atheist, conservative Bostonian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Whole lot of mental conditions in that screed.


3 posted on 10/24/2010 2:48:22 AM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

And there never will be.


4 posted on 10/24/2010 2:48:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Rest easy, you won’t.


5 posted on 10/24/2010 2:49:14 AM PDT by tommyboy (We'll do it live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

John Dennis is a Libertarian across the board, both the good and the bad aspects. Still, it would be a giant leap in the right direction for San Francisco if they replaced Nanzi Pelousy with him.


6 posted on 10/24/2010 2:54:54 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Yeah, I should have phrased that post differently. Because he’s not a Republican except in name, there’s really no reason for the Republicans to talk about him—he doesn’t represent the brand they’re trying to push.

I agree he’d be an improvement. I just have rarely seen Libertarian views given equal time on networks or in newspapers, and if the RNC isn’t pushing him, which is different from simply attacking her, there’s no real incentive for much coverage.


7 posted on 10/24/2010 2:58:43 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-abortion atheist, conservative Bostonian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Because he’s not a Republican except in name, there’s really no reason for the Republicans to talk about him
They sure talked about Mike Castle, Mark Kirk, and Liza Smearcowsky a lot.
 
8 posted on 10/24/2010 3:04:38 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Well, hopefully we can change that...


9 posted on 10/24/2010 3:05:28 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-abortion atheist, conservative Bostonian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tlb

as dumb as a piece of wood.


10 posted on 10/24/2010 3:15:03 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Oh well...There’s 13 votes Pelosi won’t get.


11 posted on 10/24/2010 3:16:30 AM PDT by DGHoodini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Unfortunately, too many folks on our side won’t try to work for a strategic victory. Dennis would be a strategic victory. Is he conservative? Nope. But he’s libertarian and far better on his worst day than Nancy Pelosi is on her best.

This district is as far to the kooky left as you can get and will never elect a conservative. Period. But if they would elect someone who is conservative every now and then, it would be a marked improvement.


12 posted on 10/24/2010 3:49:59 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics, and victors study demographics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

FYI Ping


13 posted on 10/24/2010 3:56:57 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
If I was the Republican candidate, the last person I would want is Cindy Sheehan’s endorsement....what an embarrassment to him. She is still a wacko and hope every FREEPER sees this and not start being her cheerleader.
14 posted on 10/24/2010 5:09:30 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

If Nancy Pelosi does lose re-election to Congress (And Good Luck with that, actually, happening!), then that would be awesome.


15 posted on 10/24/2010 5:11:02 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“If I was the Republican candidate, the last person I would want is Cindy Sheehan’s endorsement....what an embarrassment to him. She is still a wacko and hope every FREEPER sees this and not start being her cheerleader.”

Indeed. The Rats and Rat-controlled media got deeply in bed with this psycho when she first emerged from her hole, and boy have they come to regret that!

So let me see if I can comprehend what’s going on here. Cindy Sheehan (herein referred to as Far-Left Whackjob One) makes a post on Micheal Moore’s web site (herein referred to as Far-Left Whackjob Two) that attacks the far left for not being far left enough, and as a consequence advocates endorsing Nanci Pelosi’s not-really-a-Republican Republican, and we who are Right are supposed to believe that Far-Left Whackjob One is now on our side?

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA!


16 posted on 10/24/2010 5:29:45 AM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tlb

You know, on second thought why are we even wasting time watching far-leftists throwing sand at each other in their little far-leftist sandbox? I mean really. Isn’t this what we did in college? You know, ingesting one form or another of a consciousnesses altering substance and then proceeding to debate profound philosophical questions like how many far-leftists can dance on the head of a pin?


17 posted on 10/24/2010 5:33:05 AM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Unfortunately, too many folks on our side won’t try to work for a strategic victory. Dennis would be a strategic victory. Is he conservative? Nope. But he’s libertarian and far better on his worst day than Nancy Pelosi is on her best.

This district is as far to the kooky left as you can get and will never elect a conservative. Period. But if they would elect someone who is conservative every now and then, it would be a marked improvement.


Problem is...you endorse liberalism

For the GOP to return to its real conservative roots, it must never support a candidate to “Merely win the seat for the GOP”....this is how the GOP has so many RINOs


18 posted on 10/24/2010 5:47:23 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (They don't let you build churches in Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Yawn ,,,,,,


19 posted on 10/24/2010 5:51:29 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ GLENN BECK is 0bama's TRANSPARENCY CZAR }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Rome, you said it all. ‘mental conditions in that screed.’

Thanks for the laugh.


20 posted on 10/24/2010 6:17:57 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson