Posted on 10/24/2010 2:43:26 AM PDT by tlb
The reason is this Republican brings new meaning to the term “RINO”. He’s for the Bush tax cuts and a few other things, but he’s also pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion, and against the WOT.
Whole lot of mental conditions in that screed.
And there never will be.
Rest easy, you won’t.
John Dennis is a Libertarian across the board, both the good and the bad aspects. Still, it would be a giant leap in the right direction for San Francisco if they replaced Nanzi Pelousy with him.
Yeah, I should have phrased that post differently. Because he’s not a Republican except in name, there’s really no reason for the Republicans to talk about him—he doesn’t represent the brand they’re trying to push.
I agree he’d be an improvement. I just have rarely seen Libertarian views given equal time on networks or in newspapers, and if the RNC isn’t pushing him, which is different from simply attacking her, there’s no real incentive for much coverage.
Because hes not a Republican except in name, theres really no reason for the Republicans to talk about himThey sure talked about Mike Castle, Mark Kirk, and Liza Smearcowsky a lot.
Well, hopefully we can change that...
as dumb as a piece of wood.
Oh well...There’s 13 votes Pelosi won’t get.
Unfortunately, too many folks on our side won’t try to work for a strategic victory. Dennis would be a strategic victory. Is he conservative? Nope. But he’s libertarian and far better on his worst day than Nancy Pelosi is on her best.
This district is as far to the kooky left as you can get and will never elect a conservative. Period. But if they would elect someone who is conservative every now and then, it would be a marked improvement.
FYI Ping
If Nancy Pelosi does lose re-election to Congress (And Good Luck with that, actually, happening!), then that would be awesome.
“If I was the Republican candidate, the last person I would want is Cindy Sheehans endorsement....what an embarrassment to him. She is still a wacko and hope every FREEPER sees this and not start being her cheerleader.”
Indeed. The Rats and Rat-controlled media got deeply in bed with this psycho when she first emerged from her hole, and boy have they come to regret that!
So let me see if I can comprehend what’s going on here. Cindy Sheehan (herein referred to as Far-Left Whackjob One) makes a post on Micheal Moore’s web site (herein referred to as Far-Left Whackjob Two) that attacks the far left for not being far left enough, and as a consequence advocates endorsing Nanci Pelosi’s not-really-a-Republican Republican, and we who are Right are supposed to believe that Far-Left Whackjob One is now on our side?
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA!
You know, on second thought why are we even wasting time watching far-leftists throwing sand at each other in their little far-leftist sandbox? I mean really. Isn’t this what we did in college? You know, ingesting one form or another of a consciousnesses altering substance and then proceeding to debate profound philosophical questions like how many far-leftists can dance on the head of a pin?
Unfortunately, too many folks on our side wont try to work for a strategic victory. Dennis would be a strategic victory. Is he conservative? Nope. But hes libertarian and far better on his worst day than Nancy Pelosi is on her best.
This district is as far to the kooky left as you can get and will never elect a conservative. Period. But if they would elect someone who is conservative every now and then, it would be a marked improvement.
For the GOP to return to its real conservative roots, it must never support a candidate to “Merely win the seat for the GOP”....this is how the GOP has so many RINOs
Yawn ,,,,,,
Rome, you said it all. ‘mental conditions in that screed.’
Thanks for the laugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.