Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New GOP senator could vote with Democrats on campaign finance bill (Mark Kirk-IL)
The Hill ^ | 11-8-10 | Susan Crabtree

Posted on 11/08/2010 1:35:26 PM PST by Justaham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Justaham

Those geniuses who think a Sen. Elect Castle would be different, please speak up.


21 posted on 11/08/2010 2:08:21 PM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
I'm glad Kirk won just to rub it in the Dems noses that they lost 0's seat, and since the guy he was running against was a mob-connected thief we didn't lose anything by him winning the general, but only a damn fool would think Kirk was one of us.
22 posted on 11/08/2010 2:12:25 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity

“Murkowski voted no last time, why would she vote yes now?”

Because she’s mean.


23 posted on 11/08/2010 2:13:00 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

On the positive side, Kirk has said no DREAM Act, no comprehensive immigration reform until the borders are secure.

Reid will be pushing this in the lame duck session, and is close to having enough votes to pass this.
Pryor is the only Dem not on board.
With Kirk seated, Reid may be stopped.
Manchin is also a wild card on this issue.


24 posted on 11/08/2010 2:15:06 PM PST by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Justaham

Rep. Kirk (my congressman) is more liberal than many Democrats. According to www.vote-smart.org, these are some of Rep. Kirk’s latest interest group ratings: Planned Parenthood, 100%; AFL-CIO, 48%: ACLU, 45%; NAACP, 44%; NEA, B; Americans for Democratic Action, 35%; Gun Owners of America, F-; ACU, 58%.; and John Birch Society, 33%. Each of these ratings is for the latest year that is available, usually 2010 or ’09. None of them is a lifetime rating.


25 posted on 11/08/2010 2:15:44 PM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

He’ll replace Burris completing the last month or so of Obama’s term, then he’ll have six years of his own.

A while back I came to the conclusion that, no matter who won this race, Illinois was going to sending another dumb-ass to Washington.


26 posted on 11/08/2010 2:16:11 PM PST by Southside_Chicago_Republican ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." --Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Murkowski voted no last time, why would she vote yes now?

Sour grapes.

27 posted on 11/08/2010 2:16:33 PM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

No, he just won; so now we have to put up with him until 2016.


28 posted on 11/08/2010 2:18:34 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; calcowgirl

As expected...Mark Kirk (DIABLO-Illinois).


29 posted on 11/08/2010 2:28:52 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner

Murkowski can’t be trusted ~ she’s clearly mentally deranged.


30 posted on 11/08/2010 2:29:34 PM PST by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
I'm glad Kirk won just to rub it in the Dems noses that they lost 0's seat

Are you kidding. The Chicago Machine orchestrated Kirk's victory.

31 posted on 11/08/2010 2:30:08 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Republic of the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Is this why I read rumors of the GOP courting Manchin?


32 posted on 11/08/2010 2:33:44 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You’d think after all the time we’ve spent educating FReepers on Kirk they’d be a little more swift than that... but then we have idiots posting DENYING the very existence of the IL Combine. Way too many fools and trolls hanging out here.


33 posted on 11/08/2010 2:34:11 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

This is designed to chill free speech. Nothing more, nothing less. We have to hold the line here and not allow a vote.


34 posted on 11/08/2010 2:35:36 PM PST by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WAW

Courting Manchin is crazy (nevermind looking at the guy he appointed to the Senate vacancy, a hard-line left-winger). He could be facing a criminal indictment in short order, and that’s all we need is to have him switch parties and then be convicted. Almost as insane as making a martyr of Kirk over not being seated, when he is a puppet of Zero’s Criminal Machine in Illinois.


35 posted on 11/08/2010 2:36:54 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Heh... an Illinois politician voting for campaign finance transparency... yeah, that’ll work...

Thanks Justaham.


36 posted on 11/08/2010 2:58:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I hope that this means that Kirk will vote for that ridiculous, unconstitutional bill next year (when it wouldn’t have a prayer of passing), not during the lame-duck session (Kirk promised that he would be a firm NO vote on anything controversial during the lame-duck session).


37 posted on 11/08/2010 3:03:55 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Hey RNC: SEE WHAT WE COULD’VE DONE WITHOUT? MAYBE YOU CLOWNS SHOULD HAVE PUT SOME MONEY BEHIND CHRISTINE AND SHARON!


38 posted on 11/08/2010 3:06:43 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
If Mark and Murky really going to do this, then Speaker Boehner should immediately convene a tribunal in the House to determine all foreign sources of Bobo's $750B that he grifted in 2008. And the Speaker should openly communicate his intent to subpoena the President.
39 posted on 11/08/2010 3:16:10 PM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

But we should have helped elect Castle to buddy up with him? LOL


40 posted on 11/08/2010 3:21:49 PM PST by Soul Seeker ( I was there when we had the numbers, but didnÂ’t have the principles.---Jim that leans conservDeMin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson