Skip to comments.
Andrew Cuomo and Corruption
American Thinker ^
| October 25, 2010
| Peter Landesman
Posted on 10/25/2010 10:21:30 PM PDT by neverdem
In this campaign season of lies and distortions, Andrew Cuomo the New York State Attorney General and Democratic candidate for governor last week issued one of the most preposterous statements ever:
"I understand that the people of the state are frustrated. I'm frustrated. I'm angry. Nobody knows Albany corruption better than I do. I've been staring at the beast for three years."
What has he been doing during the last 4 years? One would think that he, as Attorney General of New York State, has been in a better position to curtail corruption than he would be as Governor.
Instead Cuomo has focused the resources of his state office to bring suits against high profile national corporations
, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs. If these cases were not in the national spotlight, he would have let the Securities and Exchange Commission complete their investigation by themselves.
However, one case against an individual criminal, the former state comptroller Democrat Alan Hevesi, has been successful. For this the Republican Candidate for Governor Carl Palidino, graciously commends him. But Palidino criticizes Cuomo for a pattern of letting other influential Democrats "off the hook". He adds
"How can the failed chief prosecutor of the most corrupt state government in America believe he should be Governor? The people of New York hired Andrew to shine a light on Albany's rats and he failed."
For a list of cronies Cuomo did not prosecute see this article
by Maggie Haberman.
In fact, the Hevesi case, while certainly a praiseworthy pursuit, was forced
upon Cuomo by others
. In his 2006 re-election campaign, Hevesi's opponent Chris Callaghan alerted the public to the fact that Hevesi has been wrongfully using a state employee as a chauffeur. The charge was substantiated by the State Ethics Commission and developed into what has been called the "Chauffeur-gate" case. Would Cuomo's office have prosecuted a Democrat unless he was forced to follow through with an investigation started by others?
The most salient example of a case Cuomo did not prosecute is described in the article
"Andrew Cuomo's $2 Million Man: How the Attorney General wannabe turned an accused slumlord into a sugar daddy" by Altman and Lozano in The Village Voice (2006). As the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Cuomo authorized the filing of a civil suit by the U.S. Justice Department against Andrew Farkas's housing companies for maintaining poor housing conditions and kickbacks. But before the case could be finished, Cuomo negotiated a settlement for a minimal fine. This allowed Farkas to sell his property for a profitable 910 million dollars. After resigning from the federal government, Cuomo was rewarded by Farkas with $1,200,000 consulting fee and $800,000 in political contributions.
If Cuomo maintains this pattern of going soft on prosecution in order to reap financial rewards when he switches office, how much money could he make as Governor and how much worse would the financial condition of New York State become?
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
posted on 10/25/2010 10:21:31 PM PDT
“Cuomo was rewarded by Farkas with $1,200,000 consulting fee”
wow. 1.2 million dollars for “consulting.” Hard to believe that this crook is even nominated for Governor. You’d think that after his incompetence at HUD contributed to the housing market collapse he would have been permanently prohibited from running for any public office.
Andy Cuomo = Eliot Spitzer II: Electric Boogaloo
posted on 10/25/2010 10:29:47 PM PDT
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
Any coincidence a majority of residents of Chicago and New York seem to prefer their political candidates to be corrupt? Perhaps they like movie portrayals of graft, corruption and vice filmed right where they live? IMHO only when candidates are elected that have no “families” background will it appear those living there truly care about the nation and the problems it is facing as a result of consistently electing “corrupt politicians.”
posted on 10/25/2010 10:34:36 PM PDT
(who runs the gop?)
His assertion gives himself away as I am sure nobody knows Albany corruption better then he does. Another Eliot Spitzer in the making I think.
The people of New York, NY and Chicago, Ill are as corrupt as the goverments they elect..
-OR- they would elect honest ones.. same in Mexifornia..
posted on 10/25/2010 11:11:43 PM PDT
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
Yep, I was just thinking to myself that Cuomo is just a rerun of Spitzer. Unfortunately, I think he’ll also be the next governor of NY.
posted on 10/26/2010 8:37:48 AM PDT
by Major Matt Mason
(I know more about Christine O'Donnell than I do about Barack Obama.)
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson